Military History | How To Make War | Wars Around the World Rules of Use How to Behave on an Internet Forum
Attrition Discussion Board
   Return to Topic Page
Subject: What Really Scares The Chinese
SYSOP    2/28/2013 5:54:23 AM
 
Quote    Reply

Show Only Poster Name and Title     Newest to Oldest
Pages: PREV  1 2 3 4 5   NEXT
Belisarius1234    I am aware of your CRAP...   3/5/2013 10:40:33 AM
... now.
 
Raving lunacy.
 
None of your BS, was used, except in your fevered imagination.
 
Side note on physics.
 
You asked about diamonds? Diamonds are radio-lucent. You might want to have your head x-rayed to see if it is radio-lucent as well?
 
 
B.

To many to say, and if you can not read 1 of them strategy's and say hay, then your a dip shit.

That's only some shit strategy's, there are some real good 1s and lots of them. Well let alone ways to counter weapons  & some with tec.

 THE END.
 
Quote    Reply

Belisarius1234       3/5/2013 10:25:14 PM
Imbecility is somewhat easy to prove. Look at 11.
 
 
You are crazy (treatable), you are ignorant (fixable); and you  are plainly very stupid (permanent condition, but amenable with adapatation). But worse than that, is that you are a WOFTAM (not correctable).
 
Keep repeating the insult if it makes you feel good. All I had to do, is prove that you are crazy, as originally assessed. That destroys any minimal credibility you had.
 
Done that to you.  Have a nice day. 
 
B.
 
 
Quote    Reply

Reactive       3/6/2013 5:48:55 AM
Scott.
 
1a) The GENERAL problem is that you are an idiot.
 
1b) Because you are of very limited intelligence (I'd be fascinated to see whether you clear 80 in an iq test) you are unable to see the flaws in your "ideas".
 
2) You live in a fantasy whereby YOUR ideas are real - in the REAL world you are just another raving idiot on the internet.
 
Coming back to point 1a) your liquid nitrogen armour idea is demonstrably useless, not partially, not something that "great minds" would have to look at and dismiss, but OBVIOUSLY stupid - with your limited intelligence you have the following thought process:
 
(HEAT warhead / EFP = Hot), (Liquid Nitrogen = cold) ∴ liquid nitrogen is a good choice for armour. 
 
The problem is that you are CONFUSING thermal and kinetic effects, you are STUPID enough to have a "superhero" type understanding of the relevant chemistry - the video I tried to embed (site won't allow this) was to liquid nitrogen being POURED ON HUMAN SKIN IN A CLASSROOM (( youtube.com/watch?v=zJwOTFm6DWg )) which should, even to your feeble mind explain that although it is cryogenic in temperature that does not, under all circumstances result in instantaneous heat transfer, more often than not a steam/vapour barrier will form which will (as in the above video) make it next-to-useless if your objective is simply to "cool" something. 
 
BUT ALL OF THIS MISSES THE POINT AS IT IS KINETIC AND NOT THERMAL EFFECTS THAT HEAT/EFP/KEP use to defeat armour. 
 
3) Generally, you are unable to write even rudimentary English, your level of literacy is somewhat akin to an eight-year old.
 
4) Your idiotic, rambling "insults" further reinforce the evidence already submitted, they are reminiscent of children (pre-adolescent). 
 
 
Quote    Reply

Belisarius1234    Failed mind.   3/6/2013 10:11:27 AM
The last refuge of the complete moral-less scoundrel is to claim that he did something he never intended. Thought you played me? Let me clue you in, Scott.
 
When you made the claim about diamonds, I was amused.
 
When you tried to discuss kinetics, I was amused. 
 
When you tried to get me into a gutter fight I was amused.
 
When you resorted to internet hacker-speak, but not even grammatically correct use of it, I was amused.
  
I thought I would poke you with a stick, you little worm, and see what lies I could pull out from you.
 
When you described yourself to me, I determined you to be a psychotic, with your predictable reactions. I was amused.
 
My how delusional you are.
 
Think of yourself as a napoleon? Or as a Peter Debye (Look him up.)?
 
 Liquid nitrogen on Human skin.
 
I thought you might like to see how HOT works on cold.
 
 You are not qualified to discuss this subject at all, Scott.
 
 I have some 'small knowledge' in this specific area we discuss, though I think Reactive is my superior in chemistry.
 
I like planes and missiles more, since I understand those a tad better.
 
B.
 
Quote    Reply

Belisarius1234    Failed mind. Crap, the HTML is Kaput!   3/6/2013 10:14:57 AM
 
Leidenfrost Effect.
 
B.
 
Quote    Reply

Reactive       3/6/2013 10:15:20 AM
You're a delusional idiot who has invented a fantasy where the incoherent crap you post on forums has been used by the US military. 
 
It's a fantasy, it's true only in your head, there's nothing behind it, nothing
 
R
 
Quote    Reply

Reactive       3/6/2013 11:32:05 AM
 I have some 'small knowledge' in this specific area we discuss, though I think Reactive is my superior in chemistry.
 
 
^^ I doubt that B, I know only basic principles as they would be considered by an expert : ) 
 
Quote    Reply

Reactive       3/6/2013 12:04:48 PM
Obviously post @ 10:15:20 addressed to Scott.
 
Quote    Reply

Slim Pickinz    SYSOPS   3/6/2013 6:50:15 PM
Can SYSOPS please ban this child already?
 
Quote    Reply

Reactive       3/6/2013 7:45:40 PM
And people complain about abortion.. 
 
Quote    Reply
PREV  1 2 3 4 5   NEXT



 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics