 The Perfect Soldier: Special Operations, Commandos, and the Future of Us Warfare by James F. Dunnigan
More Books by James Dunnigan
|
Dirty Little Secrets
Canada Seeks to Replace Its Fighter Pilots With Robots
by James Dunnigan October 8, 2005
Discussion Board on this DLS topic
Canada, which will have to replace its fleet of 122 American
built F-18 fighters by 2017, is seriously considering buying combat UAVs
(UCAVs). The United States already has several UCAVs in development, and so
far, the testing has gone well. Recently, one UCAV design, the X45A, even
carried out a bombing raid, after first finding the target, without any
operator intervention. The production version of this aircraft, the X45C will
be 39 feet long (with a 49 foot wingspan.) weigh 19 tons, and have a 2.2 ton
payload. The X-45C has a combat radius of 2,300 kilometers, or can go out 1,800
kilometers, hang around for two hours, and return. The X-45C can stay in the
air for about six hours on internal fuel. The X-45C will also be able to
perform in-flight refueling. Since it doesn’t carry a pilot, aerial refueling can
be done several times if there’s a need to keep the aircraft up there, and
there are no equipment problems. The 20 ton F-18 used by Canada (as the CF-18)
has less range than the X-45C, and is not as maneuverable. While there’s little
doubt that UCAVs can carry out recon and bombing missions, the big unknown is
air-to-air combat. The software guys believe this will be no problem, the pilot
community is less sure. However, tests with remotely controlled fighter
aircraft in the 1970s showed that unmanned aircraft had an edge over those with
pilots aboard (because many aircraft maneuvers are limited by the physical
limitations of the human body, not the aircraft. )
American military pilots are not looking forward to the first air-to-air combat
tests between piloted aircraft and UCAVs. At the moment, the air power generals
(nearly all of them pilots) insist that such tests won’t take place any time
soon. But if Canada expresses interest in buying the X-45C, but only if it can
handle air-to-air combat, Congress can pull rank on the air force generals, and
the Canadians will get their flying killdroids. The U.S. Air Force will get
heartburn. So if a foreign power is to adopt UCAVs, it might as be our closest
ally (although we have lost one war, and several battles, to the Canadians in
the past). The main reason the United States is spending so much money on UCAVs
is because it is obvious that someone out there will eventually have these
aircraft. If the U.S. cannot match foreign UCAVs, America will no longer rule
the skies. The UCAVs are 20-30 percent cheaper than comparable manned aircraft,
but their biggest selling point is their potential to have a significant combat
edge over manned aircraft.
|
|