Armor Article Index : Current 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics
Untested New MRAPs
   Next Article → SURFACE FORCES : Training in the Royal Navy

November 8, 2007: The U.S. decision to rapidly increase the number of MRAPs (Mine Resistant Ambush Protected) [PHOTO] vehicles from 2,000 to 17,000, resulted in several new and untried (in combat) designs suddenly showing up. That's because existing manufacturers of MRAP vehicles did not have the capacity to build a lot more, as quickly as the Department of Defense wanted them. Other manufacturers did not believe it efficient to build existing MRAP designs under license. The Department of Defense went along with that.

 

This was because MRAPs are basically armored, and heavily modified trucks. These bomb resistant vehicles cost about five times more than armored hummers or trucks. This is justified by the fact that MRAPs are safer, and these vehicles would prevent up to a hundred troops a month from getting killed or wounded.

 

Currently, the most common MRAP is the Cougar [PHOTO], followed by the larger Buffalo [PHOTO]. MRAPs like these are built using the same construction techniques pioneered by South African firms that have, over the years, delivered thousands of landmine resistant vehicles to the South African armed forces. These were a great success. The South African technology was imported into the U.S. in 1998, and has already been used in the design of vehicles used by peacekeepers in the Balkans.

 

The 7-12 ton Cougar comes in two basic versions. The four wheel one can carry ten passengers, the six wheel one can carry 16. The trucks cost about $730,000 each, fully equipped. The Buffalos are 23 ton, heavily modified, Peterbuilt Mac-10 trucks. Costing $740,000 each, they have added armor protection to keep out machine-gun bullets.

 

The most common new MRAPs include the MaxxPro, a 16 ton vehicle that can carry six troops and costs $548,000. Another new one is the Caiman,   a 14 ton vehicle carrying six troops and costing $443,000. These two models account for about half the 7,000 new MRAPs on order. The rest come from existing suppliers, and several other new MRAP manufacturers. All these vehicles share common design features, and that fact that they are just more massive. This protects the crew, which is mainly what an MRAP exists to do.

 

Next Article → SURFACE FORCES : Training in the Royal Navy
  

Show Only Poster Name and Title     Newest to Oldest
sjdoc    With multiple vehicles in inventory...   11/8/2007 10:40:26 AM
--
...doesn't the DoD anticipate some problems (including costs) associated with maintenance and repairs?
 
How are they coping?
 
 
-- 
 
Quote    Reply

DarthAmerica       11/8/2007 10:51:40 AM

--

...doesn't the DoD anticipate some problems (including costs) associated with maintenance and repairs?

How are they coping?

-- 

Things are actually pretty smooth to include training the crews. $$$Contractors$$$ come out and teach the maintenance personnel and even assist in maintaining the vehicles. The most common bottleneck is parts but it's more of an annoyance rather than show stopper. People would be really impressed if they understood the DoD ability to wage and sustain war even with all the inefficiencies.

-DA

 
Quote    Reply

dba       11/8/2007 12:49:38 PM
"Other manufacturers did not believe it efficient to build existing MRAP designs under license. The Department of Defense went along with that."

Sounds like a very poor decision to me.  Who's going to pay for all the different spare parts etc, not just now but in the future?  Why can't DoD force other manufacturers to make same model under license?  It worked during WW2 fine.  Nice work by sales folks from all the MRAP manufacturers.
 
Quote    Reply

Herald1234    Panic buy logistics incurred by luddite politicians.   11/8/2007 3:50:00 PM
DEAL.
 
Herald
 
Quote    Reply

Vega       11/8/2007 6:37:01 PM
Untested in Iraq, maybe, but they did pass Aberdeen IED tests, and thus the DoD purchased a few thousand.
 
There is no perfect MRAP vehicle design out there, so like anything, one makes trade offs; armor, mobility, weight, fuel economy, survivability, training, maintenance, design life, upgradeablility, short and long term costs, supply chains, production quotas, and on and on and on. NOT AN EASY DESCISION!
 
It would be nice if we could decide on one basic MRAP model, so economies of scale could apply, but poor post cold war planning, did not foresee a need for a new heavy armored truck, and we are now are stuck with this cumbersome and expensive process.
 
We must do whatever it takes to save US lives on the battlefield, and maybe neutralize our enemies favorite tactic.
 
Quote    Reply