Ballistic Missile Defence: ANZAC Style -
The proliferation of missiles and related technologies in Asia is a growing concern for Australia and as stated by other posters Australia's localized population centers and defence assets are exceptionally venerable to missile attack. Ballistic missiles in particular are a major concern to Australia, when tipped with conventional high explosive warheads, or especially nuclear, chemical, or biological warheads, they present a combination of capabilities and destructive power unmatched by any other weapon.  Our limited strategic deterrents and lack of indigenous nuclear capability places us in an extremely high risk category.
This also indicates that we would be prime first strike target due the presence of important US Communications bases and the inability to instantly respond with tactical nuclear weapons.

Defence planners and politicians should seriously consider these factors, wouldn't you agree?

 The unique maritime environment in Australia's battle-space and the fact that our population is majority located around the coast suggests that we should look toward a majority sea based system, with a small number of land based systems Let's say three

- Southern Eastern Australia (Defence Industry infrastructure/population centers)
i.e.  SA/VIC/Southern NSW
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Far North Queensland/Central QLD -Airbases etc
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
- NT ( Pine gap-ADF Bases etc)
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Early warning long range detection radar based in NZ (less venerable to first strike) NZ is less likely to be on Axis of Evil and other first strike target lists.

These land based systems provide a platform for Australia to R&D indigenous space and ASAT program.

Sydney and Perth both house fleet bases, meaning AWD based there would most likely be able to protect those cities.

Cant those fools in tower see that? (LOL quote from Iron Eagle)

Iran test-fires more missiles

 ?Brisbane times

July 10, 2008 - 7:52PM

Iran test-fired more weapons as it continued war games on Thursday in defiance of global concern over its launch of a broadside of missiles in the midst of efforts to end the nuclear crisis.

State television said the weapons fired in the Gulf by the naval section of the elite Revolutionary Guards included shore-to-sea, surface-to-surface and sea-to-air missiles.

It said the war games also included the firing of the Hoot (Whale) torpedo that Iran unveiled in April 2006 which it described then as a super-fast weapon capable of hitting enemy submarines.

Iran on Wednesday test-fired its Shahab-3 longer range missile, whose range includes Israel and US bases in the Gulf, and eight other more medium range missiles.

The move caused major concern in Western governments which fear Iran's nuclear drive is aimed at making atomic weapons, a charge that Tehran vehemently denies.

State television also said that Wednesday night more "longer and medium range missiles were fired" in night-time land maneuvers. Pictures broadcast showed several missiles being fired into the night sky.

It was not clear exactly when the naval maneuvers were held.

After a warning from an aide to supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei that Iran would "set fire" to Israel and US ships in the Gulf if it was attacked, US Secretary Condoleezza Rice warned that the United States would defend itself.

"We will defend American interests and the interests of our allies. We take very strongly our obligation to defend our allies and we intend to do that," she told reporters in Tbilisi.

Crude oil prices rose once again in Asian trade as the market feared a regional conflict that could disrupt supplies from Iran, OPEC's number two producer.

The chief of French oil giant Total Christophe de Margerie said it was too politically risky to invest Iran at present, as Western governments lean on commercial firms to cut their ties with the Islamic republic.

His remarks appeared to spell the end of Total's involvement in a deal to exploit the phase 11 of Iran's giant South Pars gas field to produce liquefied natural gas (LNG) for export and to build a liquefaction plant.

"Today we would be taking too much political risk to invest in Iran because people will say: 'Total will do anything for money'," de Margerie told the Financial Times.

The United States, which has never ruled out military action against Iranian atomic facilities, condemned the missile tests.

"Iran's development of ballistic missiles is a violation of United Nations Security Council resolutions and completely inconsistent with Iran's obligations to the world," White House spokesman Gordon Johndroe said.

There has been concern an attack against Iran could be imminent after it emerged Israel had carried out manoeuvres in Greece that were effectively dry runs for a potential strike against Iranian nuclear facilities.

But US Defence Secretary Robert Gates played down the risks of conflict.

"The reality is there is a lot of signalling going on, but everybody recognises what the consequences of any kind of a conflict would be," he said.

The war games come in the midst of increased diplomatic efforts to end the five-year stand-off over the Iranian nuclear drive.

Iran has responded to an offer from world powers to end the crisis, and diplomats are analysing what is said to be a complex answer from Tehran.

EU foreign policy chief Javier Solana is expected to hold talks with top Iranian nuclear negotiator Saeed Jalili on the latest proposals by the end of the month, Solana's spokeswoman said.

The offer proposes that Iran suspend uranium enrichment - the key sticking point in the crisis and the process which the West fears could be used to make a nuclear weapon - in exchange for technological incentives.

However, France says Iran does not say in its response that it is prepared to suspend uranium enrichment.