Military History | How To Make War | Wars Around the World Rules of Use How to Behave on an Internet Forum
Syria Discussion Board
   Return to Topic Page
Subject: An interview with Bashaar Assad
swhitebull    10/6/2003 4:00:14 AM
This is from Memri, an interview with Assad from 9/30/03: Special Dispatch - Syria October 5, 2003 No. 584 To view this Special Dispatch in HTML format, please visit: http://www.memri.org/bin/opener_latest.cgi?ID=SD58403 Syrian President Bashar Al-Assad: 'Terrorism is a State of Mind' Syrian president Bashar Al-Assad, in an interview on September 30, 2003 with the Italian daily newspaper Il Corriere della Sera, discussed his country's role in Iraq, its complex relationship with the U.S., the 'road map,' weapons of mass destruction, and human rights in Syria. The following are excerpts from the interview which was conducted by Antonio Ferrari: (1) Question: "The U.S.A. keeps accusing you of destabilizing Iraq, of sending fighters, of hiding weapons of mass destruction. The list of allegations is becoming long and dangerous. Do you not fear that your country will become the target of the next war?" Al-Assad: "I do not think that the U.S. has an interest in repeating the errors committed in Iraq. Apart from the accusations [of some in the U.S., not of the entire U.S. administration], we had no tangible signals of a military threat. Worried? Yes, we are. Not by the threats but by the results of the war in Iraq which had serious repercussions in the political, economic, social, and security spheres. Furthermore, the accusations against Syria began before the conflict. You see, our relationship with the U.S. has several dimensions: positive, as in fighting terrorism together; problematic, when we talk of Palestinian organizations or how to reach peace." Question: "The U.S. also accuses you of producing prohibited weapons." Al-Assad: "Immediately after the war, they began to talk about weapons of mass destruction in Syria. The answer is in the UN Security Council where a draft resolution to free the entire Middle East from prohibited weapons is pending. Our detractors are angry with us; they accuse us of possessing these weapons. But they were even angrier when we proposed, months before the war, to eliminate them from the whole region. What then do they want? We say: faced with an international written commitment, Syria would be extremely swift to make this effort a success. But the obligation must apply to all, without exception." Question: "If you were meeting President Bush, what would you say to convince him that the allegations against Syria are false?" Al-Assad: "He should explain to me why these allegations are true. I would then ask him where the weapons of mass destruction are in Iraq, because at this point it is clear that they do not exist. Even in the States there are institutions that openly doubt it. Then I would ask him where the democracy was that he had promised Iraq, and where the better living conditions are that were pledged. Many Iraqis, beginning with Saddam's opponents, tell us that the situation today is far worse than under the former regime. So, it is the U.S. and not us that have to answer to precise allegations. Furthermore, no country, under any pretext, would get involved in another war in the region." Question: "Despite American allegations, you express the desire to contribute to the reconstruction of Iraq. What would you answer if you were asked to send a military contingent?" Al-Assad: "We must make a distinction between sending troops and participating in the reconstruction. And then differentiate between reconstruction and the restoration of Iraqi sovereignty. Some talk about the reconstruction of Iraq as if it were a free zone for investment projects. The first role that Syria could have is to help re-establish Iraq's independence. But our involvement should be in response to the desires and will of the Iraqi people. If that was the case, we are ready. With any means." Question: "Including the dispatch of a military contingent?" Al-Assad: "Everything." Question: "Would you... participate under U.S. command?" Al-Assad: "It would mean that the Iraqi people accept the role of the U.S. Today, on the contrary, we see the refusal. It is obvious that we cannot participate under the American occupation, less so by sending soldiers. We would otherwise be considered, as the U.S., troops of occupation and therefore be rejected. Iraq needs a fixed date for the end of the occupation. Or else, the Iraqis say they will continue their resistance." Question: "Moving on to the road map, did you ever believe in it?" Al-Assad: "If the road map is not accepted by the people, by the powers that can bring peace to the region, it has no value... I ask myself why Palestinians and Israelis did not believe in it. I asked a European diplomat: What is the road map? A cease-fire or a peace process? He told me it is a peace process. No, I replied, it's little more than a cease-fire and a lot less than a peace process. The problem therefore is that the road map was presented as a container of an ultimate solution, but [as it did not] inclu
 
Quote    Reply

Show Only Poster Name and Title     Newest to Oldest



 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics