B-2 -- 6400 miles                         F-22 -- 2000 miles

Clearly the B-2 has the advantage here.  There are a lot of places that an F-22 just cannot reach on it's own without external tanks, which negate stealth, or refueling from non-stealthy tankers close to the target.  The shorter range of the F-22 cause it to be forced to use a direct and predictable path to the target, which is how an F-117 got shot down over Yugoslavia, where as the B-2 can use indirect approaches.

B-2 -- 50,000 lb                         F-22 -- 2000 lb

Again the B-2 has the advantage here.  Actually, the advantage is even larger than it appears because the F-22 cannot carry anything bigger than a 1000 lb bomb internally, which eliminates a lot of weapons like the big bunker busters. 

B-2 radar image size of bee or mosquito      F-22 radar image size of falcon or sparrow 

Again B-2 has the advantage here.  The F-22 is designed for tactical stealth, nearly impossible to target until it is too late.  The B-2 is strategic stealth, most of the time you can only infer that it was there by examining the bomb craters.

B-2 -- what's that?                      F-22 -- the best

There is nothing else in the air that can compare to the F-22 until the F-35 is deployed.  The B-2 ddoes not do air superiority, period.

If I may add another purpose the B-2 serves:  Tying up a potential enemy?s resources. Because the B-2 exists potential enemies must dedicate resources in finding a way to counter it/defend against it. If the B-2 did not exist those resources could be dedicated toward other things like better submarines and anti-ship cruise missiles to threaten our carriers.

If your enemy did not have tanks would you be spending a lot time developing anti-tank weapons?