The Strategypage is a comprehensive summary of military news and affairs.
 News As History - December 2, 2008

Dunnigan's and Bay's Latest
Advertisement
New Strategy - Wargames at Discount Prices
1.Squad Battles: Winter War
2.Silent War
3.Manoeuvre
4.Gallic Wars
5.Fast Action Battle: The Bulge

100+ Computer and Board games all with free shipping.
 
 
 

Online Giving

Utah SEO Firm

Xango

Smiley Gifts for Babies
Military History | How To Make War | Wars Around the World Rules of Use
Korea Discussion Board
Sign In   Return to Topic Page
Subject: Necessity of tying down US forces in the area?
WinsettZ    1/17/2005 11:40:55 AM
Carl Meyer pushed a article way back when on how the ROK army was 5x size of the North Korean one (counting reservists).

That being said, is it still necessary to keep the 2ID and a bunch of marines at Okinawa nearby?
 
Quote    Reply
 Latest
 News 		  Most
 Read 		  Most
 Commented		  Hot
 Topics

Email Me When A New Comment Is Made
Show Only Poster Name and Title     Sort in Reverse Order Posted
displacedjim    RE:Necessity of tying down US forces in the area?   1/17/2005 2:49:54 PM
I certainly would not have guessed that. But even if you only count active duty, I have difficulty seeing how anyone would think the South by itself wouldn't win in a general war with the North by itself. There might be some limited scenario the North can win, but I mean a full-scale invasion with the intent to occupy--by either side. Displacedjim
 
Quote    Reply

StrategyWorld.com© 1998 - 2008StrategyWorld.com. All rights Reserved. StrategyWorld.com, StrategyPage.com, FYEO, For Your Eyes Only and Al Nofi's CIC are all trademarks of StrategyWorld.com Privacy Policy