The Strategypage is a comprehensive summary of military news and affairs.
 News As History - November 23, 2008

Dunnigan's and Bay's Latest

Advertisement



New Strategy - Wargames at Discount Prices
1.Squad Battles: Winter War
2.Silent War
3.Manoeuvre
4.Gallic Wars
5.Fast Action Battle: The Bulge

100+ Computer and Board games all with free shipping.
 
 
 

Online Giving

Utah SEO Firm

Xango

Smiley Gifts for Babies

Military History | How To Make War | Wars Around the World Rules of Use
Submarines Discussion Board
Sign In   Return to Topic Page
Subject: Dems Nix Conventional Trident Missile
Softwar    3/10/2008 8:45:47 AM
Aviation Week & Space Technology
03/10/2008 , page 19

Congress has made it clear that the submarine-based, conventionally armed Trident missile (CTM) is ?a capability they would not like to see deployed,? says USAF Gen. Kevin Chilton, chief of U.S. Strategic Command. On the other hand, ?we?re learning more as we continue to develop the technologies we need for prompt global strike that could be land-based.? A new analysis of alternatives is considering a land-based option; a forward-deployed, shorter-range mobile option; a sea-based option; and then a very-high-velocity, air-breathing delivery mechanism, he says. Flight demonstrations with the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency are planned for 2011 or beyond. While the larger concept of fielding a sea-based, conventional ICBM is still an option, Congress has rejected the idea of ?using the CTM proposal of a mixed [nuclear, conventional] loadout [on submarines],? he says. ?That doesn?t slow us down from working on technologies for conventional weapons [that include] high accuracy, and material properties that allow the reentry vehicle to do large cross-range maneuvering.? That way, the RVs ?can reach targets without overflying countries that you [don?t want] getting excited.?
 
Quote    Reply
 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics

Email Me When A New Comment Is Made
Show Only Poster Name and Title     Sort in Reverse Order Posted

DarthAmerica       3/15/2008 2:53:47 PM
Basically the USN could field this capability almost overnight BUT congress is too p*ssy to do it. It's transformational weapons like this we need for 21st century wars. One way or another we will get it. Since everybody is so scared lets just do the Rods From God bombardment constellation. Only problem is the orbits necessary to meet the time requirements for PROMPT GLOBAL STRIKE would decay so fast that we would need to spend a fortune to maintain it.



-DA

 
Quote    Reply

kensohaski       3/20/2008 8:02:36 AM
There is only one thing that scares me about these things.  That of mistaken identity.  What if a potential enemy mistakes an ICBM launch for a nuke?  I need to see more evidence that will not happen...
 
Quote    Reply

StrategyWorld.com© 1998 - 2008StrategyWorld.com. All rights Reserved. StrategyWorld.com, StrategyPage.com, FYEO, For Your Eyes Only and Al Nofi's CIC are all trademarks of StrategyWorld.com Privacy Policy