The Strategypage is a comprehensive summary of military news and affairs.
 News As History - November 22, 2009




New Strategy - Wargames at Discount Prices
1.Modern Air Power: War Over the Middle East
2.Commander: Napoleon at War
3.Close Combat: Watch am Rhein
4.Gallic Wars
5.Fast Action Battle: The Bulge

100+ Computer and Board games all with free shipping.
 
 
 
Military History | How To Make War | Wars Around the World Rules of Use
How to Behave on an Internet Forum
Fighters, Bombers and Recon Discussion Board
Sign In   Return to Topic Page
Subject: UAE Rafale sales status update : 60 for UAE + 14~28 for Kuwait. Announcement by Dubai Airshow
SlowMan    9/29/2009 5:46:55 PM
UAE Rafale sales update < link >

- France must buyback UAE's existing fleet of 69 Mirage2000-9 fighters
- Engine thrust upgraded form 7.5 ton to 9 ton to cope with UAE's hot weather
- AESA radar, improved optronics, a new sensor for missiles
- Must carry the Meteor A2A missile
- 60 for UAE
- 14~28 possible for Kuwait
- Delivery to start in 2014
 
Quote    Reply

Email Me When A New Comment Is Made
Show Only Poster Name and Title     Sort in Reverse Order Posted

Pages: 1 2
Phaid       9/30/2009 8:46:38 AM
No news here.  This "deal" has been kicking around for over a year with no resolution, and this article doesn't really bring any new information.
 
Quote    Reply

Bluewings12       9/30/2009 7:13:01 PM
I agree with Phaid , nothing new here .
**********************
What is new is that France found a buyer for a lot of M2000-9s ;-)
 
Cheers .
 
Quote    Reply

sentinel28a       10/1/2009 1:33:38 PM
I don't see how, BW.  It sounds like France would be buying back the Mirage 2000s.  Do they already have a buyer?  Because that's the only way this makes sense.
 
I assume the Mirages would be bought back over several years on a 1-1 basis, otherwise the UAE is giving up a damn fine proven fighter for something that may or may not materialize.
 
I can see Kuwait buying Rafales, especially if they're planning on expanding their air force (which they should, with Iran literally next door).  Hawks aren't going to cut it and their F-18s aren't getting any younger.
 
Quote    Reply

Phaid       10/1/2009 2:37:02 PM
France has already ruled out buying back the 2000-9s for itself.  They already have a roadmap for their fighter force, involving Rafale purchases and limited upgrades to their existing fleet of F1s and 2000Cs, Ds, and -5s, and the 2000-9s would be a more costly option that would inevitably force them to reduce the number of Rafales purchased.  In short, it ain't gonna happen.
 
Currently the only serious potential customer for the 2000-9s is Romania, but there is no firm offer there, just an expression of interest since Romania needs new fighters and the 2000-9s are the most modern fighters they could realistically afford.

But the fact remains that this deal requires somehow selling 60-odd relatively modern fighter planes, which as anyone who has been paying attention realizes is not a quick or easy thing to do.
 
Quote    Reply

Bluewings12       10/1/2009 4:21:54 PM
Sentinel , France is indeed trying to sale the dash 9s to Romania .
Phaid ~as usual~ is rather well informed . Not much is leaking out about the deal but I think that the Romanians are up for it .
 
""Engine thrust upgraded form 7.5 ton to 9 ton to cope with UAE's hot weather""
 
This is not really part of the requirement but the UAE want the M88-3 . Rafale already demonstrated its excellent thrust under very hot condition but the UAE has money to spare and getting a more powerfull engines is never bad .
Regarding the AESA RBE2 , the radar fulfill the UAE (and India) needs as far as we know .
SAR mode which is one of the request :
 
 
 
""a new sensor for missiles""
 
This is incorrect . What they want is the latest EM sensor with the "anti towed decoy feature" which is already ordered by the French DGA . It is expensive but again they have the money for .
 
Cheers .
 
 
Quote    Reply

sentinel28a       10/1/2009 11:46:51 PM
Romania's got the money to buy 60 Mirage 2000-9s?
 
Quote    Reply

gf0012-aust       10/2/2009 1:13:11 AM

Romania's got the money to buy 60 Mirage 2000-9s?
they've been getting  the israelis to upgrade their aircraft to meet NATO compliance, they did that because they can't afford new aircraft.

they still can't afford a replacement fleet with all its inherent logistics train unless its basically gifted.

 
Quote    Reply

duplex       10/2/2009 10:29:28 AM
Buying  back the Mirage's  is  the greatest  stumbling  block to the deal .  I doubt that anybody would be willing to buy 60 old Mirages in a such competitive market.. There is no market for this...
 
Quote    Reply

gf0012-aust       10/2/2009 10:58:51 AM

Buying  back the Mirage's  is  the greatest  stumbling  block to the deal .  I doubt that anybody would be willing to buy 60 old Mirages in a such competitive market.. There is no market for this...
the only countries that would be interested are existing Mirage users - otherwise it means another logistics and through life support issue.  considering that the sustainment of a platform in its entire life can equate to some 60% (and slightly increasing every year that the platform ages) of total cost, then the beancounters will be twitching their tails when they do their 15-30 year costings.  apart from which, no one will be maintaining those platforms for another 30 years, so the efficiency numbers when doing TLS will be "ugly".

Considering the fact that the Romanians did their sums a few years back and went with system upgrades rather than new buys, then I can hardly see them buggering up their treasury coffers by injecting a new and different solution with dissimilar parts etc... into their orbat.  One thing everyone knows is not to buy systems like the Indians have done.  Its biting them on the arse.  Buying a different combat system is more than just the isssue of the general public seeing the sexy bits at airshows and service day events.  Esp in the current financial climate.

 
Quote    Reply

warpig       10/2/2009 12:09:16 PM



Buying  back the Mirage's  is  the greatest  stumbling  block to the deal .  I doubt that anybody would be willing to buy 60 old Mirages in a such competitive market.. There is no market for this...



the only countries that would be interested are existing Mirage users - otherwise it means another logistics and through life support issue.  considering that the sustainment of a platform in its entire life can equate to some 60% (and slightly increasing every year that the platform ages) of total cost, then the beancounters will be twitching their tails when they do their 15-30 year costings.  apart from which, no one will be maintaining those platforms for another 30 years, so the efficiency numbers when doing TLS will be "ugly".



Considering the fact that the Romanians did their sums a few years back and went with system upgrades rather than new buys, then I can hardly see them buggering up their treasury coffers by injecting a new and different solution with dissimilar parts etc... into their orbat.  One thing everyone knows is not to buy systems like the Indians have done.  Its biting them on the arse.  Buying a different combat system is more than just the isssue of the general public seeing the sexy bits at airshows and service day events.  Esp in the current financial climate.





 
 
Maybe France could risk the wrath of China, and convince Taiwan to buy them in order to double the number of Mirages the TAF keeps in storage.
 
 
Quote    Reply

sentinel28a       10/3/2009 2:23:00 AM

Buying  back the Mirage's  is  the greatest  stumbling  block to the deal .  I doubt that anybody would be willing to buy 60 old Mirages in a such competitive market.. There is no market for this...


The Mirage 2000-9 isn't exactly old.  It's pretty competitive.  I would even say that it's a better interceptor than the Rafales currently in service.
 
A good market would be Pakistan, which needs a replacement for its ancient Mirage III fleet...but I don't see France risking the wrath of India on that one.  Another interesting customer would be Vietnam, which needs a MiG-21 replacement.  That would be the irony of ironies!
 
 
Quote    Reply

Bluewings12       10/3/2009 12:37:23 PM
Sentinel :
""The Mirage 2000-9 isn't exactly old.  It's pretty competitive.  I would even say that it's a better interceptor than the Rafales currently in service.""
 
The -9s are not very old indeed and stay very competitive . Nevertheless while they are deadly in AtoA  , the Rafale has the edge . I know why you say such thing sentinel : the -9 's RDY-2 radar , the ICMS MkIII ECM suite , its rather low RCS (2 square meter) and its speed . The Rafale better the -9 in all those areas bare the max speed , but I agree that the ECM fight would be very close and the two fighters would probably have to go dogfight and then , the -9 is in a hell of trouble ...
 
Cheers .
 
Quote    Reply

Bluewings12       10/3/2009 12:59:48 PM
Translation of a French article published in "Le Point" magazine 3 weeks ago :
 
""The Air Force of this country (Romania) seeks to replace some old Mig 21 Soviet-made, modernized in the former Yugoslavia, and had originally planned to purchase new aircraft. It could be either French Rafale F3, or Swedish JAS 39 Gripen or F-16C / D Block 50/52 Lockheed Martin.
These ambitions have now been abandoned, and according to our information, Bucharest provides for only the purchase of 12 used aircraft, which could be either former F-16C / D Block 25 of the U.S. Air Force, currently under cocoon in the Mojave Desert or, indeed, Mirage 2000-9 redeemed by the French government in the UAE, and then resold.""
 
Cheers .
 
Quote    Reply

gf0012-aust       10/3/2009 4:53:13 PM
" .....These ambitions have now been abandoned, and according to our information, Bucharest provides for only the purchase of 12 used aircraft, which could be either former F-16C / D Block 25 of the U.S. Air Force, currently under cocoon in the Mojave Desert or, indeed, Mirage 2000-9 redeemed by the French government in the UAE, and then resold"

the last half is a politically "nice statement" deliberately crafted so as to not ruffle feathers.

as I stated,  unless gifted the on costs to support those aircraft would be an embuggerance.  France won't be interested in 12 aicraft and the inherent logistics burden unless they want to take it fair on the chin.  The economics and real life issues of injecting a totally different second hand aircraft that has less regional presence, and hence an impact on things like spare parts, cross training in type, etc would be issues that the assessment team must consider - irrespective of any political thrust.

 
Quote    Reply

Bluewings12       10/3/2009 5:25:44 PM
gf :
""France won't be interested in  (selling)12 aircraft""
 
gf , I am sorry to say but things are far more complicated than you might think .
As much as I dislike it , France could well buy back the 60 UAE -9s , sell 12 of them for cheap with a nice weapon and maintenance deal to Romania and use the rest of the -9s to : 1) replace our -5s here in Dijon , 2) slowdown the Rafale delivery to the FAF and MN to accelerate the delivery for potential buyers .

We 're many here in France to worry about such a deal . As it stands , Dassault 's Rafale line maximum production is 3 to 4 aircraft per month (around 40 aircraft/year) and at that rate , Dassault could fullfil every deals (French + abroad) and deliver on time , but Dassault doesn 't want to do so (?!) . I know this is new to you , but you have to trust me on this . 
There is some budget problem and Dassault is not sure that the French DGA will order in time the the next 60 planned Rafales . Another proof of the French cock-up regarding the calender delivery . So , Dassault doesn 't want to take any risk .
Instead , France could well use two Squadrons of -9s for 2 or 3 years before getting Rafale F3s in numbers , then the -9s could replace our old M2000 Cs and Bs for another 5 years . 
This kind of deal is very cheap for the French DGA and we sell some to Romania . Of course , it delays the next two Squadrons of Rafale F3s by 2 to 3 years . This is what I woory about .
 
Regarding the Romanian logistics , swapping Mig-21s for F-16s or -9s is the same : they will need to adapt .
 
Cheers .
 
 
 
 
 
Quote    Reply
Pages: 1 2



StrategyWorld.com© 1998 - 2009StrategyWorld.com. All rights Reserved. StrategyWorld.com, StrategyPage.com, FYEO, For Your Eyes Only and Al Nofi's CIC are all trademarks of StrategyWorld.com Privacy Policy