Morale Article Index : Current 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics
A Russian Scary Tale
   Next Article → NAVAL AIR: Where There Were None, Now There Is One

August 20, 2009: Russia fighter pilot Igor Tkachenko predicted his own death in the air four years ago. Sort of. Back in 2005, Tkachenko complained that the Su-27s given to the acrobatics team he leads were unfit for regular fighter squadrons, and required considerable refurbishment and maintenance before his pilots could safely use them. But the Russian Air Force has long had problems maintaining its high performance aircraft. A shortage of qualified and experienced maintainers, plus parts and equipment shortages, as well as defective parts, created a perpetual headache for squadron maintenance officers. The usual result was fewer aircraft fit to fly, and this limited the training pilots got.

Earlier this month, Tkachenko died when his Su-27 collided with another Su-27 while practicing for an acrobatic air show. Tkachenko is the leader of the Russian Knights aircraft demonstration team, that performs at air shows and other events. Most large air forces have such teams, and they usually get priority in terms of aircraft and maintainers. But even with that, Tkachenko was unable to keep his units aircraft up to the required standards.

While Russia was able to design and build Western quality fighters (the MiG-29 and Su-27/30) by the end of the Cold War, they pushed their technology, and manufacturing capabilities to the limit. While the Russians were able to keep their maintenance and reliability problems out of the news, foreign intelligence agencies knew. So did nations that bought these high performance jets, but they got great bargains, and assurances from the Russians that proper spare parts would be provided, and the users could train and retain capable maintainers (or, in some cases, hire foreign technicians to do it right.) Many of the less developed nations that bought these high end fighters, saw them waste away from lack of effective maintenance. Since this also happened if they bought Western fighters, they kept quiet and were content for all the money they saved buying the cheaper Russian stuff. Enough of these spiffy looking fighters could be out into the air to dazzle the locals, and potentially troublesome neighbors.

Meanwhile, Russia continues scrambling to remain competitive in the jet fighter market. With F-22 production being shut down, with fewer than 200 built, Russia has a shot of at least producing fighters equal (at least on paper and in demonstrations) to Western aircraft. But the more hidden problems of parts quality and aircraft reliability remain, waiting for a fix, or a wartime embarrassment that could run Russia out of the jet fighter business.

Next Article → NAVAL AIR: Where There Were None, Now There Is One
  

Show Only Poster Name and Title     Newest to Oldest
Babeouf    A Russian scary tale   8/20/2009 7:02:46 AM
All your tales about Russia are scary. Still the main problem that Sukhoi has with its fighters seems to be
producing enough to meet demands.
 
Quote    Reply

enomosiki       8/20/2009 2:32:26 PM

Still the main problem that Sukhoi has with its fighters seems to be producing enough to meet demands.



Not when their own government actually had to bail the company out.
 
Quote    Reply

Babeouf    Ignorance is bliss   8/21/2009 5:04:40 AM
As recently demonstrated by the collapse of various branches of the Capitalist economy there is a difference between productive capacity and profitability. Sukhoi has a demand for its military planes that outstrips supply. The prices at which this occurs mean that production is not profitable. It will have to increase its capacity to enjoy greater economies of scale , reducing unit cost. That is what it will do on the back of large government orders. Still I'm sure Fox News will prefer your comment.
 
Quote    Reply

FreeW       8/21/2009 1:54:28 PM
Great article. All very true.
 
Quote    Reply

Toosh       8/22/2009 6:22:27 PM

As recently demonstrated by the collapse of various branches of the Capitalist economy there is a difference between productive capacity and profitability.
The problems in the auto industry were brought on by the sky rocketing cost of oil and hence the cost of gasoline. Sales of cars plummeted because of that. It has nothing to do with capacity or a lack of profitability. No doubt you've been eating double helpings of gruel back in the gulag.
 
Quote    Reply

razputin       8/23/2009 1:06:24 AM



As recently demonstrated by the collapse of various branches of the Capitalist economy there is a difference between productive capacity and profitability.


The problems in the auto industry were brought on by the sky rocketing cost of oil and hence the cost of gasoline. Sales of cars plummeted because of that. It has nothing to do with capacity or a lack of profitability. No doubt you've been eating double helpings of gruel back in the gulag.

The problem with US auto industry is that it was being complacent about customer demands and putting all its eggs into huge trucks basket while Japanese competitors did evertyhing possible to improve its design and production and were first to market with energy efficient automobiles forcing US car makers to play catch up)) Four out of five top selling vehicles in the US are made by foreigners. GM is forced to sell the Opel to a company serving as a front to Kremlin interests with Germans serving as a middleman.
The gulag gruel nowadays comes in different flavors with colorful wrapping and is made in China btw)))
 
Quote    Reply

razputin       8/23/2009 1:22:46 AM



As recently demonstrated by the collapse of various branches of the Capitalist economy there is a difference between productive capacity and profitability.


The problems in the auto industry were brought on by the sky rocketing cost of oil and hence the cost of gasoline. Sales of cars plummeted because of that. It has nothing to do with capacity or a lack of profitability. No doubt you've been eating double helpings of gruel back in the gulag.

The problem with US auto industry is that it was being complacent about customer demands and putting all its eggs into huge trucks basket while Japanese competitors did evertyhing possible to improve its design and production and were first to market with energy efficient automobiles forcing US car makers to play catch up)) Four out of five top selling vehicles in the US are made by foreigners. GM is forced to sell the Opel to a company serving as a front to Kremlin interests with Germans serving as a middleman.
The gulag gruel nowadays comes in different flavors with colorful wrapping and is made in China btw)))
 
Quote    Reply

cwDeici       8/23/2009 8:48:27 AM



As recently demonstrated by the collapse of various branches of the Capitalist economy there is a difference between productive capacity and profitability.


The problems in the auto industry were brought on by the sky rocketing cost of oil and hence the cost of gasoline. Sales of cars plummeted because of that. It has nothing to do with capacity or a lack of profitability. No doubt you've been eating double helpings of gruel back in the gulag.

The collapse of the auto industries is because of American attempts at union socialism.
 
Quote    Reply

cwDeici       8/23/2009 8:52:19 AM
Secondly is bad market choices and gasolin prices thirdly, as mentioned.
 
Quote    Reply

cwDeici       8/23/2009 8:53:18 AM
Welfare for union members is good, but if it's taken too far it becomes a form of beurocratic socialism backed up by the goodwill of a capitalist mixed-market democracy.
 
Quote    Reply