The Strategypage is a comprehensive summary of military news and affairs.
 News As History - November 23, 2008

Dunnigan's and Bay's Latest

Advertisement



New Strategy - Wargames at Discount Prices
1.Squad Battles: Winter War
2.Silent War
3.Manoeuvre
4.Gallic Wars
5.Fast Action Battle: The Bulge

100+ Computer and Board games all with free shipping.
 
 
 

Online Giving

Utah SEO Firm

Xango

Smiley Gifts for Babies

Military History | How To Make War | Wars Around the World Rules of Use
Submarines Discussion Board
Sign In   Return to Topic Page
Subject: Subs and their value
RaptorZ    3/3/2007 12:30:25 AM
I got to ask this question, Germany was big into Submarines for WWII and they didn't really prove to be much of a force. So why the current love with Subs by so many countries including China. It seems China is expanding their fleet greatly here, is it just b/c they are harder to detect so they stand a chance?

To me it's just an attempt to get a first strike capability and who cares there after.

Thoughts
 
Quote    Reply
 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics

Email Me When A New Comment Is Made
Show Only Poster Name and Title     Sort in Reverse Order Posted

RockyMTNClimber    Value   3/3/2007 12:33:54 PM

I got to ask this question, Germany was big into Submarines for WWII and they didn't really prove to be much of a force. ARGH! Twice in twenty years Gernamy brought Great Britain to her knees with Submarine Blockades!So why the current love with Subs by so many countries including China. It seems China is expanding their fleet greatly here, is it just b/c they are harder to detect so they stand a chance? China hopes to deploy enough high quality SSK & SSN boats to drive the US Pacific fleet away from Taiwan in the openning days of a shooting match. Used as part of an integrated force of ballistic missiles,Attack Subs, Ballistic Nuclear Missile Subs, asymetric warfare, economic warfare. & a threat of large scale invasions they hope to drive the Taiwanese political environment to concede their freedom and fall under communist slavery. Failing political blackmail, the Chinese hope to have a credable force to actually carry out the attacks (with a little help from a liberal Democrat party in the US). Their long term "asian" view of this is inscrudible.

If the PAC RIM allies hang tough (AUS,JPN,US,TAI,SK,NZ) the chinese will not succeed in this.

To me it's just an attempt to get a first strike capability and who cares there after. The Taiwanese.

Thoughts
Subs are a great value.
Check Six
 
Rocky

 
Quote    Reply

Herald1234    Submarines are the weapon of choice for pirates and brigands.   3/3/2007 12:52:32 PM
Rocky summed it up best. Look at who goes in big for subs. Subs sink ships and hit land targets via sneak attack. If you were a PRC and had to reduce Guam and deter the Seventh Fleet, you have two choices, IRBM  or  a submarine.

Use an IRBM and the D-5s are in the air. Even Hilarity understands  ballistic  missile attack and Pearl Harbor syndrome. I presume the bastards in Beijing do too.

However if you use a few popup cruise missiles to damage the airbase on Guam and put a couple of torpedoes into the Teddy Roosevelt, you might make the guys in Washington wonder if Taiwan is worth the effort.

As for the other riffraff, they buy submarines because they think a submarine is the poor man's answer to the US Marines paying them a visit.

Nobody aside from the Dutch, Italians, British, Russian, Germans, or Americans have used submarines the way they are supposed to be used.

And of those only the Dutch, British, Italians, and Americans have successful wartime campaigns to show the result.

Subs kill merchant shipping trade and are the preferred patrol blockade weapon of choice.

Fortunately for us, most of the 300+ D/E sub riffraff pests that urgently need killing are in the hands of total incompetents who have trouble reading the owner's manuals on the boats they bought.

Herald



 
Quote    Reply

RockyMTNClimber    Taiwan   3/3/2007 1:09:09 PM
While I am ranting about Taiwan, it is a crime that the western world powers have not allowed the Taiwanese to update and expand their submarine force to counter China's open and unabashed aggression against a peaceful western partner.
 
They have offered to pay for their own boats from any western source that will provide them and China has been allowed to block that at all corners. The United States, Germany, France, Italy, Sweden, and all other boat makers should be ashamed of themselves for allowing China to do that while China is buying Kilo's by the dozen in order to place a hangman's noose around an free island nation. Even the Israeli's get new German boats subsidized by the German consciences. At least Taiwan is willing to pay its own way!
 
Let them defend themselves!
 
Check Six
 
Rocky
 
Quote    Reply

french stratege       3/3/2007 1:26:18 PM
Subs are the only platform to carry attack with some chance agaisnt a more powerfull navy opponent outside the range of ground aviation.
A sub is a stealthy platform.
A surface fleet has no chance outside shallow water agaisnt an other surface fleet including a real carrier.
A single carrier assuming it is carrying a good stock of antiship missile, with only half of dozen of frigates in protection, is stronguer than a fleet of 50 high tech frigates without a carrier since the long range of aircraft, allow them to strike unpunished the frigate fleet several times.
A navy has no value, except to check fishers and smugglers,  outside carrier and subs and more particularly its SSN.
 
 
Quote    Reply

HIPAR       3/9/2007 10:55:38 AM
Don't forget about clandestine operations.

---  CHAS

 
Quote    Reply

Nanheyangrouchuan       3/9/2007 11:14:41 AM
Subs didn't work as well as they could have in WW2 because of the limitations of subs which required them to spend alot of time above water.  One plane with primitve radar could find the periscope. 
And the Germans used them on supply ships, so if you had a convoy you knew subs would be in the area, no question.

As for Taiwan, part of our holding back is not to give Taiwan too much tech that might end up in PLA hands, part of it is realpolitik regarding our relations with China but a big part of the problem is due to US MNCs pandering and kowtowing to Beijing at every opportunity.  Just look at the way Paulson behaves...like some expat punk telling the chinese how great and wonderful they are because that's all he knows how to do.  And quite a bit of the realpolitik of our relationship with China is based on commercial pressures.

Nixon just should've left China alone.

 
Quote    Reply

Yimmy       3/9/2007 4:19:57 PM
Germany also used powerful surface raiders with good success against convoys et al, not just U boats.
 
In the context of "Sink the Bismark!", today, with Germany replaced by China, and the Bismark replaced with (a fully functioning) Kirov class battlecruiser - would this be a major threat?
 
Of course surface ships are very vulnerable to air-attack and submarines.  But then the Kirov does have upwards of four organic ASW choppers, and a very powerful SAM armament (with the missiles in the hundreds, with something like four tiers).
 
 
Quote    Reply

scuttlebut steve       3/10/2007 2:39:49 AM

Germany also used powerful surface raiders with good success against convoys et al, not just U boats.

 

In the context of "Sink the Bismark!", today, with Germany replaced by China, and the Bismark replaced with (a fully functioning) Kirov class battlecruiser - would this be a major threat?

 

Of course surface ships are very vulnerable to air-attack and submarines.  But then the Kirov does have upwards of four organic ASW choppers, and a very powerful SAM armament (with the missiles in the hundreds, with something like four tiers).

 


I would question how well the russian fire control systems can cope with several sea skimming missiles at the same time from ships and aircraft, and the older submariners ive talked to werent very impressed with russian ASW capabilities (to say the least), and most of these guys were off of sturgeon classes, let alone modern LA's.  A kirov running loose would probably not fare much better than the bismark (most advanced german battleship manages 1 sunk WW1 era battlecruiser before being sunk)
 
Quote    Reply

kirby1       3/12/2007 8:40:48 AM
In my opinion, the only true weakness that a sub has is a political weakness. They do not possess a true "Fleet in Being" intimidation factor, nor  a way to ramp up aggression. Take, for example an CBG. Enemy nation starts talking smack, we park a CVN off thier coast to show them we're paying attention. They continue thier acts of aggression, the CBG starts up some wargames to show them that we mean business. They start acting all hostile like, and carrier aircraft run a few reconassaince runs to remind them that thier airspace isn't sacrosanct, and that camera pods can be switched to PGMs quite easily.
 
A sub can't do anything like that. It lurks, it hides,and when it takes action, it goes either totally unnoticed, or it is a fullblown act of war. Enemy Captains realize the threat, and remember the General Belgrano, but enemy politicians have a harder time understanding the implications.
 
Otherwise, subs are the best bundle of cash a navy can buy.
 
Quote    Reply

StrategyWorld.com© 1998 - 2008StrategyWorld.com. All rights Reserved. StrategyWorld.com, StrategyPage.com, FYEO, For Your Eyes Only and Al Nofi's CIC are all trademarks of StrategyWorld.com Privacy Policy