Counter-Terrorism Article Index : Current 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics
Fake Fingerprints For Sale
   Next Article → NAVAL AIR: The Forever Ships
January 11, 2009: Japan has admitted that its new biometric immigration control system has been breached. The first known incident occurred eight months ago, when a South Korean women, who had been deported in 2007 for overstaying her visa, slipped back in. She has been barred from returning for five years. She successfully got past the fingerprint system by purchasing a forged passport in South Korea, and getting with it a clear tape to put over her finger. The tape contained a fingerprint of someone who was not in the Japanese database. The tape worked, just as it has been shown working on TV shows and movies for years. The woman was later picked up inside Japan, and police figured out how she had evaded the emigration controls.

While Japan has halted 846 unwelcome foreigners using the fingerprint system, they are unsure of how many others made it through illegally, using the tape technique. While the biometric system is mainly for keeping out common criminals or those who are, for whatever reason, not welcome, it is also used to keep terrorists out. This won't be the case as long as passport forgers can also get away with the "fingerprint on a tape" trick. Some biometric systems are designed, in theory, to detect the use of tape. No word yet on whether those systems have been deceived as well.

Next Article → NAVAL AIR: The Forever Ships
  

Show Only Poster Name and Title     Newest to Oldest
matisse    Faing fingerprints at home, for fun and for profit   1/11/2009 3:42:26 PM
There are many examples of this, but here is one:
 

Impact of Artificial "Gummy" Fingers on Fingerprint Systems

Tsutomu Matsumoto
Hiroyuki Matsumoto
Koji Yamada
Satoshi Hoshino

Graduate School of Environment and Information Sciences
Yokohama National University 
 
 

 
Quote    Reply

ker       1/11/2009 10:00:58 PM
Consider the other direction for application of this.  A printer type device that "prints' finger prints onto tape which than can be pressed on to surfaces and pealed back.  What it leaves is a finger print.  Most ways of raising questions about the print would be to expensive for civil servants.
 
Quote    Reply

Vulture       1/12/2009 11:01:52 AM

Consider the other direction for application of this.  A printer type device that "prints' finger prints onto tape which than can be pressed on to surfaces and pealed back.  What it leaves is a finger print.  Most ways of raising questions about the print would be to expensive for civil servants.

Ummm no.
 
GCMS analysis is not really expensive to confirm hundreds of dollars per test
And a field test kit would only have to detect polymers instead of the proper human oils that make up a fingerprint.
 
Hell a blood hound would be able to tell the difference.   fingerprint sniffing dogs.  Will it PO PETA?
 
 

 
Quote    Reply

ker       1/15/2009 6:20:14 PM



Consider the other direction for application of this.  A printer type device that "prints' finger prints onto tape which than can be pressed on to surfaces and pealed back.  What it leaves is a finger print.  Most ways of raising questions about the print would be to expensive for civil servants.





Ummm no.

 

GCMS analysis is not really expensive to confirm hundreds of dollars per test

And a field test kit would only have to detect polymers instead of the proper human oils that make up a fingerprint.


 

Hell a blood hound would be able to tell the difference.   fingerprint sniffing dogs.  Will it PO PETA?


 

 





"only have to detect polymers instead of the proper human oils that make up a fingerprint."
 
Fingerprints can be made of many ink like substances.  A victims blood being one of the most compelling.  The presence of "Polymers" in the print could be less than conclusive in many circumstances including if the print was made on a plastic surface.  If you do DNA testing on the "human oils" that make up some prints it could have evidencary value.  The volume of the sample is small to the point that DNA testing will likely not become standard practice on fingerprints.  (soon)
 
Quote    Reply