Now dos this put them ahead technically of the Collins?

Different subs, different design fundamentals.  RAN decided against AIP, Stirling module was bought for T&E and excluded. RAN/ASC view was that there was no demonstrable advantage for Collins due to existing efficiencies.  The Stirling AIP module is sitting on a pallet as an overgrown paperweight.

 

Re Oyashios, an extra 700 tonnes of difference means that they have changed more than inserting an AIP module.  They could have inserted Stirling into the existing hull if pushed.

 

There are certainly design elements and capabilities in the Oyashios that I'd like to see in Collins.

 

They still don't have the sig management advantages though......

 

 

The Stirling AIP module is sitting on a pallet as an overgrown paperweight.

 

I suspect that a few things will happen:

 

- there will be some interaction with the japanese navy to gauge their opinion (there are closer relations between RAN and JMSDF now), comparisons will be made on their AIP Stirling assessment, and RANs

- the engine will be used in new tests for Collins 2.  Collins 2 will have AIP as there is a vision for it to have a different long range mission profile

Nice to see the name Soryu perpetuated!

 

And one one of the new Kongo AEGIS's is an Amagi

 

Does anyone know what the name of the new "DDH"s/CVLs will be?

 

Akagi?

Hiryu?

Shokaku?

Zuikaku?

Zuiho?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

JMSDF DDH 16 HYUUGA ?ú?ü

 

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/72/JMSDF_DDH_181_Hyuga.jpg/800px-JMSDF_DDH_181_Hyuga.jpg" width=717 border=0>