Military History
|
How To Make War
|
Wars Around the World
Rules of Use
How to Behave on an Internet Forum
United Kingdom
Discussion Board
Return to Topic Page
Subject:
Operation Sealion would not have succeeded?
JTR~~
9/9/2011 4:18:26 PM
i have here the details/results collected after the Royal Military Academy Sandhurst conducted an extensive experimental war game mimicking the exact plans of Operation Sealion in order to determine a long sought answer to the "what if?" situation. it makes for truly interesting reading and i would be interested to hear your opinions on the matter. Personally when all things are considered it does indeed make a great deal of sense.
http://mr-home.staff.shef.ac.uk/hobbies/seelowe.txt
Regards JTR~~
Quote
Reply
Show Only Poster Name and Title
Newest to Oldest
Factfinder
The Sandhurst Sealion
10/2/2011 12:24:28 PM
One interesting fact about the Sandhurst exercise is that the actual dispositions of the Royal Navy in 1940 were not used in the wargame.
One of the organizers was later one of my university tutors and he would quite happily discuss the exercise at great length. The most interesting point, however, was that in the pre-planning it became obvious that, had the actual RN dispositions been applied to the exercise, then it was unlikely in the extreme that any organized German forces would have reached shore at all.
Consequently, as the whole idea of the game was to bring about a land battle in Southern England (this was at Sandhurst, after all!) the bulk of the RN forces were moved back in order to give the landing forces a window of opportunity to get ashore.
In the 'real' September 1940, there were in the region of seventy RN destroyers and cruisers within 6 hours of the Dover Straits, together with several hundred smaller auxiliaries ranging from sloops & minesweepers to gunboats, armed trawlers, and armed yachts.
Quote
Reply
StobieWan
11/2/2011 8:59:36 AM
Not a chance -the landing preps for the Germans were very amateur hour - they could have put a reasonable force on the beach assuming the RN and RAF took a nap but getting that second wave in would have been almost impossible.
More than likely the RN would have gotten in among the landing zones quite rapidly and the results would have been a massive reversal for the Germans. Even with local air superiority to the Germans, the RN could still have beached some obsolete battleships nearby and pounded the area flat in an all out run.
If you look at the preparations the allies put in to the Normandy invasion vs the amount of shipping the Germans had, you can see the problems - they physically need to put in two or three waves of towed craft to make up a beachhead and if RN MTB's, subs and destroyers start chopping that lot up on either the initial landings or as they head back, that cuts down the reinforcements they can potentially bring. Match prediction, total bloodbath for the Germans...
Quote
Reply
JTR~~
true StobieWan
11/2/2011 10:42:38 AM
the only way i could ever see this working out for the Germans would be highly dependent upon the levels of damage that the Luftwaffe could inflict upon the Royal Navy without their newly lost air superiority with the presumed destrcution of the effective fighting capability of the RAF. to this end one would also have to question as to what losses could the Royal Navy sustain before it too was rendered useless as a fighting entity. worst case scenario, they lose must of their major fleet units, including all of the captial/battleships and the aircraft carriers and most of the cruisers available to them, would the reamaining destroyers MTBs and other small craft be able to mount the same effective repulse of the invading German forces.
in regards to this, my guess would be yes, but it would be a closer run thing, the focus would have to be aimed at the landing vessels and if the Army was maybe able to offer a limited degree of highly mobile inshore counter battery fire with units from the Royal Artillery, the same devestating consequences may have been experienced by the German landing troops as would have been seen should the major fleet assets still been available to the Royal Navy. it would probably place money on saying that the Germans would have stood a better chance and indeed would have landed a larger quantity of troops thus meaning that the land campaign would have been far fiercer, but i still believe the British would have inevitably prevailed, there is always such a bitter outlook in terms of Britain's position in regards to the prospect of the presumed German invasion, just so turns out things were not so clear cut afterall.
the consequences of this operation however could have been disastrous for more than one reason. the Germans would have lost manny of their best troop,s their entire amphibious capability, many resources (which could be replaced but would take vital time), their most experienced initial panzer units and vast swathes of the Kreigsmarine, it would certainly buy Britain vital time, if not putting the question of a renewed invasion effort completely out of the question altogether, further losses would have been seen against the already severely mauled Luftwaffe. this would leave both reeling from the operation. Britain, would have committed all imediate resources available to her, this would most likely result in the destruction of most of the Home Fleet and other vital naval resources and almost the entirity of the RAF rendering the former in a hihgly vulnerable state, the damage done to which may be irreparable and would certainly comprimise Britain's ability to conduct further operations, the latter would have been rendered almost useless as a fighting force altogether however would have been invariably easier to put right once more. The Army would recieve the least scathing and would retain a reasonably effective stance with strenght being increased over the next few months as the re-armament process begins, however initial efforts would in all likeliness be diverted to rebuilding the Navy and Air Force at first one would imagine.
one must question however, that in this perilously weakened state, having given her all to stay in the fight and considerably weaken the German war effort, our attentions must be drawn to the vital Battle in the Atlantic to which the effective and continuous operation of the Royal Navy was vital, i would seem to think that under such circumstances that the U Boat threat would have prevailed and Britain starved into submission at a later point.
anyway that is just my take on things, apologies for any typos etc i was doing this in a rush.
Regards.
Quote
Reply
LB
11/3/2011 3:58:04 AM
Kenneth Macksey in "Invasion" puts forth the notion the Germans real chance was to invade in July 1940 and that by September the window had closed; moreover, instead of the broad front invasion notion he uses a smaller narrow front invasion in July as something that could have worked. It's just his idea as I believe Kesselring supported the notion.
Jodl created a very cogent staff paper regarding prosecuting the war against the UK and in my view Sealion was not required to bring down Churchill's government in favor of one willing to negotiate a settlement.
Quote
Reply
Factfinder
11/3/2011 6:50:14 PM
Unfortunately, when Mackesy wrote his rather silly and implausible book, he seems not to have known that, at a meeting with Hitler, Keitel & Jodl on 20 June 1940, Raeder reported that the German navy had no suitable vessels capable of transporting an invasion force, but that it was hoped that forty five barges could be made available within the next two weeks!
It would have been a very narrow narrow front indeed.
Quote
Reply
Latest
News
Most
Read
Most
Commented
Hot
Topics
SPECIAL OPERATIONS: Ukrainian Improvised Air-Defense Network
AIR DEFENSE: Where the Patriot Missile Batteries Are
AIR DEFENSE: Never Enough Air Defense Missiles
SUBMARINES: US Colombia SSBNs Behind Schedule
PROCUREMENT: Neutral Switzerland Upgrades Its Military
PROCUREMENT: Neutral Switzerland Upgrades Its Military
CHINA: China April 2024 Update
SUBMARINES: New Submarines for Norway
WEAPONS: Russia Running Out of Antique Weapons
SOMALIA: Somalia April 2024
ARTILLERY: New Iranian Weapons
INTELLIGENCE: NATO Suspects a Threat
ATTRITION: Russia fires on Ukrainian Fakes
NAVAL AIR: Tritons Assemble
WEAPONS: South Korean Arms Exports to the Middle East
LIBYA: Libya April Update
ARTILLERY: Russia Bombards Ukraine With North Korean Missiles
WARPLANES: South Korea’s Troubled KF-21 Jet Fighter Project
AIR WEAPONS: Drones Dominate Ukrainian Battlefield
SUBMARINES: Ukraine Obtains Anti-Submarine Weapons
MURPHY'S LAW: Nationwide Impact of Ukraine War in Russia
STRATEGIC WEAPONS: American ARRW Missile Tested
SURFACE FORCES : Vasily Bykov class Corvettes
SPECIAL OPERATIONS: Tatar Rebels in Crimea
PROCUREMENT: China Supercharges Military Spending
ARMOR: M1A2SEP3 Tank Paradox
AIR DEFENSE: Russia Seeks Answers
ARTILLERY: HIMARS Prevails Against Russians
ARTILLERY: Chinese-Truck Mounted Artillery
SURFACE FORCES : Zumwalt Class Destroyers Find a Purpose
Subscribe to Our RSS Feed
Air Defense: Where the Patriot Missile Batteries Are
Special Operations: Ukrainian Improvised Air-Defense Network
Special Operations: Ukrainian Improvised Air-Defense Network
Air Defense: Never Enough Air Defense Missiles
Submarines: US Colombia SSBNs Behind Schedule
WARS China: China April 2024 Update
Weapons: Russia Running Out of Antique Weapons
Procurement: Neutral Switzerland Upgrades Its Military
Procurement: Neutral Switzerland Upgrades Its Military
Submarines: New Submarines for Norway
On PointIsrael's Airspace Defense Victory: Credit Reagan's SDI
Artillery: New Iranian Weapons
Intelligence: NATO Suspects a Threat
WARS Somalia: Somalia April 2024
Naval Air: Tritons Assemble
Attrition: Russia fires on Ukrainian Fakes
WEAPONS: Russia Running Out of Antique Weapons
AIR DEFENSE: Where the Patriot Missile Batteries Are
CHINA: China April 2024 Update
SUBMARINES: New Submarines for Norway
WEAPONS: South Korean Arms Exports to the Middle East
NAVAL AIR: Tritons Assemble
ATTRITION: Russia fires on Ukrainian Fakes
INTELLIGENCE: NATO Suspects a Threat
ARTILLERY: New Iranian Weapons
SOMALIA: Somalia April 2024
PROCUREMENT: Neutral Switzerland Upgrades Its Military
PROCUREMENT: Neutral Switzerland Upgrades Its Military
SUBMARINES: US Colombia SSBNs Behind Schedule
AIR DEFENSE: Never Enough Air Defense Missiles
SPECIAL OPERATIONS: Ukrainian Improvised Air-Defense Network
SPECIAL OPERATIONS: Ukrainian Improvised Air-Defense Network
FORCES: Israeli Haredi Riots
PROCUREMENT: The American Arms Pipeline to Israel
Air Defense: Where the Patriot Missile Batteries Are
News
How To Make War
Wars Around The World
Austin Bay's On Point
StrategyTalk
Dirty Little Secrets
Features
Al Nofi's CIC
Videos
Photos
Jokes
Community
Military Discussion Boards
Military Jokes
Military Photos
Military Book Reviews
StrategyPage
Account Manager
Login
Feedback
About Us
Search
Advertise With Us
Search