Military History | How To Make War | Wars Around the World Rules of Use How to Behave on an Internet Forum
Submarines Discussion Board
   Return to Topic Page
Subject: Real maximum submarine speeds.
Dominicus    12/14/2005 2:10:22 AM
First off before I get grilled, I'm going on what my dad told me(16 year submariner). He says that the sturgeon class boats(the ones that preceded the Los Angeles class boats) had a top speed of about 30-35knots depending on the boat(he says his was a pokey boat and could only peak at about 32). He also served on Ohio class boats and said they could go about 30. It was also interesting to hear him describe the differences in how those to boats handle. He basically described the Bergall(which was a sturgeon class boat) as handling like a fighter. It banked VERY sharply when it turned, and often was able to outmanuver just about anything. The ohio class on the other hand handled like a beached whale in comparison, while nimble for a boat of it's size, it couldn't manuever for crap compared to a smaller attack boat. His best guesses on the true max speeds of other boats are as follows. Los Angeles Class - Approximately 35-40 knots depending on the boat(some are just considerably faster then others). Seawolf- 40-45 knots. He knows from talking to his sub friends that the seawolf is the race car of ocean going vessels. Virginia- 35-40 knots. He figures that they probably toned this boat down a bit to keep the costs down, since in 99% of circumstances subs are creeping around and not trying to get from A to B in the absolute fastest times. So he figured that the propulsion system would probably not be as powerful as seawolf and hence would likely result in a somewhat slower vehicle(but not slow by anymeans). I'm curious what gf0012 has to say on this. I know he has a lot of knowledge about diesel boats and it would be interesting to find out how an electric behaves underwater(speed wise and how long it can be sustained).
 
Quote    Reply

Show Only Poster Name and Title     Newest to Oldest
Pages: 1 2 3   NEXT
gf0012-aust    RE:Real maximum submarine speeds.   12/14/2005 2:37:43 AM
I'm kind of surprised that your dad has gone into specifics... submariners tend to be anally retentive about getting into specifics. as for diesels, speed is not a critical part of their skillset as their mission profile usually requires more of a lurking role, "sprint" and drift etc.... . speed and range is a fundamental argument between nukes and conventionals. eg the RN got a nuke on station in less than a quarter of the time that it took for their conventionals to arrive (during the falklands) The Collins are "abnormal"examples for a conventional as they were designed for different missions. eg USN fleet support, long range and the atypical ISR role. They're designed for 70+ day missions in a wartime footing. The smaller the sub, typically the shorter the time off station. (AIP issues aside) the mission profile more or less determines the platform requirement.
 
Quote    Reply

Dominicus    RE:Real maximum submarine speeds.   12/14/2005 3:24:59 AM
Well, the reason he doesn't mind talking about information like this, is that it in many cases is already public record. The other aspect is that a subs top speed isn't so important to how effective it is in combat(although it does make them about 10x more flexible since they can be rapidly deployed anywhere). The bigger issue is stealth and my dad has no knowledge of that stuff anyway. It's really interesting when you hear about some of the stuff that went on that no one really talks about. For example there have been a few collisions underwater between US and Russian boats. Usually it was simply said that they "hit a whale". Other stories were just wierd like how one time they ran out of salt(because of a clerical error) and ended up scraping salt off of the de-salination machines that make the fresh water for the boat. Of course the drawback was it had all sorts of little critters that they ended up having to eat. Check out bergall.org and you can read about some of the goofy crap that used to happen, like "santa nuke".
 
Quote    Reply

Francois    RE:Real maximum submarine speeds.   12/14/2005 3:31:35 AM
Well, every information related to the limits (min and max) of any military asset is classified. For obvious reasons. After that, the specs defined by end user give the envelop.
 
Quote    Reply

Fast&Deep    RE:Real maximum submarine speeds.   12/15/2005 2:03:46 AM
I get the impression that The Cold War was only ever fought between the US and the USSR. When the records get declassified (if ever) then quite a few people will sit up and suddenly remember the Brits were doing their fair share as well. I mean it's easy peasy doing an underwater look on a Typhoon when he's on trials and work up - the hard part comes in detecting and staying with him when he's ice picked on QRA. But the Brits never did anything like that surely - of course not.....'cos Tom Clancy - that imaginative writer of FICTION - never got wind of it.
 
Quote    Reply

Weasel    Tom   12/15/2005 7:33:35 AM
Is that the same Tom Clancy who had an Air National Guard A10 attack a Soviet fleet in the Atlantic, drop some red flares and then fly home safe and sound? Is he still even writing books? You know, maybe the next potus runner should change his name to "Jack Ryan". I bet you he would make a good show of it.
 
Quote    Reply

southern cross    RE:Tom   12/15/2005 8:33:30 AM
>>>Is that the same Tom Clancy who had an Air National Guard A10 attack a Soviet fleet in the Atlantic, drop some red flares and then fly home safe and sound?<<< Which book was that in? It sounds like some good comic relief.
 
Quote    Reply

Yimmy    RE:Tom   12/15/2005 8:51:45 AM
The closest to that which I read from Tom Clancy was when two Republic of China F16's sank a Chinese Sovremeny class destroyer by dropping a 500 pound bomb on it, with both aircraft getting away just fine. No mention of the SA-17's, nor of the four 5.1 inch guns, nor of the four 30mm CIWS's.....
 
Quote    Reply

ArtyEngineer    RE:Tom   12/15/2005 9:13:42 AM
Pretty sure it was "Hunt for Red October" the A10 dropping flares on the soviet fleet.
 
Quote    Reply

Weasel    RE:Tom   12/15/2005 9:42:03 AM
"... Pretty sure it was "Hunt for Red October" the A10 dropping flares on the soviet fleet. .." bingo, that was the name of it.... I was in an airport lounge reading it between flights and nearly vomited several times reading that book... but i made it through.. its similar to the "ice berge right ahead" scene in "Titanic" where they order hard a port and the helmsman promptly goes hard a starboard...
 
Quote    Reply

ArtyEngineer    RE:Tom   12/15/2005 10:38:53 AM
Another bit in that book which I thought was farcical was where he describes a two seat Harrier being used for Sub Hunting!!!!!!
 
Quote    Reply
1 2 3   NEXT



 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics