Military History | How To Make War | Wars Around the World Rules of Use How to Behave on an Internet Forum
Denmark Discussion Board
   Return to Topic Page
Subject: Interrogation officer guilty in torture case
TheArmchairCmd    1/13/2006 12:30:03 AM
Interrogation officer guilty in torture case By The Copenhagen Post A Copenhagen court has found Annemette Hommel and four other soldiers guilty of mishandling Iraqi prisoners Former army interrogation officer Annemette Hommel and four military police officers were found guilty of mishandling Iraqi prisoners by a Copenhagen Court on Thursday. Due to mitigating circumstances, however, none is facing jail time. Hommel and the MPs were charged with mistreating Iraqi prisoners in March, April, and June 2004 during questioning at the Danish military camp in Basra. The five were convicted of aggravated dereliction of duty in the case. The court, however, found that the military had not adequately prepared Hommel for duty in Iraq, and therefore decided not to issue prison sentences. Hommel was found guilty of forcing detained Iraqis to sit in stressful positions during questioning, as well as for requiring that guards hold them in position if they tried to move. She was also found guilty of using degrading terms such as 'dog', 'dog , and 'penis' to refer to the detainees. The court found Hommel innocent of ordering MPs to force detainees to sit in stressful positions while they waited to be questioned. She was also acquitted of ordering MPs not to allow detainees to drink water. Hommel immediately appealed the guilty verdict to the Supreme Court. 'I am pleased and satisfied that I was acquitted on some points. I feel that the court has laid down an unnecessarily hard line on the other points. I can't live with that,' Hommel said after the trial, adding that she had been convicted of something that was against her principles.
http://www.jp.dk/english_news/artikel:aid=3491746/ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ This is a surreal case. I didn't know if it should be put in some humour category... They were basically following the Brit rules, as the Danish hadn't been established yet.
 
Quote    Reply

Show Only Poster Name and Title     Newest to Oldest
TheArmchairCmd    RE:Interrogation officer guilty in torture case   1/13/2006 12:46:00 AM
I see that the naughty words filter is alive and well. :)
 
Quote    Reply

Schackleford    RE:Interrogation officer guilty in torture case   1/13/2006 4:37:14 AM
We really don't know anything about this case. For starters: Who were the people supposedly tortured? Were they terrorists or simple criminals without a political agenda? Or something else entirely? Besides, what is all this "torture" really? Putting a person in an uncomfortable position? Denying him a glas of water? I would think torture would be something a lot more serious such as beating a suspect into a bloody mess, cutting of a couple of fingers, or burning him.
 
Quote    Reply

TheArmchairCmd    RE:Interrogation officer guilty in torture case   1/13/2006 8:10:19 PM
We really don't know anything about this case. For starters: Who were the people supposedly tortured? Were they terrorists or simple criminals without a political agenda? Or something else entirely? IIRC insurgents getting caught trying to ambush a patrol. Besides, what is all this "torture" really? Putting a person in an uncomfortable position? Denying him a glas of water? I would think torture would be something a lot more serious such as beating a suspect into a bloody mess, cutting of a couple of fingers, or burning him. I think great care should be taken in these definitions. However, for the record, they were only denied water during the questioning itself and that after having used requests for water - and getting water - to disrupt the questioning. Also, none of it is outside any rules of interrogation set by coalition partners and can possibly only be condemned by the strictest interpretation of the Geneva conventions. It's pure politics.
 
Quote    Reply

Thomas3    RE:Interrogation officer guilty in torture case   1/13/2006 8:30:47 PM
Problem is they use military interrogation and Geneva convention which only apply in case of nations at war, not police work.
 
Quote    Reply



 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics