Military History | How To Make War | Wars Around the World Rules of Use How to Behave on an Internet Forum
Iran Discussion Board
   Return to Topic Page
Subject: Why can't Iran have nuclear energy ?
Ingaborg    2/24/2007 5:38:47 PM
I'm just womdering why the US, EU and the UN is so worried about Iran acquiring nuclear energy. Iran signed the NPT Iran can have nuclear under that same NPT Iran allowed UN inspectors in Iran does not have nuclear weapons Israel did not sign the NPT Israel doesn't allow UN inspectors in Israel has nuclear weapons Why this differrence ?? The ME is very instable and the best is that no country has nulcear weapons in that area.
 
Quote    Reply

Show Only Poster Name and Title     Newest to Oldest
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6   NEXT
Herc the Merc       2/24/2007 5:56:45 PM
Well the current American policy is Do as we say not do as we do. Its known as mistrust as far as Iran goes. We think Iran is reckless and dangerous.
 
Quote    Reply

swhitebull    Havent Seen a No-Nukes-For-Israel Double Standard Scandinavian in a While - NPT 101 for Dummies   2/24/2007 6:25:16 PM

I'm just womdering why the US, EU and the UN is so worried about Iran acquiring nuclear energy.

Iran signed the NPT
Iran can have nuclear under that same NPT
Iran allowed UN inspectors in
Iran does not have nuclear weapons

Israel did not sign the NPT
Israel doesn't allow UN inspectors in
Israel has nuclear weapons

Why this differrence ??
The ME is very instable and the best is that no country has nulcear weapons in that area.
Well  Ingi,  I CAN call you Ingi, cant I?   You hit the nail on the head.  Israel did NOT sign the NPT, so is not subject to its jurisdiction. You may not like that, but that's the bottom line.
That is just SOOOOOO unfair - those damn destablizing Joooooss  are at it again. The issue that comes up in regards to Israel,  and Iraq and Iran concerning “double standards,” is the nuclear issue. Iraq was invaded because it was suspected of developing nuclear weapons, Iran is under UN Article 7 Binding resolutions and subject to the conditions and terms of being a member of the IAEA, but Israel, suspected of possessing nuclear weapons, has no sanctions imposed upon it. Now why is that? Think about it.

In regard to claims of Iraq building nuclear weapons but that the Israelis secretly possesses them and should have allow inspectors, this again is a canard.

Iraq was, and is, a signatory to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation treaty, therefore obligating the Iraqis to the tenets and inspections of the IAEA. So is Iran. Israel never signed the treaty.

Since Israel is not a signatory, it is under no obligation to allow inspections, and cannot be subject to sanctions under the IAEA rules. Membership is voluntary, as is non-membership. Last I heard, it wasnt "ILLEGAL" not to belong to a club, therefore not being subject to its terms and conditions.

Israel is thought to possess a large nuclear arsenal, about which it is not being open and honest, and this is provoking to its neighbors. But it is not evidence of “double standards”. Being a nuclear-armed power is not, by itself, a breach of international law.

And we ALL know -  even you peace-loving Scandinavians - what would happen to Israel the minute she destroyed her alleged arsenal of nuclear weapons, and the alleged threat of their use, don't we? INSTANT INVASION by her neighbors, as has happened countless times. But you really know that, dont you? Seems the Middle East has been MORE stable since with the knowledge that Israel MIGHT have nukes - it lessens the likelihood of wars of annihilation against it, doesn't it?


Anything still unclear about this?


swhitebull - Life is SOOOOOOOOOOOOO  unfair at times. As Marx said,  I wouldn't want to join a club that would have me as a member.



 
Quote    Reply

PlatypusMaximus       2/24/2007 6:27:22 PM
I'm guessing that it would be a long and proven track record of lying and supporting terrorists.
 
Quote    Reply

KlubMarcus       2/24/2007 6:45:51 PM

I'm just womdering why the US, EU and the UN is so worried about Iran acquiring nuclear energy.


When the islamic regime of iran overthrows the government, seizes the US embassy by force, takes our citizens hostage, engages in combat against the US and Gulf neighbors, threatens further combat against the US and Gulf neighbors, openly supports terrorist organizations, and has proven to be untrustworthy on other matters; then of course you wouldn't trust them with nuclear energy because they are sitting on top of trillion$$$ of oil. Those concerns would still be in place wether or not Israel was around.
 
Quote    Reply

FJV    Nuclear energy is not the problem, Uranium enrichment is.   2/25/2007 5:37:49 AM
Iran is allowed nuclear energy. There are nuclear technologies that cannot be used to produce material for weapons. If Iran wanted just energy then those technologies could be used and there wouldn´t be a problem.

Instead Iran wants exactly those nuclear technologies that can also be used to make weapons. You can see this by the fact that the current stink with Iran is not so much their reactor but their enrichment of uranium. The issue is not so much nuclear energy, but uranium enrichment.




 
Quote    Reply

Ingaborg       2/25/2007 12:32:24 PM
Well  Ingi,  I CAN call you Ingi, cant I?  
 
You can call me whatever you want, what can I do about it ?
 
You hit the nail on the head.  Israel did NOT sign the NPT, so is not subject to its jurisdiction. You may not like that, but that's the bottom line.
 
I never said that I don't like it, I just wonder and think that no country should have nukes in that area,
preferably  no country at all

That is just SOOOOOO unfair - those damn destablizing Joooooss  are at it again.

Are you saying that I'm against Jews ?
I just ask a question, but whatever, you like to play the " race " card; that says more about you than me. 

The issue that comes up in regards to Israel,  and Iraq and Iran concerning “double standards,” is the nuclear issue. Iraq was invaded because it was suspected of developing nuclear weapons, Iran is under UN Article 7 Binding resolutions and subject to the conditions and terms of being a member of the IAEA, but Israel, suspected of possessing nuclear weapons, has no sanctions imposed upon it. Now why is that? Think about it.

But under the same NPT, Iran can have peaceful nuclear energy, isn't it ??

Iraq was, and is, a signatory to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation treaty, therefore obligating the Iraqis to the tenets and inspections of the IAEA. So is Iran. Israel never signed the treaty.

Can Iran retreat from the NPT at will ?
Can any country withdraw from the treaty ?

Since Israel is not a signatory, it is under no obligation to allow inspections, and cannot be subject to sanctions under the IAEA rules. Membership is voluntary, as is non-membership. Last I heard, it wasnt "ILLEGAL" not to belong to a club, therefore not being subject to its terms and conditions.

ok

Israel is thought to possess a large nuclear arsenal, about which it is not being open and honest, and this is provoking to its neighbors. But it is not evidence of “double standards”. Being a nuclear-armed power is not, by itself, a breach of international law.

Then every country can withdraw from NPT an become nuclear power ?

And we ALL know -  even you peace-loving Scandinavians - what would happen to Israel the minute she destroyed her alleged arsenal of nuclear weapons, and the alleged threat of their use, don't we? INSTANT INVASION by her neighbors, as has happened countless times. But you really know that, dont you? Seems the Middle East has been MORE stable since with the knowledge that Israel MIGHT have nukes - it lessens the likelihood of wars of annihilation against it, doesn't it?

Why do you think that I'm from Scandinavia ?
Play the name card this time ??
Never heard that over 10 million Americans trace their heritage back to Scandinavia ?
Or are only Anglo Saxons real " Americans "
Israel is a very powerful country and can defeat its neighbors without having nukes.
They have won all wars and never used nukes, so why have them ?


Anything still unclear about this?

no, thank you for your time

 
Quote    Reply

Ingaborg       2/25/2007 12:35:49 PM
Why the heck can't you edit posts here ??
In my previous post I forgot to put the text below in blue:
 
 

Then every country can withdraw from NPT an become nuclear power ?

Can Iran retreat from the NPT at will ?
Can any country withdraw from the treaty ?

But under the same NPT, Iran can have peaceful nuclear energy, isn't it ??

Are you saying that I'm against Jews ?
I just ask a question, but whatever, you like to play the " race " card; that says more about you than me. 

 
Quote    Reply

Ingaborg       2/25/2007 12:43:06 PM

Iran is allowed nuclear energy. There are nuclear technologies that cannot be used to produce material for weapons. If Iran wanted just energy then those technologies could be used and there wouldn´t be a problem.

Instead Iran wants exactly those nuclear technologies that can also be used to make weapons. You can see this by the fact that the current stink with Iran is not so much their reactor but their enrichment of uranium. The issue is not so much nuclear energy, but uranium enrichment.





I thought that Russia offered to take care of the nuclear waste that would be produced from Iran's nuclear powerplants.
The feeling I have that we may be wrong again, like we were wrong on Iraq. I don't want another war, just don't like war like some others here probably. Thank you for your answer.

 
Quote    Reply

00_Chem_AJB       2/25/2007 12:57:51 PM
The deal with Russia was that Russia provided the nuclear fuel and took ccare of the waste, Iran said no thank you we want to produce our own fuel. Oh and Iran are now claiming they put something in orbit.
 
Quote    Reply

00_Chem_AJB       2/25/2007 12:58:59 PM
 
Quote    Reply
1 2 3 4 5 6   NEXT



 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics