Warplanes Article Index : Current 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics
Gripen NG
   Next Article → SPACE: China Rising
March 27, 2012: The Swedish Air Force wants to buy at least 60 Gripen NG (Next Generation) fighters. The NG model would be heavier (16 tons), have better electronics, a heavier payload (over four tons), and be a two seater better able to handle ground attack and electronic warfare duties. The Swedish Air Force already has 120 Gripens in service and the prospect of more defense budget cuts makes the purchase of 60 Gripen NGs (at a total cost of nearly $5 billion) difficult to carry out. But the Gripen NG would have good export prospects, and that may be the deciding factor in getting the NG going via some sales to the Swedish Air Force.

The Gripen has already undergone one major enhancement to the JAS 39C model. Improvements included inflight refueling, better electronics, and improved ground attack capability. The C model was also compliant with NATO standards for warplanes. This was necessary for export sales. There was also a two seat D model for training.

The 14 ton JAS-39C is roughly comparable to the latest versions of the F-16. The Gripen is small but can carry up to 3.6 tons of weapons. With the increasing use of smart bombs this is adequate. Often regarded as an also-ran in the current crop of "modern jet fighters", the Swedish Gripen is proving to be more competition than the major players (the F-16, F-18, F-35, Eurofighter, Rafale, MiG-29, and Su-27) expected. Put simply, Gripen does a lot of little but important things right and costs about half as much (at about $35 million each) as its major competitors. In effect, Gripen provides the ruggedness and low cost of Russian aircraft with the high quality and reliability of Western aircraft. For many nations this is an appealing combination. The Gripen is easy to use (both for pilots and ground crews) and capable of doing all jet fighter jobs (air defense, ground support, and reconnaissance) well enough.

The aircraft entered active service in 1997 and has had an uphill battle getting export sales. Sweden does not have the diplomatic clout of its major competitors, so they have to push quality and service. Swedish warplanes and products in general have an excellent reputation in both categories. Nevertheless, the Gripen is still expected to lose out on a lot of sales simply because politics took precedence over performance.

Next Article → SPACE: China Rising
  

Show Only Poster Name and Title     Newest to Oldest
trenchsol       3/27/2012 11:05:13 AM
It could help if it (Grippen) has some combat record. Libya campaign was an opportunity, Sweden could have sent a squadron to lend a hand.....
 
DG
 
 
Quote    Reply

JFKY    Really?   3/27/2012 11:34:34 AM
Could they have?  The limited number of aircraft available to the rest of the European forces suggest that NO Euro-nation could contribute a "squadron" it was hard enough to maintain the limited number of A/c contributed, due to maintenance and spares problems.  No knock on NATO-much, but the campaign stretched the Ad'A and the RAF and most of the other contributors.
 
I had to laugh about the article concerning what America "lost" over Libya...be nice if the Europeans bought a few of those vaunted PGM's and a few more spares.....
 
Quote    Reply

Phaid       3/28/2012 1:10:10 AM
Um... they did....  Not a whole squadron of course, but Swedish Gripens did participate.
 
Quote    Reply

trenchsol       3/28/2012 9:32:33 AM

Um... they did.......  Not a whole squadron of course, but Swedish Gripens did participate.

Interesting.... So how did Grippen perform ?
 
DG
 
 
Quote    Reply

trenchsol       3/28/2012 9:40:46 AM

Um... they did.......  Not a whole squadron of course, but Swedish Gripens did participate.
I found this:
 
The mandate from the Swedish Parliament for this mission does not include air-to-ground operations, so the Swedish AF Gripen will operate in the air defence and reconnaissance roles over Libya, enforcing the No-Fly Zone.
 
Well, there wasn't any air-to-air, as far as I know. Not much to boost sales....  They also had fuel problem, I've heard. Proven combat record means very much. It means no significant hidden design or construction problems which might prevent aircraft from fulfilling the mission.
 
DG
 
 
Quote    Reply

C3I2       4/1/2012 3:20:20 PM
NG would be a one seater, with some models made as two seaters, more or less depending on customer demand. The current demo version is a two seater however.
 
Quote    Reply

Lars       4/3/2012 4:13:01 PM
The fuel problem was simply the fact that the base in Sicily, as a naval base, only had the special JP-5 type fuel used by carrier planes (JP-5 has a higher flammability point for added protection against fire on-board a carrier). Gripen uses standard JA-1 fuel. They got it from off the base.
 
Quote    Reply