Submarines Article Index : Current 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics
Drug Sub War Intensifies
   Next Article → ATTRITION: Judge Grounds Dodgy Bombers

January 10, 2008: The Colombian Navy took down yet another cocaine carrying submarine, off the Pacific coast. This is the second one in a month. Like the last one, this sub appeared to be carrying several tons of cocaine, but the crew scuttled the craft before the navy could capture it. The water was too deep, where the craft went down, to recover it. The crew of the submersible was captured, and found to have traces of cocaine on their clothing. The Colombian navy has captured or destroyed (usually with the crew sinking the sub to avoid the government capturing its precious cargo, and any incriminating documents on board) 18 such craft in the last three years, and four in the last four months. The Colombians are not talking about any new air reconnaissance methods they may be using to spot these stealthy craft, or if they are getting assistance from the U.S. (something like long range heat sensors perhaps).

 

The air force has increased it patrols, specifically looking for such craft. The air force then calls in a the navy to attempt a capture. The subs, made of fiberglass, are constructed by the drug gangs, using technicians and materials brought in for the purpose. This costs several hundred thousand dollars per boat. Which is not so bad when you consider that each voyage moves a cargo worth $100 million or more. The craft are from 50-80 feet in length, have a crew of three or four, and carry 3-10 tons of cocaine up the coast to Central America, or farther north.

 

These are not submarines in the true sense of the word, but "semi-submersibles". The fiberglass boats, powered by a diesel engine, have a small "conning tower" above the water, providing the crew, and engine, with fresh air, and permitting the crew to navigate the boat. A boat of this type is the only practical kind of "submarine" for drug smuggling. A real submarine would be much more difficult to build, although you can buy commercial subs for a million dollars or so. These, however, can carry only a few hundred pounds of cargo, and not for long distances.

 

 The main problem with real subs is that they are not much more effective than the "semi-submersibles" that are coming out of Colombia (and even Europe).  Submarines can only travel underwater, on battery power, for a short time. Otherwise, they are on the surface, or in a "semi-submersible" state, running on diesel power.

 

 So the drug gangs had the right idea, but their "sub" was not stealthy enough to avoid detection all the time. However, it appears that these "semi-submersibles" do work, because the drug gangs keep using them. Most of them are apparently getting through. Delivery by sea is now the favored method for cocaine smugglers, because the United States has deployed military grade aircraft detection systems, and caught too many of the airborne drug shipments. The smugglers did their math, and realized that improvised "submarines" were a more cost-effective way to go.

 

 

 

Next Article → ATTRITION: Judge Grounds Dodgy Bombers
  

Show Only Poster Name and Title     Newest to Oldest
geekynerd    Cheap AIP   1/10/2008 11:31:48 AM
With all the work being done on batteries, ultra-capacitors and fuel-cells for civilian transportation (and other) uses I have to wonder how long it will be until a true submersible will be viable for these groups?

If they're rate of loss is going up dramatically due to better surveillance then this will make more expensive propulsion systems (such as fuel cells) and full submersion ability more cost effective.

Will enforcement then need to move to a SOSUS-type system combined with airial surveillance to look for propeller sounds that don't correspond to surface craft or will they still be shallow enough that thermal output will make them visible?  Even if they had to be surfaced to recharge for say 8 hours out of 24 it would make detection harder right?

 
Quote    Reply

ker    Piracy   1/10/2008 2:27:20 PM
  " This costs several hundred thousand dollars per boat. Which is not so bad when you consider that each voyage moves a cargo worth $100 million or more. "
 
With a small crew, limited weapons and "cargo worth $100 million or more" these boats look like perfect targets for pirates.  When the pirates attack they are not obligated to fish crew of the boat out of the water so the deal would be give us the boat intact or die.  Sinking the boat is easy, ram the snorkel.  Do the cartels have a truce to not hit each other in this way? Could some vigilante cause them to fear the truce had been broken? 
 
Would a bounty be quietly paid for parts or photos of a captured boat?
 
Quote    Reply

gf0012-aust       1/10/2008 5:29:05 PM

With all the work being done on batteries, ultra-capacitors and fuel-cells for civilian transportation (and other) uses I have to wonder how long it will be until a true submersible will be viable for these groups?
Some USV's are already able to endure 36hr journeys. The future includes dismounted weapons capability for the next generation of subs, so I guess the answer is not that far away...

 
Quote    Reply

FJV       1/11/2008 12:05:56 PM
I think a true submersible is already viable for these groups if they can make it unmanned.
The thing has to go from drugsdealer group A to drugsdealer groub B with a load of drugs.

By making the thing unmanned there are a lot of benefits.
- You can eliminate the complexity of air for the crew.
- You can make the sub smaller because no crew has to fit in there.
- Chances of arrest are reduced when the drugs are picked up and delivered. During the voyage you may lose the submersible, but there is no crew that can get arrested.

The difficulty is making the thing navigate correctly and avoid collisions, but with modern day commercial electronics that should not be impossible to do. In the worst case scenario you'ld have to run a small antenna to the surface for the GPS reciever.

"http://www.jeklink.net/projects/GPS_Equipped_Radio_Controlled_Sailplane.html"



 
Quote    Reply