Military History | How To Make War | Wars Around the World Rules of Use How to Behave on an Internet Forum
Iran Discussion Board
   Return to Topic Page
Subject: Iranian End Game.
HYPOCENTER    9/25/2007 1:46:41 PM
What is the Iranian End Game? Iran must know by now, given Israel’s recent strike on Syria and with even France changing its position -- that an attack on their country (and hence the leadership itself) is very likely. The only unknown is if the attack will be limited to just nuclear installations, or expand to comprehensively destroy military/air/navy, and even the leadership itself. The way I see it, Iranian thinking must… -Want to be attacked for what it sees as a geopolitically and domestically beneficial reason. i.e. an attack by western powers = scapegoat for current leadership with regards to the poor financial state of the country & the leaderships power is solidified for decades to come. It then has all the cache it needs to attack other Arab nations & Israel; or.... -Believe with near certainty western powers will not risk an attack, or can at the very least defend itself sufficiently, thus the leadership wins/wins. i.e. all their bluster proves correct ; they “scared away the USA” & Islamic radicals everywhere are emboldened. Country gets nuclear weapons and sets itself up as the regions dominant player. Current leadership’s power is solidified for many decades to come. In both scenarios, the leadership wins UNLESS the leadership itself is targeted and attacked and partially dismantled, because that would mean it’s severely weakened and is at its most vulnerable to be overthrown from within. *NOTE: All of the above assumes any strike on Iran will involve only sea/air with maybe some commando units for recon/targeting etc. But NO troops.
 
Quote    Reply

Show Only Poster Name and Title     Newest to Oldest
swhitebull    Hillary - Factor   9/25/2007 2:06:55 PM
Does anyone think that should Hillary Clinton get elected that she might prove to be a bigger threat to Iran than any other conceivable President? She could be Iran's greatest nightmare.
 
1) First, the irony of a hated "woman" now as POTUS - such an affront to the Iranians
 
2) To prove her "cojones" at hoe with the military and with moderate Republicans - she might have to out-Thatcher Margeret Thatcher. AND, she just might be able to pull it off.
 
3) To make up for the Democrats being soft on Islamic terror and state-sponsored terrorism.
 
4) Women's rights champions (except when it comes to her own personal situation with Bill- we dont talk about that though). A thumb right in ahmadnutjob's little beady eyes.
 
5) She DOES get it. At a recent debate, she DID use the term "Islamic-Fascists"
 
6) President Bush is also quietly counseling her on what she faces in the world should she be elected
 
7) The scoffed-at "axis of evil" has recently been shown to be just that - thank the Israelis again for acting on it, sending a message to Iran that they can strike anywhere (with US approval), and exposed the NK/Syria link. Hillary understands that.
 
 
 
swhitebull -  anyone else care to add or detract from this hypothetical?
 
 
 
 
 
Quote    Reply

Herald1234    More Indira Ghandi than Maggi Thatcher   9/25/2007 2:10:57 PM
Heaven help Iran if THAT is the case.
 
Herald
 
Quote    Reply

Barca       11/13/2007 10:28:13 AM

-Believe with near certainty western powers will not risk an attack, or can at the very least defend itself sufficiently, thus the leadership wins/wins. i.e. all their bluster proves correct ; they ?scared away the USA? & Islamic radicals everywhere are emboldened. Country gets nuclear weapons and sets itself up as the regions dominant player. Current leadership?s power is solidified for many decades to come.

How can they lose?  They have Allah on their side and having nuclear weapons will bring forth the twelve Iman.  The Moslem world just needs someone who is a true believer who stands up to the Great Satan and Little Satan.  The others were not strong in their belief.  They have already shown that they can defeat Israel and force them to retreat.  The moslem world will follow Iran when they obliterate Israel. 
 
Ayatolah ?????  will be proclaimed the twelve Iman!  The infidels will bow down before All?h, who gives us victory.  Pornography has made the West weak.  They are no longer People of the Book.  Iran doesn't have a homosexual problem.  They know how to handle women and can end the Hollywood problem.  They are committed and strong in their belief!
 
Quote    Reply

displacedjim       11/13/2007 11:58:53 AM


-Believe with near certainty western powers will not risk an attack, or can at the very least defend itself sufficiently, thus the leadership wins/wins. i.e. all their bluster proves correct ; they ?scared away the USA? & Islamic radicals everywhere are emboldened. Country gets nuclear weapons and sets itself up as the regions dominant player. Current leadership?s power is solidified for many decades to come.


How can they lose?  They have Allah on their side and having nuclear weapons will bring forth the twelve Iman.  The Moslem world just needs someone who is a true believer who stands up to the Great Satan and Little Satan.  The others were not strong in their belief.  They have already shown that they can defeat Israel and force them to retreat.  The moslem world will follow Iran when they obliterate Israel. 

 

Ayatolah ?????  will be proclaimed the twelve Iman!  The infidels will bow down before All?h, who gives us victory.  Pornography has made the West weak.  They are no longer People of the Book.  Iran doesn't have a homosexual problem.  They know how to handle women and can end the Hollywood problem.  They are committed and strong in their belief!


 

Thank you for your input, Tehran Tom.  ;-)

 
Quote    Reply

PowerPointRanger    Hillary no "Iron Lady"   11/13/2007 5:57:09 PM
I think you give HRC too much credit for having a backbone--something she has yet to demonstrate (like her husband).  I think the most we could expect from a President HRC would be a nice, safe cruise missile strike.
 
Iran has shown that they will respond to a credible threat of force.  A better solution would be to turn the screws a bit:
 
Begin overt  recon flights over Iranian territory.  This will not only make them think that the attack is coming soon, but it will also demonstrate their air defenses can't stop us.  We did something similar to Nicaragua when they were still a commie puppet state.  A low-level supersonic overflight by an SR-71.
 
 
Quote    Reply



 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics