Morale Article Index : Current 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics
Killing JFK All Over Again
   Next Article → WINNING: Busting Balls In Baluchistan
November 29, 2009: The U.S. Navy recently retired its last non-nuclear aircraft carrier, the USS John F. Kennedy. The navy is now offering the ship to any government or non-profit organization that wants to maintain it as a museum ship. Entering service in 1968, the Kennedy is 321 meters (1052 feet) long and displaces 82,000 tons. It would be the largest museum ship ever. The ship is currently docked in Philadelphia, and there is much enthusiasm in Boston for taking the carrier, named after a native son, and establishing a museum ship. The big problem, for whoever takes the ship, is money. Lots of money. Hundreds of millions to outfit the ship as a museum and maintain it.

The navy has long been willing to donate old ships to groups that were willing to maintain the retired vessels as museum ships. But the navy attaches some very expensive strings. That is, the navy expects the ship to be kept in decent shape. This is a problem with many old metal ships, as they rust. And eventually they rust so much that the hull is breached, and ultimately will collapse.

For example, one museum ship, the World War II era, Essex class carrier USS Intrepid, in New York City, recently returned to its display berth after a two year refurbishment, costing $120 million. The entire hull was examined, in dry dock, for decay, and over a hundred square meters of hull had to be replaced. A sister ship of the Intrepid, the Yorktown, requires a similar refurbishment. Since 1975, the Yorktown has been on display in Charleston, South Carolina, with several other museum ships. The Yorktown, which entered service four months before the Intrepid, needs the same kind of work. The navy is insisting on it, with the alternatives being sending the ship to the breakers (to be broken up for scrap) or a lawsuit. The naval museum in South Carolina is in a bad situation, as $120 million is hard to find, even when the economy (and wealthy donors) are doing well. The big donors are much harder to find these days.

But even sending the ship to the scrap yard is not a viable alternative. For a long time, unneeded ships were "sent to the breakers" (a shipyard that broke the ship up for scrap and reusable parts). However, this is now considered environmentally harmful if done the old fashioned way (as it is still done in countries like India), and too expensive if it is done in an environmentally (and politically) acceptable way. In other words, it could cost more scrap the Yorktown than to repair her.

So what's to be done? A popular option these days is to use old ships for target practice. For example, of 31 recently decommissioned Spruance class destroyers, 22 were used for target practice. Some old warships are sunk closer to the shore, to provide reefs for fish and scuba divers. Running a SINKEX (sinking exercise) on the Kennedy would be a valuable undertaking, as it would enable the navy to test some theories on how vulnerable, or invulnerable, modern carriers are.

But the situation with the Yorktown is not lost to potential recipients of the Kennedy. The Yorktown may yet go to the breakers, scuba divers or friendly fire. But unless the money can be found, the Yorktown will go down, as will the Kennedy.

 

Next Article → WINNING: Busting Balls In Baluchistan
  

Show Only Poster Name and Title     Newest to Oldest
stoker       11/29/2009 5:49:04 PM
You would think India would jump at the chance to buy an actual 'real' carrier, than continue on with the very expensive 'white elephant' they will someday, maybe, get from Russia.
 
All India needs to do is to refuse to pay Russia any more money and cancel the deal for the Gorshkov.
 
India would have the ability to re furbish the JFK back up to fully operational status and also would have enough sailors to man her.
 
India could then cancel the Mig 29 waste of money and opt for the far better SF18/E/F.
 
Quote    Reply

greyghost       11/30/2009 6:58:48 AM
 That would be a good idea for India. Will most likely never happen ,corruption rules.
 
Quote    Reply

ndonovan       11/30/2009 3:32:57 PM
$100M seems like a lot of money for a glorified paint job.  The ship does not have to be seaworthy.  I assume the Navy turns the ship over in good condition and to prevent rust a museum would just have to keep the ship painted.  Couldn't they even use volunteers for some of this?  What am I missing?  Under the waterline would be an issue, but I assume there is material that can be applied below water.
 
Quote    Reply

cwDeici       12/1/2009 1:12:56 PM

You would think India would jump at the chance to buy an actual 'real' carrier, than continue on with the very expensive 'white elephant' they will someday, maybe, get from Russia.

 

All India needs to do is to refuse to pay Russia any more money and cancel the deal for the Gorshkov.

 

India would have the ability to re furbish the JFK back up to fully operational status and also would have enough sailors to man her.

 

India could then cancel the Mig 29 waste of money and opt for the far better SF18/E/F.


India prizes the unique global position of stupidity, which necessarily includes deferring to US goods no more than once in a while regardless of the quality differential.
Oh sorry, I meant 'the unique global position of non-alignment'.
 
My China knows to buy from the cheap and steal from the best (and the cheap, just to cover our bases).
 
Quote    Reply

cwDeici       12/1/2009 1:16:41 PM
Plus, the military budget is rather small and only recently accelerated. The Americans would charge more than the Russians in the short run unless the Indians warm up to them. In the long run maintainance would cost the Indians too, but that would be what they need to pay for a learning experience in running a modern navy rather than running a modern bargain bussiness.
 
Quote    Reply

DaemonAngel       12/1/2009 5:08:48 PM
Nothing larger than a Cruiser can be sold to a foreign buyer, so India is out of luck in any case.
 
Quote    Reply