Return to Article Header
POTENTIALS
Biotoxins have the ability to kill large numbers of people in a very
short period of time. Small quantities
are sufficient to kill thousands.
Unlike biological agents, biotoxins are unable to reproduce or mutate
spontaneously so they are unlikely to turn on those employing them.
As a potential terrorist weapon biotoxins are
more than science fiction. The
distressing thing about "bioterrorism" is that it does not have to
succeed in actually harming anyone or anything in order to have an impact.
Consider, for example, the 1989 cases of the
two cyanide-laced Chilean grapes. No
one ingested cyanide and no one was harmed by the toxin.
In fact the amount found was too small to be
lethal. Yet the publicity surrounding
these two grapes caused a voluntary boycott by American consumers that resulted
in several million dollars worth of damage to Chilean agriculture, the
bankruptcy of more than a hundred growers and shippers and strained relations
between Chile and the United States.
Imagine the other sorts of damage a terrorist might do by simply
announcing that botulin or another biotoxin had been introduced into a city's
water supply.
Fortunately heating destroys most living organisms and nearly all
of their toxins, so even if these agents were used to contaminate food or
water, cooking or heating would render them
harmless. Protection against this sort of "attack" may require
little more than adequate locks on access doors and hatches, supplemented by
regular analyses.
As weapons of war biotoxins leave a great deal
to be desired. Not only are they highly unstable -- the US Army abandoned the
idea of using botulin as an aerosol when it discovered that simple sunlight
degraded it to impotency -- but extracting most of them is no simple task.
For example, one hundred pounds of shellfish
must be ground up in order to make enough saxitoxin to kill just a handful of
persons. Difficulties on this order of
magnitude make biotoxins unattractive weapons of mass destruction.
Military planners find it far easier and more efficient to rely on
something which can be mass produced, remains stable under a variety of
conditions and is easily delivered.
Biotoxins may have potential, but are not likely to replace more readily
obtainable and easier to utilize methods.
|