Morale Article Index : Current 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics
The Bennies
   Next Article → MORALE: USAF Cuts The Crap
July 6, 2007: As it does periodically, the U.S. government did a study comparing military pay with what civilians of the same age and education make. For example, the average 20 year old E-3 (someone in about two years, and not having any trouble with military life) is earning $32,900 in cash and $27,600 in benefits (health care, housing and food, veterans benefits, and so on). If married, pay and benefits go up about 20 percent (to, in this case, to about $76,000, which is why so many junior troops are married). For those who are making a career of it, pay and benefits ranges from $100,900 for a 25 year old E-5 with six hears service, to $170,700 for a 44 year old E-9 with 25 years of service.

 

These are averages. Troops serving in combat zones, or with critical skills, make more. But even a new, unmarried, recruit, still in training, makes $54,900 (46 percent of it in benefits). The military only takes people who would also be attractive to civilian employers, and over 80 percent of them will be doing what are essentially civilian jobs. These combat support troops, when serving in places like Iraq or Afghanistan, rarely leave their well guarded bases. The dangerous jobs are in the combat units, and, oddly enough, there is no shortage of volunteers for those positions.

 

The big thing that attracts most recruits is the benefits, or "bennies." The money for post-service tuition (you can attend college classes tuition free while in the military), and a wide array of other veterans benefits, is a big draw. It's mostly word-of-mouth, with potential recruits having bumped into a young veteran, and noted that he, or she, was debt free and flush, at least compared to most others their age.

Next Article → MORALE: USAF Cuts The Crap
  

Show Only Poster Name and Title     Newest to Oldest
sclayton    Can you Quantify theBenefits?   7/6/2007 9:11:18 AM
The benefits side 46% of compensationis extraordinarily  high compared to civilian companies.  I have seen benefits breakdowns at several very large US multinationals and it is around 24 to 26% (medical insurance, dental insurance, eyecare, 401K, life insurance, diasability insurance,  social security, vacation, etc.) and smaller US companies are substantially lower.  I assume a large part of the "military difference" is housing, food, education and retirement  related, since almost no civilian employers have housing, food,  post-service tuition or 'traditional" pension  benefits.

What is the breakdown into individual catagories of benefits for the 3  examples you have cited?

1. 20 year old E-3  is earning $32,900 in cash and $27,600 in benefits

Healthcare =
housing =
life insurance =
food =
in-service tuition =
post-service tuition =
retirement =
vacation =
sick days =

total  =                     46%

2.  $100,900 for a 25 year old E-5 with six years service,  (presumably $54,500 cash, $46,400 benefits)

3.  $170,700 for a 44 year old E-9 with 25 years of service.

You prefaced the last 2 with "
For those who are making a career of it,"  -  What was that meant to include?  - a larger # for "retirement?"

This article has interesting information and will be more interesting to more people if you can provide
these additional facts.



 
Quote    Reply

Jeff_F_F       7/6/2007 5:11:07 PM
The biggest difference is probably housing, since typical companies don't pay for that. From what I understand, the quality of health care is typically on par with private HMO systems. For the Navy and Air Force it is a pretty good HMO, for the Army a not so good one. Though that may be changing with the need to attract and keep personnel. I had a friend that recently went through pregnancy as a Navy fiance and I was pretty impressed by the level of service she recieved, up to and including one session a week with a personal fitness trainer specializing in exercise during pregnancy.
 
Quote    Reply

macawman       7/7/2007 5:46:48 AM
This line of thought seems to miss the point that serving overseas in third world states means that the service personnel will actually need those medical bennies often.  Blowing sand mixed with dung and temperatures approaching 120 degrees F are not conducive to maintaining good health. 
 
Quote    Reply