Armor Article Index : Current 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics
Poland Equips The Malaysian Tank Regiment
   Next Article → THAILAND: Bout Bounced While The South Sizzles
September 9, 2010: Malaysia has completed staffing, equipping and training its first tank regiment. The unit is equipped with 48 Polish PT-91 tanks. This is an upgraded version of the Russian designed (but manufactured in Poland) T-72M1. The 46 ton PT-91 uses the original 125mm gun, a 12.7mm machine gun, and a coaxial 7.62mm machine gun. But it has new electronics, upgrades to the engine and ERA (Explosive Reactive Armor). It also costs less than half what a similar Western tank would go for. While not as effective as an M-1 or Leopard, the PT-91 is adequate for whatever neighbors might have.

The PT-91 is one of many upgraded or evolved T-72s. The T-72 tank is the most widely used tank since World War II. Over 50,000 have been built (compared to 84,000 World War II T-34s). Ironically, the T-72 was a stopgap design, intended to provide a replacement for the more advanced T-64, which was not successful.

Production began in 1972, and the T-72 entered service in 1976. Compared to the earlier T-62 and T-64, the T-72 was successful. It was reliable and combat ready, or so it was thought. But in 1982, Syrian T-72s went up against Israeli Merkavas. The Syrians lost badly. In 1991, Iraqi T-72s were helpless against American M-1 tanks, and M-2 Infantry Fighting Vehicles. But the T-72 remained popular. Partly because it was so cheap. Cold War surplus vehicles, in good shape, could be had for as little as $100,000. The vehicle was still popular because of its reliability. Most nations never expected to use their T-72s in combat, but it was more useful for them to be in running condition in peacetime, when they could control unruly civilians, or at least look good in parades.

Another reason for the popularity of the T-72 is the large number of upgrades available, the PT-91 being but one of many examples. While the basic T-72 was pretty unimpressive, a few upgrades can turn it into a much more formidable (and expensive) tank. For example, modern, computerized, fire control systems, with laser range finders and night-vision sights, and quality ammunition, transforms a T-72 into a very lethal system. While such a tank would still get blasted by an M-1, if the T-72 spotted the M-1 first, and got a flank shot, it could win. The T-72 is also a very mobile vehicle, about on a par with the famously nimble M-1. But protection is always going to be a problem. The stock T-72 is a 41 ton vehicle that is 7.4 meters/23 feet long, 3.6 meters/11 feet wide and 2.45 meters/7.5 feet high. An M-1 is 62 tons, 10 meters/32 feet long, 3.7 meters/12 feet wide and 2.6 meters/eight feet high. The extra weight is mostly armor, and from the front, the M-1 is still very difficult to kill. To survive, a T-72 not only needs to accessorize, but requires a well trained crew. Most nations using T-72s, don't like to invest in crew training. But that's what makes the most difference in combat.

The T-72 is surviving into the 21st century because Russia's new T-90 was, again, a fall-back design. The T-80 was supposed to be the successor to the T-72. But like the T-62 and T-64 before it, the T-80 didn't quite work out as planned. So the T-72, with a much improved turret and all manner of gadgets, was trotted out as the T-90. Weighing 47 tons, the T-90 is still the same dimensions as the T-72. Same package, better contents. And with well trained crews, it could be deadly.

Next Article → THAILAND: Bout Bounced While The South Sizzles
  

Show Only Poster Name and Title     Newest to Oldest
Shawnc    ORLY?   9/9/2010 10:14:50 AM
Malaysia has completed staffing, equipping and training its first tank regiment. The unit is equipped with 48 Polish PT-91 tanks. This is an upgraded version of the Russian designed (but manufactured in Polandhttp://images.intellitxt.com/ast/adTypes/mag-glass_10x10.gif" alt="" />) T-72M1. The 46 ton PT-91 uses the original 125mm gun, a 12.7mm machine gun, and a coaxial 7.62mm machine gun. But it has new electronics, upgrades to the engine and ERA (Explosive Reactive Armor). It also costs less than half what a similar Western tank would go for. While not as effective as an M-1 or Leopard, the PT-91 is adequate for whatever neighbors might have.
 
Well, apart from the fact that they ordered the tanks in 2003 and took first delivery in 2007, it's a bit long just to train up one regiment of tanks, don't you think?
 
In the meantime, one of their Longbow Apache equipped neighbours bought around 96 ex-Bundeswehr Leopard 2A4s at a bargain in 2006, had them delivered and commissioned by 2008 and recently upgraded them to THIS:
 http://www.worldaffairsboard.com/attachments/land-forces/21914d1281229491-singapore-army-26_105638_8cba1927f443752-1-.jpg" />
 
Quote    Reply

davidhughes       9/9/2010 5:52:44 PM
In many ways Malaysia competes with India for the incompetance and endless delays of its procurement system. I suspect that is the reason for the delay. The only reason I can think of why a T-72 mod would be preferable to the Leopard (widely considered to be the best MBT ever built) is that both weight and width are factors. Unlike the urban landscape of Singapore, Malaysia has marginal infrastructure away from its cities. By some accounts the government is concerned over breakaway elements in some of the provinces - the PT-91 would be a good choice for handling those.
 
Quote    Reply

Shawnc       9/10/2010 3:04:40 AM
>In many ways Malaysia competes with India for the incompetance and endless delays of its procurement system. I suspect that is the reason for the delay.
 
Pretty much for similar reasons. The RMAF actually 'lost' an F-5E engine.. after speculation that it was stolen and sold to Iran or Chile, they finally discovered it was broken down into spare parts which were resold back to the RMAF!
 
They bought 260 Adnan AFVs from Turkey but forgot to order spares..
 
Oh, read this article.
 
That works out to about USD$9.9 million per vehicle! One of their rationals is that they need to develop a product to export... so they're going to enter a market sector already saturated with 8x8 AFVs...
 
>The only reason I can think of why a T-72 mod would be preferable to the Leopard (widely considered to be the best MBT ever built) is that both weight and width are factors. Unlike the urban landscape of Singapore
 
Lets just say that for many reasons, Singapore and Malaysia are typical neighbours who occasionally have disputes, and that Singapore has a forward defense strategy. One reason why Singapore maintained a fleet of over 300 aging AMX-13 tanks for decades was that they were light enough to travese over low tonnage bridges in their 'intended' terrain, and narrow enough to fit the intended terrain.
 
The acquisition of the Leo 2s, as well as the acquisition of other assets, is part of an evolution in Singapore's defense policy towards an integrated, networked force structure. The exact upgrade to those Leos are unknown, the Singapore Army states that they are equivlent to the Leo 2A6 standard (apart from retaining the A4's gun caliber)
 
Quote    Reply