The Strategypage is a comprehensive summary of military news and affairs.
 News As History - November 22, 2009




New Strategy - Wargames at Discount Prices
1.Modern Air Power: War Over the Middle East
2.Commander: Napoleon at War
3.Close Combat: Watch am Rhein
4.Gallic Wars
5.Fast Action Battle: The Bulge

100+ Computer and Board games all with free shipping.
 
 
 
Military History | How To Make War | Wars Around the World Rules of Use
How to Behave on an Internet Forum
Fighters, Bombers and Recon Discussion Board
Sign In   Return to Topic Page
Subject: China's first naval fighter J-15 made its first flight last month.
SlowMan    9/19/2009 4:16:32 PM

 

 

 < link >


 

J-15 apparently made its first flight last month. J-15 is said to be a clone of Su-33 intended for Chinese carriers.


 
Quote    Reply

Email Me When A New Comment Is Made
Show Only Poster Name and Title     Sort in Reverse Order Posted

Pages: 1 2 3   NEXT
warpig       9/20/2009 4:48:14 PM

 <link >

J-15 apparently made its first flight last month. J-15 is said to be a clone of Su-33 intended for Chinese carriers.
 
 
Apparently your title is based on this part:
 
»¹Óб¨µÀ˵£¬ÉòÑôµÄ½¢ÔØ»ú½«½ÏÉÙµØÊÜËÕ»ôÒÁµÄÓ°Ïì¶ø¸ü¶àµØÊÇÒ»¿î×ÔÖ÷Éè¼ÆµÄ·É»ú£¬µ«ÔÚ9Ô·ÝÔçÆÚÔÚÖйú»¥ÁªÍøÉÏÁ÷´«ÓÐÉò·ÉÐÂÕ½»úÀàËÆSu-33µÄ˵·¨£¬»òÕß½Ð×öJ-15²¢ÔÚ8Ôµ×Ê×·É£¬µ«ÕâÎÞ·¨Ö¤Êµ£¬ÍøÂçÉÏҲûÓÐÇåÎúµÄÕÕÆ¬×ôÖ¤¡£
So it did fly... or not... well, it might of... but basically that's no more than an internet rumor... so no one really knows if it did or didn't... if it even exists yet.
 
Another misleading title, as per your usual.
 
 
Quote    Reply

Bluewings12       9/20/2009 5:00:45 PM
I get the same feeling than Warpig . Chinese sites (especialy unofficial ones) can be very misleading .
Wait and see ...
 
Cheers .
 
Quote    Reply

sentinel28a       9/20/2009 6:53:28 PM
Yeah...remember the hoax of China's "new attack helicopter," which proved to be a Photoshopped Tiger?
 
I'm also curious what good a Su-33/J-15 would be, since China doesn't have a carrier yet.  They slapped a new coat of paint on the old Varyag, but until I see shakedown trials with Su-33s doing CarQuals, I'm not putting money on it.
 
Quote    Reply

SlowMan       9/20/2009 8:01:47 PM
The article is quoting Richard Fisher as the source of original rumor.
 
 
 
Quote    Reply

SlowMan       9/20/2009 8:04:39 PM
@ sentinel28a

> I'm also curious what good a Su-33/J-15 would be, since China doesn't have a carrier yet.

The first of three ships is under construction. It is a 60,000 ton Varyag copy.

> but until I see shakedown trials with Su-33s doing CarQuals, I'm not putting money on it.

Russia refused to sell Su-33 to China citing piracy concerns.
 
 
Quote    Reply

Bluewings12       9/20/2009 9:14:35 PM
Sentinel :
""Yeah...remember the hoax of China's "new attack helicopter," which proved to be a Photoshopped Tiger?""
 
No I don 't (?) . Any picture ?
 
SlowMan :
""The first of three ships is under construction. It is a 60,000 ton Varyag copy.""
 
I know . 
What we all have to keep in mind is the abrupt fact that the Chinese Navy pilots (?) have absolutly no training at all regarding aircraft carrier operations . It is going to take them at least 10 to 15 years  to be a decent (?) opposition to any western Carrier air fleet . To be honest , I am afraid to be a bit optimistic (sarcastic, hehe) .
 
Cheers .
 
 
 
Quote    Reply

gf0012-aust       9/20/2009 9:25:25 PM

Sentinel :  ""Yeah...remember the hoax of China's "new attack helicopter," which proved to be a Photoshopped Tiger?""

 
I think you'll find that it was a South African Rooivalk.  Similar looking to a Tiger in some aspects though
They did however photoshop a Nimitz carrier in dock and pretended that it was a chinese carrier.  They even put chinese caliigraphy across the gantry...  
 
Quote    Reply

warpig       9/20/2009 9:28:51 PM

The article is quoting Richard Fisher as the source of original rumor.

Only with regard to some old post of his about the J-15 being based on the Su-33, not the part about it supposedly flying two weeks ago.  Besides, I'm not sure that citing him is particularly persuasive in any event.

 
Quote    Reply

warpig       9/20/2009 9:31:02 PM


> I'm also curious what good a Su-33/J-15 would be, since China doesn't have a carrier yet.


The first of three ships is under construction. It is a 60,000 ton Varyag copy. 
 


 
Oh really?  And the source for that information is...?  Are you going to cite another internet rumor with nothing to substantiate it?
 
 
Quote    Reply

sentinel28a       9/21/2009 1:06:23 AM
Probably Wikipedia, which is where I found it.  The PLAN is apparently putting the Varyag back into service, since she's in dry dock, but they didn't move her there until April of this year, and she's still there waiting for new engines.
 
As far as the new carriers go, China hasn't started constructing them yet, though Wiki also lists them as being planned to launch in 2015.  Entirely possible, if they start building it this year or early next.  Hard to say with the Chinese, who say a lot of things when it comes to future ships, aircraft, buildings, etc.  It could be on the level or it could be a big bluff.
 
Either way, a Varyag up against a US carrier battlegroup is a pretty ugly mismatch for the Varyag.  China is looking towards blue water operations, but they really don't need carriers to go after Taiwan.  The South China Sea is a good possibility, but again, they don't need carriers for ops against the Philippines (whose air force is built strictly for COIN) or Vietnam (whose air force could be overwhelmed by Chinese land-based air).  Australia, Malaysia, or Singapore would tear apart a Varyag-size air wing, as would Japan or South Korea if it was operating in northern waters.
 
 
Quote    Reply

SlowMan       9/21/2009 12:14:19 PM
@ sentinel28a

> The PLAN is apparently putting the Varyag back into service, since she's in dry dock, but they didn't move her there until April of this year, and she's still there waiting for new engines.

No need to refit Varyag, since China has a massive shipbuilding industry and it's far cheaper and simpler to start over from scratch than try to refit two decade old Varyag. Beside it is the first of three approved carriers.
 
> As far as the new carriers go, China hasn't started constructing them yet

Well, UPI says it will begin this year < link >, whereas Chinese papers have said construction "has begun" back in June.

> Either way, a Varyag up against a US carrier battlegroup is a pretty ugly mismatch for the Varyag.

China's Varyag copies aren't for taking on US carrier groups, it is to put pressure against India and Japan. 22DDH(the carrier pretending to be some destroyer) project is being pushed forward to meet Chinese carrier threats.

China's carrier group actually helps to stabilize the region, since Chinese sub fleet is considered far more dangerous than the carrier fleet, which is going to be money sucking black hole even for the Chinese and that money would have been better spent on building more submarines and heavy missile destroyers.
 
Quote    Reply

sentinel28a       9/21/2009 5:37:55 PM
Slow, you just contradicted yourself.  You said "there's no need for the PLAN to refit Varyag," then you go on to say that she's the first of three planned carriers.  They're going to have to refit her if she'll ever put to sea again; she was towed to China.  From all reports, the refit's already started.
 
I honestly don't see a use for these carriers.  To threaten India, they'd have to sail through the straits of Indonesia, which could be easily closed by Indian submarines (or Indonesia, which isn't exactly buddy buddy with China).  Assuming they get through, they'd have to operate in the Indian Ocean, far away from any supply base (except Pakistan), in seas and air dominated by the Indian Air Force.  The Chinese do not yet have the kind of layered defense a US battlegroup has, and the air wing of these carriers is a third the size of a US carrier.  True, all India has are two Harrier carriers with similar air wings, but land-based air could devastate a Chinese carrier operating in the Bay of Bengal. 
 
Japan is a similar situation.  To get close enough to be effective (let's say, in operations around the Ryukyus), that brings them into range of land-based air of the JASDF/JMSDF.  War with Japan likely means war with the US as well, so that puts them into a situation where those Chinese carriers would indeed be facing American ones, at a severe disadvantage.  Carriers only do well against land-based air units when the carriers themselves have enough firepower to fend them off.  The Chinese designs would not. 
 
The only use I can foresee for these carriers is as a covering force for limited landings--say, a small island like Quemoy or some of the southern Ryukyus, or operations in the South China Sea, where Vietnam's old machines would be about as effective against Chinese carriers as they were against US carriers during the war.  Either that, or it's just prestige, like battleships used to be in the day.
 
Quote    Reply

Bluewings12       9/21/2009 5:48:25 PM
""they'd have to operate in the Indian Ocean, far away from any supply base (except Pakistan)""
 
There , they would have to deal with the French Navy . A fifth of our Navy is riding the waves 24/7 over there ...
 
Cheers .
 
Quote    Reply

SlowMan       9/21/2009 9:27:32 PM
@ sentinel28a

> Slow, you just contradicted yourself.  You said "there's no need for the PLAN to refit Varyag," then you go on to say that she's the first of three planned carriers.

Not Varyag itself, but the copy of Varyag.

> I honestly don't see a use for these carriers.

Bragging rights and exertion of pressure to its neighbors.

> To threaten India, they'd have to sail through the straits of Indonesia, which could be easily closed by Indian submarines

There would be Chinese escort nuclear subs to each carrier group.

> To get close enough to be effective (let's say, in operations around the Ryukyus), that brings them into range of land-based air of the JASDF/JMSDF.

F-35Bs would operate from 22DDH.

> War with Japan likely means war with the US as well

Not necessarily for Senkaku Islands.

@ Bluewings12

> There , they would have to deal with the French Navy. A fifth of our Navy is riding the waves 24/7 over there ...

Chinese fear Americans and Japanese, but not French. I am sorry to say this, but France didn't leave too much of a strong impression to Chinese.
 
Quote    Reply

Bluewings12       9/21/2009 9:58:34 PM
SlowMan :
""Chinese fear Americans and Japanese, but not French""
 
??? How do you know who the Chinese fear or not ?
Anyway , if they don 't fear the MN , it is another bonus for us . The wake-up will be even harsher .
2 of our nuke attack subs and a couple of destroyers will stop them dead .
 
Cheers . 
 
Quote    Reply
Pages: 1 2 3   NEXT



StrategyWorld.com© 1998 - 2009StrategyWorld.com. All rights Reserved. StrategyWorld.com, StrategyPage.com, FYEO, For Your Eyes Only and Al Nofi's CIC are all trademarks of StrategyWorld.com Privacy Policy