My comments below, followed by a retort from a fellow poster. How valid is this notion? I see little evidence to this effect, particularly after 1941, nor do I sense any possibility of this notion emerging in the U.S. Armed Forces, given the continued size of our military and the consequent demands that requires for competent officer-grade talent? Was this the case prior to 1941, when, with the notable exceptions of our Civil War and W.W.I, our armies had been small, and our officer corps was effectively a select club generated by the service academies?
I look forward to your thoughts.
" I'm not worried about the development of an "officer caste" and "warrior class" in this nation. Nor should you.
Why not?
Small wars tend to do that. Even in the brief interlude between 1870-1917 (Reconstruction to World War I) we had pretty much what seemed to approach a steady "Officer Class" -- do the names MacArthur and Patton ring a bell, perhaps? I mean the generals from Spanish American War and Phillipines - two classic Small Wars.
Serious question - if it hadnt been for the two world wars, would we have been able to make space for Eisenhowers and Bradleys in pages occupied by MacArthurs and Pattons?
Just something to ponder over. |