I well attempt here to suggest various acts or occurrences by individuals and organization as possible psychological tactics being used that could affect us all in one way or another. And I believe are worth discussing seeing how we all are here on this global battlefield trying to make the best of our lives. I have also included some personal experiences that I find relevant due to the fact they are true and may shed light on issues of peoples daily lives.
With the media and politics;
Al Jazeera news organization, on CNN the other day. CNN making so much of their openness and honesty. And they had a representative from Al Jazeera on, I waited to my disappointment to here the Al Jazeer rep ask CNN and its listeners?, why the U.S. dose not allow Al Jazeera to have a license her in the U.S. I remember the hoop and hype article years ago back in 2004 or 05 about the coming competition with the possible licensing of such media outlets for cable etc. NOT it seems.
So I say open media, wild, wild, west internet? True terrorist or bomb making sites available to all? Do the feds really need more control or do they already have ?carte blanke? now?
Politics; why lit anyone label someone Right or left wing or any other mix i.e. center right etc.
My point is that IMO if anyone was to research any one of the U.S. Senators or Congress persons serving at state or federal level, you would find the vast majority of the voting records to include both Right and left wing choices i.e.
IMO it is the lobbyist?s money thus pure corruption that is the deciding factor, not the personal beliefs of the mouth piece politicians. Furthermore I would suggest that the real important factor that the media should be reporting is that money received by those Politian?s i.e. bring out the politicians own interest, if the media really wanted to bring out the truth to the public.
I do understand these facts about lobbyist just like the voting records are out there. They are just not being force feed to the general public. So how fair of a system is that? And how can anyone say the constitution is being fallowed?
With the coverage of the Conflicts;
IMO that is the way they should be described, seeing how congress has not declared war. IMO why allow public officials to use the term war, if we are serious about political correctness. That would make sense no? Unless political correctness is just another form of filibuster.
Like the correct questions not being asked of the correct persons, and or the media allowing the questioned to fall back on Nixon?s old adage of never answering the question you were asked, answer the one you wish you were ask.
My point is the reporters only once and a great while ((IMO only now that a lot of the sheep have caught on)) well the reporters pen these politicians down on the answers.
Furthermore, IMO once again like reporters such as Tom Fredman who IMO are out there only to give the illusion that someone is looking out for all our interest i.e. to get to the truth for us. However at the same time giving possible people of interest to the government the opportunity to exposť themselves buy seconding the points made.
Why can we not see the KIA and WIA coming home. Or these brave Americans in action on the Battlefields. Like I?ve said before if the Tali ban and the like are hiding behind civilians, it should be like a true life page out of the fictional movie ?cobra?. ?you?re the disease and I?m the cure?.
Do we as a society not have the stomach for it? If so maybe we should accept that about ourselves, question our governments motives compared to our own. I well suggest it gives the military the right to claim this trauma argument we here and to use it with the KIA of the enemy too, that may not exist or be as many as the body counters that are not suppose to exist, claim.
Why no photos of the ever increasing numbers of different colored flags on the graves of all these killed in Afghanistan? Is there not any google before and after images of the grave yards sense the conflicts began etc? Do some wealthy people have this info and we average tax payers do not?
The Justice system;
I answered my jury summons today, and as I set there during the screening posies, I decided to ask the Judge a question I have been wondering about for a long time. And that was, if anyone had ever objected to the layout of the court room.
My thoughts are that it is bias towards the prosecution. Due to the fact the jury is seated on the prosecutions side. IMO a subtle or subliminal way the justice system has rigged the proceedings.
I learned recently that the French legal system is based on the defendant being presumed guilty until proven innocent. But I know here in the U.S. we as a society agree the defendant is innocent until proven guilty.
Thus a trial by your ?peers? IMO should have the defendant and his peers setting on the same si