Military History | How To Make War | Wars Around the World Rules of Use How to Behave on an Internet Forum
Leadership Discussion Board
   Return to Topic Page
Subject: Was Jimmy Carter the worst president in the 20th century?
usajoe1    7/16/2009 11:54:52 PM
To me he was, and this is why. Foreign policy: 1) The Iran crises. Carter threw the Shah ubder the bus, and is responsible for the transformation of Iran, from a US ally, into an enemy of the US. Subsequently, he is responsible for the Iran, Iraq war, which was a result of the revolution. A million Iranians and Iraq's died because of Carters inaction. The hostage crises was the biggest black eye of his presidency, but one should not forget all the other mifortunate events that occurred from his inaction in the Iran. 2)Carter is also known as a moral men that stood for freedom, equality and justice, but this is not all true either. This is a men that supported a lot of criminial dictators through out his time in office and afterwards as well. The list goes something like this: Robert Mugabe, Ortega, the PLO thug Arafat, and more recantly, Castro, and Chavez. 3)Giving away the Panama Cana. This was an American asset, that almost 30,000 men died while constructing it. 4) Gutting our military to the point where it was in the worst condition in its entire cold war history. 5) Giving pardon to draft dogers of the Vietnam war. This was a disgraceful act by a desgraceful president. Economy: Presided over the worst economy in the US since the GD. 1)from 1976-1980 inflation was any where from 7 to 13% and unemployment 6-7%. 2) Job loss was the worst since the GD. 3) worst energy crises OF THE 20th century. Conclusion: A peanut farmer, that should of stayed in his farm. This was a president that could not do any thing right, and yet the liberal left hold this incompetent ex-president up so high, that one might think he was Washington or Lincoln.
 
Quote    Reply

Show Only Poster Name and Title     Newest to Oldest
swhitebull       7/17/2009 9:26:10 AM
Is there any doubt?
 
And BHO is running  a close second these days.
 
A little dated, but still a scathing indictment of Carter, just add in another 7 years of his perfidious, bigotted behavior ro bring you up to date on his vileness, venality and vindictiveness:
 
from Jay Nordlinger, National Review:
 
 
 
swhitebull -  dont get me started on that reformed racist and antiSemite.
 
Quote    Reply

WarNerd       7/17/2009 7:18:42 PM
It's always fun in discussions of current politics to casually mention how much Obama reminds you of Jimmy Carter.  Sneak a look around when you do this, the Obama supporters will be the ones with fear in their eyes.
 
Quote    Reply

usajoe1       7/17/2009 11:59:03 PM
I think you greatly overestimate Carters influence ...  Carters actions may have contributed to the Shah failing, but after all he was in line with the Dictators you mention later in your post.  Joe you have to decide if supporting a Dictatorship is good or bad, you cant blame Carter in one sentence for dropping a Dictator and in the other hold him responsible for supporting other ones in the next sentence. 

I know the Shah was not the best leader out there, but he was ten times better than what came afterwards. I'm just saying that his inactions led to a US freindly government being overthrown by a radical islamic government. This inaction also caused the Iran-Iraq war a couple of years later, which almost a million, men, women and children died as a result. Now as far as the dictarors, this men supported and still supports, Marxis dictators that consider America an enemy. The Shah was freindly to the US, and as bad as some people may say he was, he was not Khomeini, or the criminals running the country now.

 

 
 
Quote    Reply



 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics