The Strategypage is a comprehensive summary of military news and affairs.
 News As History - October 11, 2008

Advertisement


Advertisement



New Strategy - Wargames at Discount Prices
1.Squad Battles: Winter War
2.Silent War
3.Manoeuvre
4.Gallic Wars
5.Fast Action Battle: The Bulge

100+ Computer and Board games all with free shipping.
 
 
 

Online Giving

Utah SEO Firm

Xango

Smiley Gifts for Babies

Military History | How To Make War | Wars Around the World Rules of Use
United States Discussion Board
Sign In   Return to Topic Page
Subject: Anybody ever see the last part of the movie Scarface?
DarthAmerica    7/3/2008 12:38:31 AM
Well A guy in Arizona just lived it...

rightsidenews.com/200806261280/border-and-sovereignty/mexican-cartel-zetas-attack-and-kill-an-american-in-phoenix.html

...expect this to get worse or even come to your city if we don't do something about it. SOON.

-DA
 
Quote    Reply
 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics

Email Me When A New Comment Is Made
Show Only Poster Name and Title     Sort in Reverse Order Posted

ArtyEngineer       7/3/2008 2:13:35 AM

Whisky Tango Foxtrot, Over!!!!!  This happened on the 22nd.  Did this get any media attention?  Why do I not know about this?  I have been busy, but i havent been living in a box!!!!  I am quite literally lost for words!

 
Quote    Reply

Arbalest       7/3/2008 3:53:52 AM

Michelle Malkin had a couple of posts on, presumably, this event on June 26 and June 28. There might have been come coverage on HotAir; I?m not sure. Regrettably, there seems to be little coverage outside the Phoenix area.

This looks like a god argument for a severely closed border; all who cross must be photographed, fingerprinted, possess proper paperwork and be checked for wants/warrants/etc. Uncomfortably close to a police state, but better than being the guy in Phoenix. Perhaps this is a suitable reason for using 0.25" cold-rolled stainless steel 4x8 sheets as underlayment for the siding on the front of one?s house.

Since these guys were wearing full body armor, I wonder which would be the better response: an M-1A with an assortment of hunting loads or a 12-ga loaded with alternating rifled slugs and buckshot. Perhaps a large crossbow, with battery-powered cocking, . . . . . .

 
Quote    Reply

xylene       7/3/2008 1:48:43 PM
This is all Bush's fault. He intends to do nothing to secure the border and he will make sure no one else does.
 
Quote    Reply

DarthAmerica    Arbelest Reply   7/4/2008 10:27:21 AM


Michelle Malkin had a couple of posts on, presumably, this event on June 26 and June 28. There might have been come coverage on HotAir; I?m not sure. Regrettably, there seems to be little coverage outside the Phoenix area.


This looks like a god argument for a severely closed border; all who cross must be photographed, fingerprinted, possess proper paperwork and be checked for wants/warrants/etc. Uncomfortably close to a police state, but better than being the guy in Phoenix. Perhaps this is a suitable reason for using 0.25" cold-rolled stainless steel 4x8 sheets as underlayment for the siding on the front of one?s house.


Since these guys were wearing full body armor, I wonder which would be the better response: an M-1A with an assortment of hunting loads or a 12-ga loaded with alternating rifled slugs and buckshot. Perhaps a large crossbow, with battery-powered cocking, . . . . . .




Properly executed, this is a form of attack that is all but insurmountable for a private citizen. The only real choice you have is escape or hiding and that assumes the egress routes are not covered. Not much chance of escape in a well run cordon and search. Hiding is another option. If it's bad guys doing this to you then if you can remain hidden long enough for the real police to arrive you will probably make it out alive.
 
If you have to shoot, the weapons you have aren't as important as where you put the rounds. Once you start shooting they will know exactly where you are and they will converge on you probably with the benefit of covering fire, explosives and/or distraction devices and maybe even CS. You are basically screwed. You would have to hit multiple attackers probably in the dark with well placed center mass and head/groin shots while moving and while being shot at with rifles or SMGs. That kind of skill is beyond 99% of shooters. Then even if you have the skill, it's still luck to not get shot and fatally wounded yourself.
 
I attended a private course and one of the scenarios involved 7 targets and one friendly target from 1 meter to 25 meters with the students drawing from a holster firing and rushing forward through the attackers which was designed to simulate a gang mugging in an alleyway where you are blocked in. It was a really intense situation and the instructors only counted head and heart shots on an anatomically correct target. VERY DIFFICULT. The scenario was rehearsed with 200 rounds prior to the timed and graded test. In real life, most people wont have such training and there is no time to rehearse. Not good odds. Even for an experienced shooter unless you can practice all the time(2 to 3 times a week) as these kinds of skills are perishable. I think I have some of the the private training I offered which involves a lot of shooting while moving on my Youtube page but BW is too limited here for me to check right now. BUUUUT...

...Unless you are somehow involved in the drug trade or some sort of operator the chances of this happening to you are up there with getting hit by lightning.
 
I have studied this incident a bit more now and it seems to me to be an incredibly stupid way to kill someone. They could have just done surveillance on him and waited for him to leave the residence and sniped or walked up and shot him in the back of the head while sitting in the car. Instead they decided to remake the end of Scarface. Someone was sending a message...
 
 
-DA
 
Quote    Reply

CJH       7/4/2008 2:12:11 PM
This may, or may not have any bearing here, but IIRC a documentary I once saw had an interview with a Sicilian mafia assassin who referred to having replaced the shot in his shotgun rounds with cut nails in preparation for an assassination (perhaps of a government witness).
 
At first I just thought he was just trying to provide for a more extensive wound channel but then it occurred to me that he may have done this because the intended victim might be wearing a vest.
 
Any thoughts on this re the above scenario?
 
Quote    Reply

CJH       7/4/2008 2:28:00 PM
Our society values the ready availability of these drugs. Are our nation's drug users going to be detered by a few small scale invasions? I think not.
 
As long as they are going to pay what they are paying for the stuff, we can't stop every attempt to carry out attacks such as this.
 
 
 
Quote    Reply

xylene       7/4/2008 3:42:44 PM
Normally you would think hitmen would want to keep a low profile. These guys went in hard and heavy. They were even planning to ambush the police but looks like they went nuts shooting at the house and ran out of ammo. 
 
They had to have been set up locally. I can't imagine them, crossing the border in those outfits with guns or even having them in their vehicles crossing the border.
 
I agree with Darth, most people, even people trained with firearms would not have a chance in such an ambush. I just hope this is not the beginning of a new form of violence in the US Southwest. The type that has been plaguing Mexico last couple of years.
 
Quote    Reply

Arbalest    DA Response   7/4/2008 4:26:41 PM
DA,
A closer check reveals that, after following the links all the way to the original source, and reading the source, the June 26 event is the same one you listed but the June 28 event is a different one (it seemed to be presented as a follow-up article; both are home invasions, both involve Mexican nationals here illegally, etc.).
 
". . . expect this to get worse or even come to your city if we don't do something about it. SOON."
 
It seems to be worse already, and the MSM is now starting to report this fact.
 
 
I agree with your assessment of the scenario in almost every detail, subject to the usual small caveats: a sufficient weapon (no .22s, 25's, etc.), sufficient weapon training and control , etc.  From my recent experience (a continuous knocking at 3:00AM) a phone call was sufficient, and the police were happy to oblige.  But I think everyone assumes this, and has their own preferences.
 
 
The only point of disagreement I have is the initial situation, and perhaps I should have written more
 
It is to the private citizen's advantage to not let the fight get inside the house.
 
 
This scenario is quite different. It includes an armored and reinforced front door (some 4x4s, sheet-rock and moulding from Home Depot to make the interior door frame look nice and architecturally "residential").
 
Forcing the door open will take more than 2 guys and a battering ram. It might take a Bobcat; a piece of equipment apparently unused by hitmen. It also makes drive-bys pointless. Many homes already have decorative ironwork covering windows. This just leaves part of the sides and rear vulnerable, at least initially.
 
Naturally, some sort of basic alarm system needs to be installed, and common sense needs to be used: not opening the door for strangers, etc.
 
 
Quote    Reply

StrategyWorld.com© 1998 - 2008StrategyWorld.com. All rights Reserved. StrategyWorld.com, StrategyPage.com, FYEO, For Your Eyes Only and Al Nofi's CIC are all trademarks of StrategyWorld.com Privacy Policy