 The Perfect Soldier: Special Operations, Commandos, and the Future of Us Warfare by James F. Dunnigan
More Books by James Dunnigan
|
Dirty Little Secrets
The Bone Gets the Last Laugh
by James Dunnigan October 10, 2005
Discussion Board on this DLS topic
The U.S. Air Force is betting lots of money on its B-1B bomber, an aircraft
that was the victim of many cancellation attempts, and the butt of many jokes
because of that. But in the end, or at least as of today, the B-1B (nicked
named, “The Bone”) turned out to be a good investment. The B-1B carries more bombs
than any other American heavy bomber. It can also move fast (about 1,500
kilometers an hour) if it needs to, and is stealthy. The B-1B played a major
role in the 2001 campaign in Afghanistan, where eight of them dropped 40
percent of the total bomb tonnage. In Iraq in 2003, eleven B-1B's, four B-2A's
and 28 B-52H's were used. These 43 aircraft flew some 500 missions, and were
responsible for dropping a third of the bombs that hit targets during the
campaign. More importantly, these heavy bombers were able to circle up there
for hours, waiting for the ground troops to call for another smart bomb. Even
though the B-1B costs, compared to the B-52, twice as much per hour to operate,
it carries more bombs, and has a longer useful life than the B-52s (which are
twenty years older).
Most of the B-1Bs equipment is 1980s vintage. So the air force has been
investing in upgrades, upgrades that make the B-1B better at doing what it does
best. The 67 B-1Bs (on active duty) are being equipped with much improved fire
control systems. This allows them to use the latest smart bombs (like JASSM and
SDB), and makes it possible for the B-1B to use smart bombs to hit moving
targets (ships or land vehicles.) B-1Bs have gotten radar, cockpit and other
upgrades as well.
The major reason for investing money in the B-1B is because, despite all the
attention, and cash, given to the new F-22 and F-35, it’s the B-1B that will do
most of the work in any future war. Congress has been so impressed with the
B-1B that they have been pressuring the air force to activate the B-1Bs that
were deactivated. The air force doesn’t want to do this. For one thing, it
would cost over $150 million, each, to bring those aircraft back to active
service (upgraded equipment must be installed, and other components refurbished
or replaced). Moreover, as the Iraq and Afghanistan campaigns demonstrated, you
don’t need many B-1Bs to get the job done.
The air force budget is already under tremendous pressure because of the
senior leadership wanting to get the F-22 and F-35 into production, and built
in large numbers. But the generals know they would be in big trouble if another
war came along and they did not have a dozen or so B-1Bs ready to go. It’s more
likely the absence of F-22s and F-35s would not be noticed. But the B-1Bs would
definitely be missed. The air force is likely to cut purchases for the new
JSASSM cruise missile (which is having development problems), before it does
anything to the B-1B (which can carry 24 of these missiles) upgrade budget.
The JASSM is only needed if there is an opponent with a modern air defense
system to hit. At the moment, only China qualifies, and only in places. Another
bomber weapon having some problems is the SBD (the 250 pound Small Diameter
smart Bomb). The B-1B can carry over a hundred of these, which would be real
handy in a future war. The air force may sacrifice JASSM to keep the SDB alive,
and ready for use in B-1Bs. The B-1B is a lot easier to use than the B-2
(with its hard to maintain “radar absorbing” skin.) The B-1B may not have
gotten much respect over the years, but when there’s a war, it always gets the
call.
|
|