Military History | How To Make War | Wars Around the World Rules of Use How to Behave on an Internet Forum
Dirty Little Secrets Discussion Board
   Return to Topic Page
Subject: Outsourcing Combat Reporting to the Enemy
James Dunnigan    10/5/2006 12:26:35 AM
U.S. troops continue to be mystified at the odd reporting coming out of Iraq. What the troops witnessed is not what reporters are sending back. The bylines on those stories are American, as are the talking heads they see broadcasting from Baghdad. Some troops attribute the inaccurate reporting to bias, with journalists sending back what they want to be the truth, rather than what is actually happening. The troops see a very different Iraq from the one journalists are reporting. But the fact of the matter is that few of these journalists are reporting much. On any given day, fewer than a dozen reporters are embedded with combat units, and actually out there. A third or more of these are working for military oriented publications ("Stars and Stripes," Armed Forces Network). Most journalists are in the Green Zone, or some well-guarded hotel. There, they depend on Iraqi stringers to gather information, and take pictures for them. In reality, these reporters could do this from back home, and many more media organizations are doing just that. Nothing new about using local stringers in dangerous areas. It's common sense, given that the bad guys are in the habit of kidnapping, or just killing, foreign reporters. The problem is, the pool of available Iraqi talent is mostly Sunni Arab. Many of these folks side with the bad guys. And all Iraqi journalists, especially those working for foreigners, are subject to intimidation, or bribery. While some of the foreign reporters may be aware of all this, some aren't, and many of the rest don't care. The truth won't set them free, but supplying stories their editors are looking for, will. It wasn't always this way, but that's the way it is these days. And, sadly, about the only people to notice the problem are the many troops who have been in Iraq, and don't have an editor telling them what to think, and report.
 
Quote    Reply

Show Only Poster Name and Title     Newest to Oldest
sclayton    Sounding silly again   10/9/2006 11:14:20 PM
Jim,

This op-ed piece is a prime example of the constant
background drumbeat on Strategy page: the Media gets it
wrong, the media is undermining the war effort, the reporters
don't care, editors are anti war, the baaa, baaa, baaa.

It seems to all be part of the set up for the
"I told you so" moaning in the eventual "Who Lost Iraq"
finger pointing game after the USA pulls out.  We
would have, could have  "won" except we were sold out by
the left wing, European loving, fascist hugger Mainstream Media.

Guys - the media is not causing the USA to lose
the war.  The politicians saw to that over the past
few years by refusing to commit sufficient forces to do
the job and declining to mobilize the American people.
The Bush administration certainly has been told what
needs to be done to create the conditions for military
victory, but for political reasons won't take the
necessary action. They aren't dumb: they are so
hog-tied by politics that they are ineffective.

Your op-ed depicts an awkward fantasy vision of what
the news and commentary Media do in a free enterprise
based democracy. The Mainstream Media consists of 
big businesses and they do what they can to make a profit.
Media entertainers like Rush and O'Reilly say what they
need to say in the stylized way they need to say it to
earn their tens of millions - and make hundreds of millions
for their Mainstream Media employers. Americans can read Strategy
Page and the New York times,  and letters from their friends
serving in Iraq and make up their own minds.

Why doesn't your idealized version of the true and good news
get in the Mainstream US Media?  Could it be the American
people have never been effectively mobilized behind this
particular war and do not really care to hear any news about
it? Face it: the war is page 9 news now. The mosh pit of
Iraqi politics get more column inches than combat. 

Those lazy, cowardly Reporters are tied to the green zone?
Virtually every foreigner in Iraq, reporters, military,
contractors, US government employees, business people,
lives in a fortified secure location, the green zone fort
if they can get in.  To do anything else would be foolishly
disregarding their personal safety.  The reporters are too
dimwitted to understand that Sunni stringers probably have
a pro Sunni bias and unthinkingly write everything they
are told by the bad guys - uhh right.

Frankly, the "Good news doesn't sell papers, the true story
just never gets told" refrain is worn out and, in the case of
Iraq, just does not ring true.  Fox News and Limbaugh both
somehow seem to be part of the don't report the good news
gang. What is the "good" news?  The best I can think of is
that the Kurds were the first winner of the Iraq civil war
and have established a de facto independent state. That
has been adequately reported.

Look back over the last 2 years. How many articles and
rants on just Strategy Page have beat the long deceased
horse of "the Media is selling out our victory,"
"the media is fronting for the enemy," "the Media wants the
USA to lose," or "all the reporters are too darn stupid
(or lazy or left wing or snobbish) to understand what us
smart guys with the inner knowledge know is true." 


It is your web site, so you can devalue it by adding in your
political views as much as you want. It is more interesting when
it stick to the facts. Strategy Page's editor has  aped
something from the Mainstream media. SP's headlines often
disregard the facts in the articles and seem to reflect what the
writer wishes the facts were rather than what is written.
You titled your little article "Outsourcing Combat
Reporting to the Enemy."  It makes you, and Strategy Page,
seem silly.

 
Quote    Reply



 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics