Military History | How To Make War | Wars Around the World Rules of Use How to Behave on an Internet Forum
Commandos and Special Operations Discussion Board
   Return to Topic Page
Subject: NAVY SEALS VS BRITISH SAS
LJ813    7/1/2005 9:34:17 PM
I WILL GO FOR THE NAVY..
 
Quote    Reply

Show Only Poster Name and Title     Newest to Oldest
gf0012-aust       12/26/2007 5:17:51 AM

and SAS ( special air services) is air.but there anit nothing special about jumping halo or haho now the water is a different story.


maybe you should do some homework before presenting ill informed opinion as fact. The SAS is a corp divided up into 3 regiments.
One regiment includes sabre squadrons.  each squadron includes a number(usually 4) of sixteen man troops.  each troop has a speciality /functional responsibility.  They are divided into an Air Troop, Boat Troop, Mobility Troop, and Mountain Troop.
 
the other regiments have discrete roles.
 
The name is a legacy of its historical foundation - not an exclusivity of mode of operation.

 
 
Quote    Reply

the British Lion       12/26/2007 3:18:14 PM
"The name is a legacy of its historical foundation - not an exclusivity of mode of operation."

Someone correct me if I'm wrong on this, but was the name not intended to trick German inteligince into thinking the SAS was just an airborne unit and thus nothing particularly dangerous/special?

Regards,

B.L.
 
Quote    Reply

KimberCustom2       1/23/2008 1:00:28 AM
 What I can tell you is after reading books like The Warrior Elite, The Finishing School, and Lone Survivor,  it is clear that navy SEALs are very hard working dedicated professionals with some of the toughest training ever devised . Contrary to belief, the SEALs are one of the premier land warfare units in the world. The SEALs are not the same old UDTs from the 50s and 60s. Most of their training is land based and although they are still experts in the water, and view it as a safe heaven, they are moving further and further away from just being a maritime force.  In operation redwing 4 SEALs were stumbled upon by goat herders. Instead of killing them, they let the non-combatant herders go. Soon 150+  taliban fighters were attacking them, with the advantage in numbers as well as terrain, being above them on a hill in the hindu kush. The 4 SEALs killed 100+ of the enemy fighters, some of them being wounded as many as five times, but never quitting. One of them was awarded the MOH for running into the open while under heavy fire so he could call in support for his men with a cell phone. Marcus luttrell was the only survivor and he managed to evade miles while severely wounded, all the while avoiding enemy patrols. Bottom line, The SEALs train to be the best at everything they do. It is drilled into them from day 1 at indoc that it pays to be a winner, because in their line of work, 2nd place means death. Saying "SEALs can swim far but cant run as well" is stupid because its just not true. If you read a book about BUD/s or ever talk to a SEAL you will see they run and swim to the point of physical collapse, and then some. And it doesn't get easier after Hellweek. Contrary to what some people think BUD/s just gets harder and harder after hellweek. Besides, BUD/s is just a ticket to get a seat at the table to attend SQT (SEAL Qualification Training) This is another 4 months of extremely tough training. Then if you pass you go on to medic training or sdv training. Then after all this, you are assigned to a SEAL platoon. This is where the most difficult and advanced training takes place. A platoon normally trains for an additional 12-15 months and is then deployed. After all that you are still an fng.  I'm not saying the SEALs are better than anyone else, but when it comes down to it, I dont see how you can be better or more efficient than them, because what ever level the bar is raised to, the SEALs always clear it. As a side note,  Delta Force is possibly very similar to the SAS, or at least it was when it was formed. Beckwith trained with the SAS and he copied their structure to form Delta. Chances are, their structure has since changed. If you want to compare Delta Selection and training with the SAS's read Eric Haneys novel "Inside Delta Force", and then read a book describing the SAS selection and training. I would bet money that they are both VERY similar.
 
Quote    Reply

bob the brit       1/23/2008 3:56:37 PM

 What I can tell you is after reading books like The Warrior Elite, The Finishing School, and Lone Survivor,  it is clear that navy SEALs are very hard working dedicated professionals with some of the toughest training ever devised . Contrary to belief, the SEALs are one of the premier land warfare units in the world. The SEALs are not the same old UDTs from the 50s and 60s. Most of their training is land based and although they are still experts in the water, and view it as a safe heaven, they are moving further and further away from just being a maritime force.  In operation redwing 4 SEALs were stumbled upon by goat herders. Instead of killing them, they let the non-combatant herders go. Soon 150+  taliban fighters were attacking them, with the advantage in numbers as well as terrain, being above them on a hill in the hindu kush. The 4 SEALs killed 100+ of the enemy fighters, some of them being wounded as many as five times, but never quitting. One of them was awarded the MOH for running into the open while under heavy fire so he could call in support for his men with a cell phone. Marcus luttrell was the only survivor and he managed to evade miles while severely wounded, all the while avoiding enemy patrols. Bottom line, The SEALs train to be the best at everything they do. It is drilled into them from day 1 at indoc that it pays to be a winner, because in their line of work, 2nd place means death. Saying "SEALs can swim far but cant run as well" is stupid because its just not true. If you read a book about BUD/s or ever talk to a SEAL you will see they run and swim to the point of physical collapse, and then some. And it doesn't get easier after Hellweek. Contrary to what some people think BUD/s just gets harder and harder after hellweek. Besides, BUD/s is just a ticket to get a seat at the table to attend SQT (SEAL Qualification Training) This is another 4 months of extremely tough training. Then if you pass you go on to medic training or sdv training. Then after all this, you are assigned to a SEAL platoon. This is where the most difficult and advanced training takes place. A platoon normally trains for an additional 12-15 months and is then deployed. After all that you are still an fng.  I'm not saying the SEALs are better than anyone else, but when it comes down to it, I dont see how you can be better or more efficient than them, because what ever level the bar is raised to, the SEALs always clear it. As a side note,  Delta Force is possibly very similar to the SAS, or at least it was when it was formed. Beckwith trained with the SAS and he copied their structure to form Delta. Chances are, their structure has since changed. If you want to compare Delta Selection and training with the SAS's read Eric Haneys novel "Inside Delta Force", and then read a book describing the SAS selection and training. I would bet money that they are both VERY similar.

and just when we thought it had died a well deserved death, the 'energizer' thread just keeps on going and going.
How much would you like to bet that Delta and SAS selections are very similar? you have yourself a betting opponent, I'll wager a lot. You will not hear of all the tasks and events that occur in either of these unit's selections, thus you cannot compare with all the details.
 
As for the SEAL story from afghanistan, sounds a bit like another B20 zero story to me, did they face an entire armoured brigade aswell?
 
Quote    Reply

JFKY       1/23/2008 4:26:03 PM
Bob, Luttrell DID win the Navy Cross, that would be the Second Highest award for valour you can get in the US Navy.  So apparently SOME of the referenced "stuff" occurred.  Sorry, if that some how bursts any bubbles.  Mind you I am NOT taking any sides in this otherwise foolish argument about whose Special Operators are the best.
 
I'm just saying that a great deal of what was quoted, has some support.  There was a Medal of Honor issued for that incident and there was a Navy Cross issued.  We don't usually hand those out on a whim, so I'm going to go with 100 of the bad guys died...they may have died from air strikes, artillery, old age, influenza or the like, but they died.  The gentlemen who talked about Luttrell might have wanted you to think that the SEALS, alone, killed the Taliban, that I don't know.  I doubt that a 4 man team is going to kill 100 bad guys in a fire fight, but the numbers and the general story is probably true.  We don't hand out the No. 1 and No. 2 medal(s) for valor on a whim and a prayer.
 
Quote    Reply

KimberCustom2       1/23/2008 7:55:11 PM
"How much would you like to bet that Delta and SAS selections are very similar? you have yourself a betting opponent, I'll wager a lot. You will not hear of all the tasks and events that occur in either of these unit's selections, thus you cannot compare with all the details.
 
As for the SEAL story from afghanistan, sounds a bit like another B20 zero story to me, did they face an entire armoured brigade aswell?"
 
Well, its a fact that Charles Beckwith mirrored SAS structure and selection procedures when Delta was first made. Eric Haneys book does go into a great deal of detail in regards to the selection process and training of Delta, and if any accounts of SAS selection have been written, which im sure they have, I was simply suggesting a better way to compare the two units. Sure you wont ever know entirely what goes on but its as close as anyone can get without being at selection. As for my account of operation Redwing. the book detailing the events is advertised on this site by amazon  if you feel like looking into it. 
 
Quote    Reply

bob the brit       1/23/2008 8:45:55 PM














"How much
would you like to bet that Delta and SAS selections are very similar?
you have yourself a betting opponent, I'll wager a lot. You will not
hear of all the tasks and events that occur in either of these unit's
selections, thus you cannot compare with all the details.

 

As for the SEAL story from afghanistan, sounds a bit like another
B20 zero story to me, did they face an entire armoured brigade aswell?"

 



Well, its a fact that Charles Beckwith mirrored SAS structure and selection procedures when Delta was first made. Eric Haneys book does go into a great deal of detail in regards to the selection process and training of Delta, and if any accounts of SAS selection have been written, which im sure they have, I was simply suggesting a better way to compare the two units. Sure you wont ever know entirely what goes on but its as close as anyone can get without being at selection. As for my account of operation Redwing. the book detailing the events is advertised on this site by amazon  if you feel like looking into it. 

JFKY, I've only briefly looked into the story, and in no way do I mean to defame those present when things went awry. I'm just being a speculative old man, and I apologise. I'll readily accept your comment that it isn't clear how the 100 or so tangos bit the dust, I'm just critical when it is said a very small number of men killed a very large number of men [25 per person on averages, far exceeds my record, and I was in the biz for more than a few years]. And since such publications like B20 have come out, I'm always speculative as to the true numbers. After all, publishers/editors have a knack for adding some 'hollywood' to an otherwise true account.
As for the person commenting on Delta [sorry, I've have forgotten your handle/name], having met Charlie and the D-boys on a couple of occasions, I can tell you that Delta's structure, selection, and modus operandi were heavily if not equally influenced by other existing units [primarily US but with a bit of foreign spice as well]. I know both Delta and regiment selections quite well [or at least  used to] and their differences are easily recognisable. Now that is not to say some methods weren't carried across the pond, but they are certainly not the same, nor were they at the foundation of Delta.
Also, thankyou for the book suggestion. I shall look into it further.
 
Quote    Reply

mough       1/24/2008 1:26:51 PM
Oh good someones read a book and is now an expert....time to retire me thinks.
 
Quote    Reply

static       1/24/2008 3:34:33 PM
The thread that never dies!  Just when I though things had cooled down too.

I think the story he is referring to is from the book "Lone Survivor" by Marcus Luttrell.  I got it for Christmas and was looking forward to reading it but my pesky professors seem to have some other reading in mind for me to finish first.  Maybe this summer.  Looks interesting anyway, if you get a chance to read it Bob let me know what you think.

 
Quote    Reply

free_man 12    OK, OK I'll tell you...   1/24/2008 4:09:12 PM
 
Quote    Reply



 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics