Logistics Article Index : Current 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics
The Military Battles The Rising Price Of Oil
   Next Article → AIR WEAPONS: JASSM Lurches Forward

July 3, 2008: The U.S. Department of Defense consumes about 110 million barrels of oil a year (about two percent of all U.S. oil use). At current prices, that's over $15 billion a year just for fuel. About 8 percent of that goes for ships, giving the U.S. Navy a big incentive to find ways to move the ships using less fuel. Lots of ideas for that have been developed over the years, but there was little financial, or command, incentive to implement. Now there is, and the navy has managed to come up with ways to save about 12 percent on their fuel bills.

Two measures accounted for most of the savings. First, there was a program to simply tweak ship power systems to reduce fuel use, without getting in the way of running the ship. This has been a pet peeve of many sailors, and navy critics, for a long time. That's because it was noticed how the navy was falling behind commercial shipbuilding in areas like automation and more efficient operation in general. Navy crews were seen as too large, and not always making the most efficient use of their time. As is often the case, a serious shortage (of money to pay for fuel) has changed attitudes. Five years ago, oil cost under $30 a barrel. A year ago, it was under $70 a barrel. Now it's $140 a barrel. New ideas are suddenly welcome, 

The second initiative is to make the ships more hydrodynamic (moving through the water more easily.) This includes anti-fouling coating for the hull, stern flaps, and other tweaks.  Future initiatives involve low-power light fixtures, and lower power equipment in general, as well as sensors to shut off equipment when not needed. Plus anything else smart sailors can come up with.

A more long distance solution is to equip more ships with nuclear power. With oil headed to $200 a barrel, and over half a century of experience with this technology (and an exemplary safety record), this is one way to cut a lot of fuel cost. That won't help the fuel costs for aircraft (73 percent of all military oil consumption), or ground vehicles (15 percent), but every little bit helps.

Next Article → AIR WEAPONS: JASSM Lurches Forward
  

Show Only Poster Name and Title     Newest to Oldest
SOP919F3       7/3/2008 7:11:41 PM

Fischer-Tropsch Fuel Blend

C-17 flies cross country on synthetic fuel

By Patrick Winn - Staff writer
Posted : Thursday Dec 20, 2007 11:34:51 EST
. To view the contents go to:" type="hidden" /> http://www.airforcetimes.com/news/2007/12/airforce_synthetic_fuel_1217/" type="hidden" />

Today was the day the first C-17 Globemaster flew across the country powered by synthetic fuel.

A Globemaster — its tanks half-filled with standard jet fuel and half with a synthetic, coal-derived fuel — flew Dec. 17 from Washington?s McChord Air Force Base to New Jersey?s McGuire Air Force Base. The B-52 bomber is already certified to use this fuel mix and full certification is expected for the C-17 in coming months.

It?s the latest milestone in an effort to prove all of the Air Force?s fleet can use this domestically produced synthetic fuel by 2011. By 2016, the Air Force wants all of its flights in the continental U.S. powered by the mix, touted as cleaner and less reliant on petroleum piped from foreign soil.
>>
 
 Side note: JP8 will run Diesel engines with injector timing modifications (for efficiency), the only issue may be lubricity.
h**p://journals.pepublishing.com/content/b523k58701231886/fulltext.pdf

Of course if you want to be "greener" throw the oars back in the water like the Vikings used to.
 
Quote    Reply