Armor Article Index : Current 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics
TUSK Shields The Loader
   Next Article → SPACE: Russia Invades Brazil
April 20, 2008: The U.S. Army is buying 2,832 "loaders' armor gun shields," to provide protection around the loaders hatch on the top of the M-1 Abrams turret. The loader (who normally loads the 120mm gun), also has his own hatch, and a 7.62mm machine-gun on top of the turret. The other machine-gun, next to the commanders hatch, is 12.7mm (.50 caliber) and already has a gun shield. The loaders gun shield kits cost about $16,000 each.

 

The loaders gun shield is part of the TUSK (Tank Urban Survival Kit) [PHOTO]. The kit is a collection of additional features for M1 tanks, which make them more effective when fighting in urban areas. Many of the items in TUSK have been added to tanks over the last three years, as they became available.

 

The upgrades include the "loaders' armor gun shields," which is transparent ballistic glass, so the loader doesn't have his vision blocked. This is important for street fighting.  The loaders machine-gun is also equipped with a thermal sight, making it more deadly at night. There is also a .50 caliber machine-gun being mounted on the main gun, so the 120mm fire control system can be used to fire the machine-gun, instead of 120mm shells.

 

Other components of TUSK are reactive armor panels for the side and rear of the tank, to provide added protection from RPGs. A slat armor panel protects the engine exhaust outlet of the tank from RPGs. A 1.5 ton belly armor kit, which can be installed in two hours, provides additional protection from mines and large bombs. Enhancements also include  night vision for all  crew members. There is also a telephone added to the side of the tank, so that infantry can more easily communicate with the crew when the tank is "buttoned up" (all hatches closed). The complete TUSK kit costs about $500,000 each and takes about twelve hours to install all the components.

 

Additional TUSK items are in the works, like a rear-view camera for the driver and CROWS, a system that allows the commanders .50 caliber machine-un to be operated remotely, while the tank commander is inside the turret. This is particularly useful if the tank is taking a lot of small arms fire.

 

TUSK was first proposed three years ago, and kits began arriving in Iraq a year ago.

 

Next Article → SPACE: Russia Invades Brazil
  

Show Only Poster Name and Title     Newest to Oldest
kensohaski       4/20/2008 10:33:03 AM
Does this limit the mobility at all?
 
Quote    Reply

Dave_in_Pa       4/20/2008 12:11:18 PM
Side and rear reactive armor panels, engine exhaust armor, additional belly armor, machine gunner's gunshield, plus various other doodads...Sounds like a good five tons added, taking the M1 from 68 to 73+tons.
 
Since the M1s are being used in urban combat now, I'd guess this added weight isn't a major factor to performance. That relatively slight performance cost would seem to be more than offset by the significant tactical and safety value of these add-ons.
 
Quote    Reply

Something Meatier       4/21/2008 11:07:44 PM
Does someone have a picture of the .50 cal mounted on the main gun?
 
Quote    Reply

ArtyEngineer    Picture (Hopefully)   4/23/2008 12:34:06 AM

Does someone have a picture of the .50 cal mounted on the main gun?



http://www.gunmasters.com/100_1903.JPG">http://www.gunmasters.com/100_1903.JPG" width=600 border=0>
 
Quote    Reply

k3n-54n       4/28/2008 2:19:54 PM
I have hear so many times that reactive armor is not preferred because it is a serious danger to nearby infantry.  Is this less true in an urban environment?  Why not add slat armor instead?
 
Quote    Reply

Yimmy       4/28/2008 2:27:23 PM
I don't know how well slat armour would protect against the momentum of a 125mm HEAT projectile fired from a tank gun.

Better to have a working tank supporting the infantry.


 
Quote    Reply

flamingknives       4/28/2008 3:50:19 PM
Modern ERA isn't as offensive, AIUI.
 
Quote    Reply