Military History | How To Make War | Wars Around the World Rules of Use How to Behave on an Internet Forum
Iran Discussion Board
   Return to Topic Page
Subject: Why did the Iraq war start?
D Man    1/9/2004 11:27:51 AM
How did it start(i need to know for a report)?
 
Quote    Reply

Show Only Poster Name and Title     Newest to Oldest
Pages: PREV  1 2 3 4   NEXT
warhead    Wow! This is the shortest thread here!   4/10/2005 7:13:44 PM
Why? Because Americans know they're in Iraq because they want to steal the oil and they don't want to be reminded of how much of failure their evil plot has been. SO they avoid such question like it was Ebola.
 
Quote    Reply

P3RSIAN    saddam   4/10/2005 8:14:08 PM
Cia knew saddam was a wild dog that hated persians so they just let him out of his cage! but now US and Iraqis are killing each other so the tables have turned in favor of IRanians!
 
Quote    Reply

Mike From Brielle    RE:Mike From Brielle Pwnd P3RSIAN & Serbia odd ???????   4/11/2005 1:51:18 PM
1.) this is a wierd thread.

2.) The USA did not sell Chemical (or any) Weapons to SADAM. A US agency did by mistake send anthrax (a biological weapon) to Iraq under the auspicies of a UN agricultural program. The chemical factories (dual use factories I believe) that Sadam got were from France and Germany.

3.) The USA would have been justified in selling weapons to Sadam in that the Iranians had attacked soveriegn US Territory (the Embasy). However the US knew what a SOB Sadam was and instead tried to arrange for you both to loose the War, which is very nearly what happened. This is not to say we instigated the war because it was impossible to get Sadam to do anmything rational only things that appealed to his thugish nature.

 
Quote    Reply

P3RSIAN    RE:Mike From Brielle Pwnd P3RSIAN & Serbia odd ???????   4/12/2005 12:52:41 AM
1. US GAVE 90% of stuff for chemical weopons to Iraq! the other 2 countries jsut gave few ingredients. It 2 avuious. USA WANTED REVENGE! 2. IF u think usa is justifeid to do taht then i dont no how many countries are abligated to nuke usa 20 times over! USA crews over so many countries! LOL and there obligated to have Innocent civilians and children die?
 
Quote    Reply

Mike From Brielle    RE:Mike From Brielle Pwnd P3RSIAN & Serbia odd ???????   4/13/2005 4:38:17 PM
It was against US Law to trade with Sadam any military related item. That is why it was such a big stink when it was found out that certain parts of the government were trading weapons for hostages. Reagan very nearly could have been impeached for that if it had ever been proven that he knew anything about it!
 
Quote    Reply

Mike From Brielle    RE:Mike From Brielle Pwnd P3RSIAN & Serbia odd ???????   4/13/2005 4:44:38 PM
And by the way, "US GAVE 90% of stuff for chemical weopon" not true at all! Why would we have made such a stink after Halubja (SP?) if we were the ones who supplied the chemicals in the first place, all the evidence would have led back to us! We may be crazy but were not stupid (well at least not most of the time).
 
Quote    Reply

1502HOGO    RE:Mike From Brielle   4/13/2005 7:28:41 PM
Halubja was not the first time/place where Saddam had used its chemical weapons so I wonder where were the “not-stupid” Americans when Saddam was bombarding Iranian people with chemical weapons? ( DON’T WORRY !!! I WILL TELL YOU WHERE THEY WERE. JUST KEEP READING ) I wonder how the “not-stupid” Americans could give such big quantities of anthrax to a regime that until the first years of 80s was considered a terrorist regime? Ohhhhhh !!! I forgot, it was as you say BY MISTAKE. I also have sth very special for you MIKYYYYYYYY (which answers my first question): http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/rumsfeld-saddam.jpg
 
Quote    Reply

1502HOGO    RE: Mike From Brielle   4/13/2005 7:36:31 PM
HAVE ANYTHING TO SAY ???
 
Quote    Reply

1502HOGO    RE: Mike From Brielle   4/13/2005 7:48:52 PM
Another "not-stupid" American who is actually a senator: SANATOR RICHARD SHELBY Senator Richard Shelby (R-AL), supporting the Iraq war resolution in October, 2002: "I support this resolution because the threat posed by the brutal dictatorship of Saddam Hussein is real, immediate, and growing. The threat is real because Saddam possesses conventional, chemical and biological weapons. He is doing everything in his power to acquire the means to construct and field nuclear weapons. The threat is real because Saddam has used his conventional and chemical weapons to attack his neighbors and his own people." So tell me, Senator, why were you holding hands with Saddam just three months after his chemical attack on Halabja? http://www-personal.umich.edu/~bgoodsel/post911/shelbysaddamsm.jpg
 
Quote    Reply

1502HOGO    RE: Mike From Brielle   4/13/2005 7:57:09 PM
 
Quote    Reply
PREV  1 2 3 4   NEXT



 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics