Military History
|
How To Make War
|
Wars Around the World
Rules of Use
How to Behave on an Internet Forum
Armor
Discussion Board
Return to Topic Page
Subject:
Russian T90 vs. US M1A2 Abrams
achtpanz
6/14/2004 3:59:14 AM
Russian T90 vs American M1A2 Abrams - Which is better? If these tanks fought in battle, which would suffer more casualties, which one is superior? What are their advantages? Any information would be helpful.
Quote
Reply
Show Only Poster Name and Title
Newest to Oldest
Pages:
PREV
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
NEXT
Slim Pickinz
4/3/2011 7:23:27 PM
You've got to be the bigest dumbass posting here. Even the russians secur their vehicles from outside when they are parked. But a dumbass in stryker padlocled the door after the troops got in because they were scared of having a grenade thrown in. As far as the picture goes most countries dont put a worthless birdcage on their LAV IIIs.
Cool story bro. That's really funny since the door actually locks from the inside (just like every other armored vehicle including uparmored Humvees) so there is no need to pad lock it from the outside. Will your brain explode when you see this?
h**p://kwilson228th.tripod.com/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderpictures/m113.jpg
h**p://media.defenseindustrydaily.com/images/LAND_M113A3_Modified_in_Iraq_lg.jpg
BTW Foorgot to say thank you for the photos.
Dont know why anyone would put slant armor on a 113 when reactive armor is better.
Also if you really ever had been in the army you would be able to see that that damage appears to have been inflicted by a roadside bomb blast and not an RPG.
You can't use reactive armor in close quarters where it could injure fellow soldiers or civilians close to the M-113 if the reactive armor went off. Are you sure you're in the military?
Quote
Reply
Buzz
4/3/2011 7:23:46 PM
LOL, where do you get this info from? One, helicopters rarely engage each other. I don't believe there is a single incident where one helicopter actually shot down another. And I am telling you it is a fact stingers are not authorized on the wingtips of 64s because they mess with the aerodynamics.
So now you're saying stingers are for air to air when your last post you said apaches were using them to hit pickup trucks. Want to make up your mind?
Right before the first gulf war we integrated stinger missiles onto Apache Helicopters. Those guys go into contests to see how far they could kill an Iraqi pickup with a $50,000 missile. So yeah I believe some of them did it
Let me get this straight. You put stingers on Apaches, which aren't even authorized because they mess up the aerodynamics, in the First Gulf war. Then, the Apache pilots used the stinger, an air to air missile, to hit Iraq pickup trucks. Cool story bro.
And true. The army aviators were scared shitless of the HIND helicopters and no they didnt do anything to the aerodynamics of the airframe.
Dumbass, just because it isnt done now doesnt mean it has never been done. Go wikki it up. Unlike you some of us have actually done things in the military.
Quote
Reply
heraldabc
4/3/2011 7:26:00 PM
I don't know about Apaches, Santa,
but I do know that OH-58s practiced with Stingers against RPV training drones
and
as part of their scout mission had a capability to engage enemy helos a2a.
An Apache Longbow could easily do the same, just cue the Stinger onto the target.
As for P/U trucks, not impossible since it has a hot hood to hit, easy to see look-down contrasted against a cold backdrop (ground at night). A P/U truck-especially a Toyota is not much tougher than a helo and a Stinger would shred it easy. (500,000+ joules work in rocket when it hits you + HE warhead= ~ about 1 MJ, are you kidding me here?)
H.
Quote
Reply
Buzz
4/3/2011 7:30:33 PM
LOL, where do you get this info from? One, helicopters rarely engage each other. I don't believe there is a single incident where one helicopter actually shot down another. And I am telling you it is a fact stingers are not authorized on the wingtips of 64s because they mess with the aerodynamics.
So now you're saying stingers are for air to air when your last post you said apaches were using them to hit pickup trucks. Want to make up your mind?
Right before the first gulf war we integrated stinger missiles onto Apache Helicopters. Those guys go into contests to see how far they could kill an Iraqi pickup with a $50,000 missile. So yeah I believe some of them did it
Let me get this straight. You put stingers on Apaches, which aren't even authorized because they mess up the aerodynamics, in the First Gulf war. Then, the Apache pilots used the stinger, an air to air missile, to hit Iraq pickup trucks. Cool story bro.
And true. The army aviators were scared shitless of the HIND helicopters and no they didnt do anything to the aerodynamics of the airframe.
One of these days you might actually learn to read. A stinger will lock onto any heat source it is aimed at that is signifigantly hotter than the ambient temperature. BTW it uses more than IR. If thats all it used then we would have just stayed with the Redeye. Your not a pilot your just some dumbass soldier wanna be wikkiing up alllo of your answers. You claim to be an expert on styker and then say youre a helo pilot. Game boy is more like it. Have you ever been laid? Not talking about that blow up doll or your hand as you watch porno. Get some balls and enlist.
Quote
Reply
SantaClaws
4/3/2011 7:30:41 PM
OK, here it is from wiki.
h**p://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AIM-92_Stinger
The block I was developed in 1996, 5 years after the first Gulf War. Maybe you should have wiki'ed it first retard. So you put these stingers on Apaches in the first Gulf War 5 years before the missile was even made, huh?
Like I said, "Mr. 10 year", if I show proof of me being in the Army will you delete your account and never come back to this website?
LOL, where do you get this info from? One, helicopters rarely engage each other. I don't believe there is a single incident where one helicopter actually shot down another. And I am telling you it is a fact stingers are not authorized on the wingtips of 64s because they mess with the aerodynamics.
So now you're saying stingers are for air to air when your last post you said apaches were using them to hit pickup trucks. Want to make up your mind?
Right before the first gulf war we integrated stinger missiles onto Apache Helicopters. Those guys go into contests to see how far they could kill an Iraqi pickup with a $50,000 missile. So yeah I believe some of them did it
Let me get this straight. You put stingers on Apaches, which aren't even authorized because they mess up the aerodynamics, in the First Gulf war. Then, the Apache pilots used the stinger, an air to air missile, to hit Iraq pickup trucks. Cool story bro.
And true. The army aviators were scared shitless of the HIND helicopters and no they didnt do anything to the aerodynamics of the airframe.
Dumbass, just because it isnt done now doesnt mean it has never been done. Go wikki it up. Unlike you some of us have actually done things in the military.
Quote
Reply
Buzz
4/3/2011 7:32:26 PM
If I post proof of myself, will your delete your account and never come back to this website?
h**p://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_MOS_would_you_join_to_drive_the_Stryker_combat_vehicle
Both of you need to read that.
"Although a few different MOS's use the Stryker
vehicle
, the primary MOS to have the most chance of driving it would be
11B infantryman.
Read more:
<>" target="_blank">link
There are no tankers in Stryker Brigades. They are INFANTRY UNITS. You guys are about as clueless as Buzz. Seriously just shut up. When real Army people tell you that you are an idiot and just need to shut up, they are doing you a favor. I am doing you a favor and have been for the past 10 pages.
Go find a real soldier to post loser
Must really hurt your feelings to know everyone laughs at you. No real friends no girlfriend. Just a computer and some of your dads old sticky playboys for company.
Quote
Reply
Buzz
4/3/2011 7:35:15 PM
My whole point is that slat armor is common on all light armor and effective. Even your precious 113 uses it.
You've got to be the bigest dumbass posting here. Even the russians secur their vehicles from outside when they are parked. But a dumbass in stryker padlocled the door after the troops got in because they were scared of having a grenade thrown in. As far as the picture goes most countries dont put a worthless birdcage on their LAV IIIs.
Cool story bro. That's really funny since the door actually locks from the inside (just like every other armored vehicle including uparmored Humvees) so there is no need to pad lock it from the outside. Will your brain explode when you see this?
h**p://kwilson228th.tripod.com/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderpictures/m113.jpg
h**p://media.defenseindustrydaily.com/images/LAND_M113A3_Modified_in_Iraq_lg.jpg
BTW Foorgot to say thank you for the photos. Dont know why anyone would put slant armor on a 113 when reactive armor is better. Also if you really ever had been in the army you would be able to see that that damage appears to have been inflicted by a roadside bomb blast and not an RPG.
Dumbass if you ever had any real history behind you then you would know that the US military has always resisted employing reactive armor. In Vietnam soldier hung sandbags on the sides in hopes of mitigating RGP stikes.
Quote
Reply
SantaClaws
4/3/2011 7:37:44 PM
Must really hurt your feelings to know everyone laughs at you. No real friends no girlfriend. Just a computer and some of your dads old sticky playboys for company.
Answer me question shit bag. You equipped these missiles when they weren't even made? You travel back in time from 1996? Were you even in Kuwait? And again, if I post proof of myself will you delete your account and never come back to this forum?
Quote
Reply
Buzz
4/3/2011 7:39:12 PM
You can't use reactive armor in close quarters where it could injure fellow soldiers or civilians close to the M-113 if the reactive armor went off. Are you sure you're in the military?
Think about what you just said. If an RPG went off near you you are dead anyway making your statemment invalid. Fact is the eqyuipment is more valuable than the soldier. The soldier is easier to replace.
Quote
Reply
Buzz
4/3/2011 7:41:36 PM
OK, here it is from wiki.
h**p://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AIM-92_Stinger
The block I was developed in 1996, 5 years after the first Gulf War. Maybe you should have wiki'ed it first retard. So you put these stingers on Apaches in the first Gulf War 5 years before the missile was even made, huh?
Like I said, "Mr. 10 year", if I show proof of me being in the Army will you delete your account and never come back to this website?
LOL, where do you get this info from? One, helicopters rarely engage each other. I don't believe there is a single incident where one helicopter actually shot down another. And I am telling you it is a fact stingers are not authorized on the wingtips of 64s because they mess with the aerodynamics.
So now you're saying stingers are for air to air when your last post you said apaches were using them to hit pickup trucks. Want to make up your mind?
Right before the first gulf war we integrated stinger missiles onto Apache Helicopters. Those guys go into contests to see how far they could kill an Iraqi pickup with a $50,000 missile. So yeah I believe some of them did it
Let me get this straight. You put stingers on Apaches, w
Quote
Reply
PREV
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
NEXT
Latest
News
Most
Read
Most
Commented
Hot
Topics
WEAPONS: Unjammable Wire Controlled UAVs
RUSSIA: Russia Claims a Lot More Than Ukraine
ARMOR: Russia Rebuilds Its Tank Forces
ARTILLERY: Fire Weaver and Long Spike
ARMOR: Evolution of Tank Warfare in Ukraine
SURFACE FORCES : Ada Class Corvettes
ARMOR: Evolution of Tank Warfare in Ukraine
WEAPONS: Putting a Spike in North Korean Aggression
AIR WEAPONS: The Ukraine Unmanned Systems Force
PROCUREMENT: The Russian Smuggling Industry
AFGHANISTAN: Afghanistan March 2024
ATTRITION: Patterns of American Combat Casualties
ELECTRONIC WEAPONS: Norway Again Attacked by Russian Jamming
SURFACE FORCES : Unmanned LUSV Ships at Sea
MURPHY'S LAW: China Harasses Foreign Investment it Encouraged
PROCUREMENT: Russian Demand and North Korean Arms Production
PROCUREMENT: Russian Demand and North Korean Arms Production
WARPLANES: F22 Gets an End Date
ARTILLERY: More Truck Mounted Artillery for Ukraine
SPACE: Russian Roscosmos Retreating
INTELLIGENCE: Americans Use AI to Plan Airstrikes
SPACE: Russian Roscosmos Retreating
ARTILLERY: More Truck Mounted Artillery for Ukraine
AIR DEFENSE: Russian Air Defense Tries Something New
SUBMARINES: Stumbling Through Submarine Repairs
SPECIAL OPERATIONS: A Decade of CIA Operations in Ukraine
SURFACE FORCES : Despised LCS Survives with Upgrades
SYRIA: Syria March 2024
WARPLANES: F-35 Aircraft in Action
LEADERSHIP: Russia’s Wartime Economic Crisis
Subscribe to Our RSS Feed
Artillery: Artillery Ammunition Quality and Quantity
Surface Forces: Russian Black Sea Fleet Disappears
WARS Russia: Can Russia Continue the War After 2024?
Armor: K2 Tanks For Everyone
WARS China: China Needs South Korea More Than North Korea
Surface Forces: Naval Reload Realities
WARS Korea: Korea March 2024
Air Weapons: Dealing With FPV UAVs
Special Operations: Somali Pirates are Back
Logistics: The Black Sea Blockade
Procurement: Ukraine War Crippled Russian Arms Exports
Attrition: Russian Losses so Far in Ukraine
Procurement: French Support for Ukraine
NBC Weapons: Chinese Biowar Laboratories in California
Procurement: 3D Printers For Ukraine
Air Defense: NASAMS Under Fire
NBC WEAPONS: Chinese Biowar Laboratories in California
ATTRITION: Russian Losses so Far in Ukraine
PROCUREMENT: French Support for Ukraine
RUSSIA: Can Russia Continue the War After 2024?
ARMOR: New American M10 Tank
AIR WEAPONS: Western Russia Under Attack
ARTILLERY: Artillery Ammunition Quality and Quantity
SURFACE FORCES : Naval Reload Realities
ARMOR: K2 Tanks For Everyone
AIR WEAPONS: Dealing With FPV UAVs
AIR DEFENSE: NASAMS Under Fire
PROCUREMENT: Ukraine War Crippled Russian Arms Exports
LOGISTICS: The Black Sea Blockade
PROCUREMENT: Ukraine War Crippled Russian Arms Exports
PROCUREMENT: Ukraine War Crippled Russian Arms Exports
PROCUREMENT: Ukraine War Crippled Russian Arms Exports
PROCUREMENT: Ukraine War Crippled Russian Arms Exports
PROCUREMENT: Ukraine War Crippled Russian Arms Exports
KOREA: Korea March 2024
SPECIAL OPERATIONS: Somali Pirates are Back
Russia: Can Russia Continue the War After 2024?
Russia: Russia Claims a Lot More Than Ukraine
Procurement: French Support for Ukraine
Attrition: Russian Losses so Far in Ukraine
Artillery: Artillery Ammunition Quality and Quantity
Weapons of the World: Unjammable Wire Controlled UAVs
Surface Forces: Naval Reload Realities
Armor: New American M10 Tank
Procurement: Ukraine War Crippled Russian Arms Exports
Armor: Russia Rebuilds Its Tank Forces
Warplane Weapons: Western Russia Under Attack
News
How To Make War
Wars Around The World
Austin Bay's On Point
StrategyTalk
Dirty Little Secrets
Features
Al Nofi's CIC
Videos
Photos
Jokes
Community
Military Discussion Boards
Military Jokes
Military Photos
Military Book Reviews
StrategyPage
Account Manager
Login
Feedback
About Us
Search
Advertise With Us
Search