Military History
|
How To Make War
|
Wars Around the World
Rules of Use
How to Behave on an Internet Forum
Commandos and Special Operations
Discussion Board
Return to Topic Page
Subject:
Difference between CT teams and SWAT
bravoss
1/31/2007 2:03:24 PM
whats the difference between swat teams such as for example LAPD SWAT or german SEK and counter terrorist units such as GSG-9 or FBI HOSTAGE RESCUE TEAM. i know the SWAT teams and SEK operate state wide and GSG-9 and HRT operate country wide. is there a difference in their roles,i mean there must be because if there wasnt there wouldnt be a need for both units. is it that the CT units engage high risk missions such and SWAT teams are more of a unit for arresting criminals and doing some minor risk hostage rescues ? if someone knows,please explain. and also is there a big difference between the training. i'm also a bit confused because GSG-9 is taking part in SWAT world contest and it is not the SWAT team. thank you.
Quote
Reply
Show Only Poster Name and Title
Newest to Oldest
Pages:
PREV
1
2
3
GOP
2/4/2007 1:04:42 AM
Sorry for the triple post.
Quote
Reply
smitty237
2/4/2007 10:48:31 AM
Great point. While it's very true that SWAT has more operational experience than the Tier 1 CT units, that is very misleading. Serving a warrant for two bozo drug dealers is a completely different animal than clearing a terrorist compound in Afghanistan...the municipal SWAT team would be way out of it's league there. The quality of Tier 1 CT units just can't be compared to the municipal SWAT team. They are the best combat shooters in the world, spend hours in the kill house, train in HALO and helicopter insertion, train with other top notch units, etc. While local SWAT is taking down Joe Bozo's crackhouse, SEAL Team 6 is off in the fridgid waters off of Germany training with the SBS and Kampfschwimmers taking down an Oil Platform held by "terrorists" (other tier 1 operators). And while the municipal SRT team is serving the high risk warrant against jack doofus (the wifebeating drunk), CAG is off in England training with the SAS is CQB technique. SWAT does a great job at their mission tasks, but no one expects them to be able to do what a CAG/ST6/KSK/SAS/etc can do.
I don't mean to be rude at all, by the way.
Damn, son. Not only do you dish on SWAT, but you had to do it THREE times. That's cold. In all seriousness, you reinforced the point I was trying to make, but I was mainly pointing out the difference between the missions and purpose of SWAT vs. CT. I would take issue with the "Joe Bozo crackhouse" characterization. Raids on drug houses are dangerous business, and in many cases a raid on a crackhouse in L.A. or a meth house in rural Missouri present some of the same threats as hitting a terrorist safe house in Pakistan or Colombia. An AK-47 is an AK-47, whether it is fired in Compton or Karachi. Sure, most raids end without a shot being fired, but you have to train for the worst case scenario. Let me ask you this: Which is harder, raiding a house understanding that you can only shoot the bad guy if he threatens to shoot you or someone else, or going into a house "weapons free", in which any armed or resisting subject can be shot on sight. I bet even the Delta guys would admit that the first scenario would be a tough one to operate under and would require a lot of training and discipline.
I still feel that the operational tempo point I made regarding experienced SWAT teams is an important one. You can train all day long for weeks, but most operators will tell you that the best way to learn is to do it for real. I believe that many of the top tier American SWAT units could be rather quickly trained up to a level where they could take down a terrorist held facility. The hard part would be getting them trained up in the infiltration and exfiltration tactics (parachuting, scuba diving, and land navigation, among others) used by Delta, SAS, and ST6. Were terrorists to attack a school or shopping mall in the United States it wouldn't be Delta, ST6, or even FBI HRT responding, but your local police SWAT team. The situation becomes what is called in the police world an "active shooter" situation. I've been meaning to write a post about this tactic and how it could apply to counter-terrorist situations, but have been putting it off.
Here's an interesting sidenote: Does anyone know what America's first dedicated counter terrorist unit was? It wasn't SWAT or Seal Team 6, but LAPD SWAT. SWAT was formed in the late 1960's by former LA Chief Daryl Gates to help the Department fight militant urban terrorist groups such as the Symbionese Liberation Army. Most of the early members were military veterans and used military style tactics. When Delta was formed in the mid to late 70's they consulted with civilian police SWAT units (not to mention the British SAS), who by that time had several years of experience in room clearing and CQB tactics. To this day military CT units quietly and covertly consult with and train with Federal and local police SWAT units on tactics and equipment. Their missions are different, but they can learn a lot from each other.
Quote
Reply
bravoss
2/4/2007 12:03:55 PM
But smitty wouldn't you agree that the guys that CAG or ST6 confront are usually much more dangerous than the typical SWAT target ? AK-47 is always an AK-47 but it depends on who is shooting it. No harm intended.
Any good books on CT Units. I meant on books with many units featured not one unit only books. thanks.
Quote
Reply
GOP
2/4/2007 3:13:05 PM
Great point. While it's very true that SWAT has more operational experience than the Tier 1 CT units, that is very misleading. Serving a warrant for two bozo drug dealers is a completely different animal than clearing a terrorist compound in Afghanistan...the municipal SWAT team would be way out of it's league there. The quality of Tier 1 CT units just can't be compared to the municipal SWAT team. They are the best combat shooters in the world, spend hours in the kill house, train in HALO and helicopter insertion, train with other top notch units, etc. While local SWAT is taking down Joe Bozo's crackhouse, SEAL Team 6 is off in the fridgid waters off of Germany training with the SBS and Kampfschwimmers taking down an Oil Platform held by "terrorists" (other tier 1 operators). And while the municipal SRT team is serving the high risk warrant against jack doofus (the wifebeating drunk), CAG is off in England training with the SAS is CQB technique. SWAT does a great job at their mission tasks, but no one expects them to be able to do what a CAG/ST6/KSK/SAS/etc can do.
I don't mean to be rude at all, by the way.
Damn, son. Not only do you dish on SWAT, but you had to do it THREE times. That's cold. In all seriousness, you reinforced the point I was trying to make, but I was mainly pointing out the difference between the missions and purpose of SWAT vs. CT. I would take issue with the "Joe Bozo crackhouse" characterization. Raids on drug houses are dangerous business, and in many cases a raid on a crackhouse in L.A. or a meth house in rural Missouri present some of the same threats as hitting a terrorist safe house in Pakistan or Colombia. An AK-47 is an AK-47, whether it is fired in Compton or Karachi. Sure, most raids end without a shot being fired, but you have to train for the worst case scenario. Let me ask you this: Which is harder, raiding a house understanding that you can only shoot the bad guy if he threatens to shoot you or someone else, or going into a house "weapons free", in which any armed or resisting subject can be shot on sight. I bet even the Delta guys would admit that the first scenario would be a tough one to operate under and would require a lot of training and discipline.
I still feel that the operational tempo point I made regarding experienced SWAT teams is an important one. You can train all day long for weeks, but most operators will tell you that the best way to learn is to do it for real. I believe that many of the top tier American SWAT units could be rather quickly trained up to a level where they could take down a terrorist held facility. The hard part would be getting them trained up in the infiltration and exfiltration tactics (parachuting, scuba diving, and land navigation, among others) used by Delta, SAS, and ST6. Were terrorists to attack a school or shopping mall in the United States it wouldn't be Delta, ST6, or even FBI HRT responding, but your local police SWAT team. The situation becomes what is called in the police world an "active shooter" situation. I've been meaning to write a post about this tactic and how it could apply to counter-terrorist situations, but have been putting it off.
Here's an interesting sidenote: Does anyone know what America's first dedicated counter terrorist unit was? It wasn't SWAT or Seal Team 6, but LAPD SWAT. SWAT was formed in the late 1960's by former LA Chief Daryl Gates to help the Department fight militant urban terrorist groups such as the Symbionese Liberation Army. Most of the early members were military veterans and used military style tactics. When Delta was formed in the mid to late 70's they consulted with civilian police SWAT units (not to mention the British SAS), who by that time had several years of experience in room clearing and CQB tactics. To this day military CT units quietly and covertly consult with and train with Federal and local police SWAT units on tactics and equipment. Their missions are different, but they can learn a lot from each other.
I'm wasn't intending to diss SWAT, that could be my career goals if the whole military things falls through.
I certainly didn't mean to say that taking down a crackhouse isn't dangerous business, but I honestly believe that taking down a terrorist compound is
Quote
Reply
smitty237
2/5/2007 11:50:12 PM
But smitty wouldn't you agree that the guys that CAG or ST6 confront are usually much more dangerous than the typical SWAT target ? AK-47 is always an AK-47 but it depends on who is shooting it. No harm intended.
Any good books on CT Units. I meant on books with many units featured not one unit only books. thanks.
The bad guys Delta (what does CAG stand for?) or ST6 might run into run the gambit from an untrained, uneducated teenager armed with a rusty AK-47 to a battle hardened, well-trained Islamic militant. The same goes for the SWAT cops to some extent. Most of the time you are dealing with people that will surrender quickly, but every once in a while you will be facing a hard core white supremacist, drugged out paranoid meth head, or a veteran gang banger that is not afraid to die and has nothing to lose by shooting it out with the police. Granted, the risks to CT operators are much greater when they go on actual ops, but SWAT cops carry guns and wear helmets and body armor for a reason. It isn't just for show.
One book I have in front of me right now is
Special Forces
by Lt. Col. George Forty. It is put out by Airlife publishing. They show a website of
; It provides a glossary of most of the world's special forces and CT units. It was published in 2002, so it is still pretty up to date for the most part.
Quote
Reply
smitty237
2/6/2007 12:29:01 AM
Great point. While it's very true that SWAT has more operational experience than the Tier 1 CT units, that is very misleading. Serving a warrant for two bozo drug dealers is a completely different animal than clearing a terrorist compound in Afghanistan...the municipal SWAT team would be way out of it's league there. The quality of Tier 1 CT units just can't be compared to the municipal SWAT team. They are the best combat shooters in the world, spend hours in the kill house, train in HALO and helicopter insertion, train with other top notch units, etc. While local SWAT is taking down Joe Bozo's crackhouse, SEAL Team 6 is off in the fridgid waters off of Germany training with the SBS and Kampfschwimmers taking down an Oil Platform held by "terrorists" (other tier 1 operators). And while the municipal SRT team is serving the high risk warrant against jack doofus (the wifebeating drunk), CAG is off in England training with the SAS is CQB technique. SWAT does a great job at their mission tasks, but no one expects them to be able to do what a CAG/ST6/KSK/SAS/etc can do.
I don't mean to be rude at all, by the way.
Damn, son. Not only do you dish on SWAT, but you had to do it THREE times. That's cold. In all seriousness, you reinforced the point I was trying to make, but I was mainly pointing out the difference between the missions and purpose of SWAT vs. CT. I would take issue with the "Joe Bozo crackhouse" characterization. Raids on drug houses are dangerous business, and in many cases a raid on a crackhouse in L.A. or a meth house in rural Missouri present some of the same threats as hitting a terrorist safe house in Pakistan or Colombia. An AK-47 is an AK-47, whether it is fired in Compton or Karachi. Sure, most raids end without a shot being fired, but you have to train for the worst case scenario. Let me ask you this: Which is harder, raiding a house understanding that you can only shoot the bad guy if he threatens to shoot you or someone else, or going into a house "weapons free", in which any armed or resisting subject can be shot on sight. I bet even the Delta guys would admit that the first scenario would be a tough one to operate under and would require a lot of training and discipline.
I still feel that the operational tempo point I made regarding experienced SWAT teams is an important one. You can train all day long for weeks, but most operators will tell you that the best way to learn is to do it for real. I believe that many of the top tier American SWAT units could be rather quickly trained up to a level where they could take down a terrorist held facility. The hard part would be getting them trained up in the infiltration and exfiltration tactics (parachuting, scuba diving, and land navigation, among others) used by Delta, SAS, and ST6. Were terrorists to attack a school or shopping mall in the United States it wouldn't be Delta, ST6, or even FBI HRT responding, but your local police SWAT team. The situation becomes what is called in the police world an "active shooter" situation. I've been meaning to write a post about this tactic and how it could apply to counter-terrorist situations, but have been putting it off.
Here's an interesting sidenote: Does anyone know what America's first dedicated counter terrorist unit was? It wasn't SWAT or Seal Team 6, but LAPD SWAT. SWAT was formed in the late 1960's by former LA Chief Daryl Gates to help the Department fight militant urban terrorist groups such as the Symbionese Liberation Army. Most of the early members were military veterans and used military style tactics. When Delta was formed in the mid to late 70's they consulted with civilian police SWAT units (not to mention the British SAS), who by that time had several years of experience in room clearing and CQB tactics. To this day military CT units quietly and covertly consult with and train with Federal and local police SWAT units on tactics and equipment. Their missions are different, but they can learn a lot from each other.
Quote
Reply
longrifle
2/6/2007 1:10:07 AM
"BTW: the only thing I cringe at is doing a slow, methodical search through a roach infested trailer."
Hence my preference for laying out in the bushes and watching it all go down through the scope of my Remington Light Tactical Rifle.
Entry team glory is overrated.
I've been through enough roach infested trailers in the normal course of patrol duties to ask for a spot on the entry team.
Quote
Reply
longrifle
2/6/2007 1:22:59 AM
"Sure, there are lots of terrorists hiding in houses in Iraq, but also inside a lot of those houses are a lot of women, children, and unarmed men. Going in guns blazing may do nothing more than create more terrorists, which may mean more work for the CT guys in the future."
Smitty,
Understood, and I agree up to a point; however, there is some controversy about infantry units overrelying on SWAT style entrys and CQB.
Here's a thread from the Small Wars Council: council.smallwarsjournal.com/showthread.php?t=2089
I wrote the web address without the http://, since I can never get a link to work that way.
Quote
Reply
GOP
2/6/2007 11:58:42 AM
Great point. While it's very true that SWAT has more operational experience than the Tier 1 CT units, that is very misleading. Serving a warrant for two bozo drug dealers is a completely different animal than clearing a terrorist compound in Afghanistan...the municipal SWAT team would be way out of it's league there. The quality of Tier 1 CT units just can't be compared to the municipal SWAT team. They are the best combat shooters in the world, spend hours in the kill house, train in HALO and helicopter insertion, train with other top notch units, etc. While local SWAT is taking down Joe Bozo's crackhouse, SEAL Team 6 is off in the fridgid waters off of Germany training with the SBS and Kampfschwimmers taking down an Oil Platform held by "terrorists" (other tier 1 operators). And while the municipal SRT team is serving the high risk warrant against jack doofus (the wifebeating drunk), CAG is off in England training with the SAS is CQB technique. SWAT does a great job at their mission tasks, but no one expects them to be able to do what a CAG/ST6/KSK/SAS/etc can do.
I don't mean to be rude at all, by the way.
Damn, son. Not only do you dish on SWAT, but you had to do it THREE times. That's cold. In all seriousness, you reinforced the point I was trying to make, but I was mainly pointing out the difference between the missions and purpose of SWAT vs. CT. I would take issue with the "Joe Bozo crackhouse" characterization. Raids on drug houses are dangerous business, and in many cases a raid on a crackhouse in L.A. or a meth house in rural Missouri present some of the same threats as hitting a terrorist safe house in Pakistan or Colombia. An AK-47 is an AK-47, whether it is fired in Compton or Karachi. Sure, most raids end without a shot being fired, but you have to train for the worst case scenario. Let me ask you this: Which is harder, raiding a house understanding that you can only shoot the bad guy if he threatens to shoot you or someone else, or going into a house "weapons free", in which any armed or resisting subject can be shot on sight. I bet even the Delta guys would admit that the first scenario would be a tough one to operate under and would require a lot of training and discipline.
I still feel that the operational tempo point I made regarding experienced SWAT teams is an important one. You can train all day long for weeks, but most operators will tell you that the best way to learn is to do it for real. I believe that many of the top tier American SWAT units could be rather quickly trained up to a level where they could take down a terrorist held facility. The hard part would be getting them trained up in the infiltration and exfiltration tactics (parachuting, scuba diving, and land navigation, among others) used by Delta, SAS, and ST6. Were terrorists to attack a school or shopping mall in the United States it wouldn't be Delta, ST6, or even FBI HRT responding, but your local police SWAT team. The situation becomes what is called in the police world an "active shooter" situation. I've been meaning to write a post about this tactic and how it could apply to counter-terrorist situations, but have been putting it off.
Here's an interesting sidenote: Does anyone know what America's first dedicated counter terrorist unit was? It wasn't SWAT or Seal Team 6, but LAPD SWAT. SWAT was formed in the late 1960's by former LA Chief Daryl Gates to help the Department fight militant urban terrorist groups such as the Symbionese Liberation Army. Most of the early members were military veterans and used military style tactics. When Delta was formed in the mid to late 70's they consulted with civilian police SWAT units (not to mention the British SAS), who by that time had several years of experience in r
Quote
Reply
PREV
1
2
3
Latest
News
Most
Read
Most
Commented
Hot
Topics
PHILIPPINES: The Plan To Stop China
PROCUREMENT: USMC Builds Their Backup System
MURPHY'S LAW: How Islam Breeds Defeat In The Air
SURFACE FORCES : Saar For The Rest Of Us
NIGERIA: The Hills Are Alive With The Sound Of Burning Churches
WINNING: Victory For The Bad Guys In Darfur
ATTRITION: The Destruction Of The Syrian Air Force
IRAQ: Holding Off The Holocaust
AIR DEFENSE: Patriot Gains A Longer Reach Against Missiles
PROCUREMENT: How Israeli Tech Gets To Eager Moslem Customers
MURPHY'S LAW: How The Generals Learned To Tolerate The Internet
YEMEN: Al Qaeda Scrambles To Survive
AFGHANISTAN: Taliban Divided On Making Peace
ISRAEL: Palestinians Inspired, Confused And Divided By Syria
MURPHY'S LAW: The Search For Politically Correct Weapons
COUNTER-TERRORISM: Why Syrian Rebels Have Their Own Internal Civil War
INFORMATION WARFARE: Data Mining Screws The Pirates
RUSSIA: The Red Army Gets Its Mojo Back
INFORMATION WARFARE: NetTraveler Joins Red October
WARPLANES: Yet More New Arrival Dates For The F-35
ARTILLERY: Caesar Gets Bulletproof, Just In Case
INDIA-PAKISTAN: Dark Days For The Generals
NAVAL AIR: U.S. Navy Ships Get a New UAV
INTELLIGENCE: How To Spot North Korean Spies
PROCUREMENT: Russia Battles Incompetent Shipyards
MURPHY'S LAW: The Chinese Edge Over South Asia
SYRIA: A Bloody Summer Guaranteed
SUDAN: Misery
NAVAL AIR: Russia Plays Catch Up
IRAN: The Sure Thing
Subscribe to Our RSS Feed
Attrition: The Destruction Of The Syrian Air Force
Murphy's Law: How Islam Breeds Defeat In The Air
WARS Philippines: The Plan To Stop China
Procurement: USMC Builds Their Backup System
Surface Forces: Saar For The Rest Of Us
WARS Iraq: Holding Off The Holocaust
Air Defense: Patriot Gains A Longer Reach Against Missiles
WARS Nigeria: The Hills Are Alive With The Sound Of Burning Churches
Procurement: How Israeli Tech Gets To Eager Moslem Customers
Information Warfare: Data Mining Screws The Pirates
Winning: Victory For The Bad Guys In Darfur
WARS Russia: The Red Army Gets Its Mojo Back
Murphy's Law: The Search For Politically Correct Weapons
Murphy's Law: How The Generals Learned To Tolerate The Internet
WARS Israel: Palestinians Inspired, Confused And Divided By Syria
WARS Afghanistan: Taliban Divided On Making Peace
Warplanes: Yet More New Arrival Dates For The F-35
WARS Yemen: Al Qaeda Scrambles To Survive
Counter-Terrorism: Why Syrian Rebels Have Their Own Internal Civil War
Information Warfare: NetTraveler Joins Red October
Artillery: Caesar Gets Bulletproof, Just In Case
WARS India-Pakistan: Dark Days For The Generals
Naval Air: U.S. Navy Ships Get a New UAV
Intelligence: How To Spot North Korean Spies
Procurement: Russia Battles Incompetent Shipyards
MURPHY'S LAW: How Islam Breeds Defeat In The Air
MURPHY'S LAW: The Search For Politically Correct Weapons
SYRIA: A Bloody Summer Guaranteed
IRAN: The Sure Thing
ATTRITION: The Destruction Of The Syrian Air Force
IRAQ: Holding Off The Holocaust
WARPLANES: Yet More New Arrival Dates For The F-35
RUSSIA: The Red Army Gets Its Mojo Back
COUNTER-TERRORISM: Why Syrian Rebels Have Their Own Internal Civil War
NIGERIA: The Hills Are Alive With The Sound Of Burning Churches
PROCUREMENT: How Israeli Tech Gets To Eager Moslem Customers
MURPHY'S LAW: How The Generals Learned To Tolerate The Internet
SURFACE FORCES : Saar For The Rest Of Us
WINNING: Victory For The Bad Guys In Darfur
ARTILLERY: Caesar Gets Bulletproof, Just In Case
INTELLIGENCE: Chinese Spies Slip Into India
PROCUREMENT: USMC Builds Their Backup System
PHILIPPINES: The Plan To Stop China
ISRAEL: Palestinians Inspired, Confused And Divided By Syria
AFGHANISTAN: Taliban Divided On Making Peace
Attrition: The Destruction Of The Syrian Air Force
Procurement: USMC Builds Their Backup System
Surface Forces: Saar For The Rest Of Us
Philipines: The Plan To Stop China
Murphy's Law in Action: How Islam Breeds Defeat In The Air
Leadership: Shut Up You Whore,
Nigeria: The Hills Are Alive With The Sound Of Burning Churches
Procurement: How Israeli Tech Gets To Eager Moslem Customers
Who's Winning: Victory For The Bad Guys In Darfur
Books of Interest
Gettysburg: The Last Invasion
American Gun: A History of the U.S. in Ten Firearms
The Chinese Information War: Espionage, Cyberwar, Communications Control and Related Threats to United States Interests
The Guns at Last Light: The War in Western Europe, 1944-1945 (Liberation Trilogy)
From Amazon
News
How To Make War
Wars Around The World
Austin Bay's On Point
StrategyTalk
Dirty Little Secrets
Features
Al Nofi's CIC
Prediction Market
Wargames
Measure of Respect
On War and Warfare
Videos
Photos
Jokes
Community
Military Discussion Boards
Military Jokes
Military Photos
Military Book Reviews
Military Movie Reviews
StrategyPage
Subscribe
Login
Feedback
About Us
Search
Account Manager
Advertise With Us
Search