Electronic Weapons Article Index : Current 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics
Blinded By The Laser Light
   Next Article → CHAD: A Pit Of Pure Evil
January 14, 2009: The U.S. Marine Corps has decided to equip its CH-53D and CH-46E helicopters with DIRCM (Directional Infrared Countermeasures.) Equipping helicopters with defenses against shoulder fired surface-to-air missiles (like the SAM-7 or Stinger) is shifting from systems that use flares, to those that use laser beams.

A typical system has two components. First, there are four ultraviolet detection sensors (weighing about four pounds each) mounted on different parts of the helicopter to detect an approaching missile. These sensor are linked to an 6-12 pound computer that contains software for determining that the object is indeed a missile and where it is headed. The detection computer is hooked to a countermeasures system using either flares and chaff (strips of metal foil), or a laser, to confuse the missiles guidance system (that is homing in the heat of the helicopters engines.) The countermeasures component weighs 30-50 pounds, depending on type or model. 

For over a decade there was is a debate going on in the military over whether to equip helicopters with the army developed ATIRCM/CMWS (Advanced Threat Infrared Countermeasures/Common Missile Warning System), that uses flares and chaff, or a system (DIRCM), that uses a laser to confuse the missiles guidance system. The DIRCM originally cost about 40 percent more than the ATIRCM/CMWS (which costs two million dollars per aircraft). But the cost difference has been shrinking. The ATIRCM/CMWS uses a proven technology, while the DIRCM's laser has slowly been gaining experience under combat conditions. The army initially equipped some of its Special Forces helicopters with DIRCM, and now there's a lot of momentum behind only using DIRCM in the future. So far, fewer than twenty American helicopters have been hit by missiles in Iraq and Afghanistan, and many more attempts have been foiled by missile countermeasures.

Next Article → CHAD: A Pit Of Pure Evil
  

Show Only Poster Name and Title     Newest to Oldest
mabie       9/26/2009 9:16:13 AM
Just a question about jamming IR missile seekers. Aside from flares and lasers, could a powerful focused EM beam from an AESA radar "burn"  out the electronics in the IR seeker or related missile circuitry?
 
Quote    Reply

WarNerd       9/27/2009 1:59:10 AM

Just a question about jamming IR missile seekers. Aside from flares and lasers, could a powerful focused EM beam from an AESA radar "burn"  out the electronics in the IR seeker or related missile circuitry?

If the missile has some form of EMP hardening, not likely.  And even if the missile is not EMP hardened, the answer is still probably not.  Remember, these missiles are designed to home in on targets that may have active jammers radiating, so they probably test for susceptibility to RFI.
 
Quote    Reply

mabie       9/27/2009 2:32:26 AM

OK reasonable answer.. we'll only know for sure when actual missiles are fired in anger.. I think any test results for this sort of thing are going to be kept confidential.

Much has been said about the electronic attack capabilities of AESA radars specifically against aircraft, cruise missiles, radar-guided missiles, etc. I wonder if many air forces are confident  of their ability to cope with the threat or if many have plans to upgrade their systems. Again, not something you commonly read about.

 
Quote    Reply