Military History | How To Make War | Wars Around the World Rules of Use How to Behave on an Internet Forum
Dirty Little Secrets Discussion Board
   Return to Topic Page
Subject: XM8 Put to Sleep
James Dunnigan    12/1/2005 12:17:35 AM


The XM8, the U.S. Army?s design for a new assault rifle and light machine-gun, has been cancelled. Actually, the project was put on hold last July. At the time, the reason was believed to be the ongoing debate over whether a new caliber (6.8mm was most often mentioned) should be adopted. While the XM8 used more modern engineering, and was lighter and more reliable, it was basically an improved M-16, just another 5.56mm assault rifle. Meanwhile, SOCOM adopted another new 5.56mm design (SCAR), while the U.S. Marine Corps decided to stay with the M-16 in the future. The XM8 may be revived, in another caliber. But for now, the army does not want to spend several billion bucks on a new assault rifle. Better to wait until the war in Iraq dies down, and radically new weapons, like the 25mm XM-25, hit the field, and pile up some combat experience. Basically, the army believes there are better alternatives than the XM8, but are not sure exactly what these alternatives are.
 
Quote    Reply

Show Only Poster Name and Title     Newest to Oldest
sjdoc    RE:XM8 Put to Sleep    12/1/2005 11:39:32 AM
Are there significant advantages to the 6.8 x 43 mm round that do not accrue to much the same extent with the older 7.62 X 51 mm NATO cartridge? Many sources extoll the value of the 6.8 mm round (among which see http://www.defensereview.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=383), but the 5.56 x 45 mm NATO round (bearing a 62-grain bullet) is not going to "wash out" of U.S. or international inventories for a very long time (if ever), and the logistic complexities of adding yet another ammunition type to the acquisitions process and to the battlefield inventory might be daunting.
 
Quote    Reply



 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics