Military History | How To Make War | Wars Around the World Rules of Use How to Behave on an Internet Forum
Korea Discussion Board
   Return to Topic Page
Subject: U.N. Adopts Resolution Against N. Korea
EW3    10/14/2006 2:36:58 PM
Looks like John Bolton has done a good job. Time to confirm his appointment. from: http://apnews.myway.com/article/20061014/D8KOI9DO0.html U.N. Adopts Resolution Against N. Korea Email this Story Oct 14, 1:55 PM (ET) UNITED NATIONS (AP) - The U.N. Security Council voted unanimously on Saturday to impose punishing sanctions on North Korea for its claimed nuclear test, declaring that its action posed "a clear threat to international peace and security." The vote came after the United States, Britain and France overcame last-minute differences with Russia and China. The resolution demands North Korea eliminate all its nuclear weapons but expressly rules out military action against the country - a demand by the Russians and Chinese. The Americans also eliminated a complete ban on the sale of conventional weapons; instead, the resolution limits the embargo to major hardware such as tanks, warships, combat aircraft and missiles.
 
Quote    Reply

Show Only Poster Name and Title     Newest to Oldest
EW3    another version of the same story   10/14/2006 2:41:54 PM
a few more details.  Looks like this resolution has teeth.
 

U.N. Council imposes harsh sanctions on North Korea

By Evelyn Leopold

UNITED NATIONS (Reuters) - The U.N. Security Council voted unanimously on Saturday to impose financial and arms sanctions on North Korea to punish the reclusive Communist nation for its nuclear weapon test on Monday. 

The U.S.-drafted resolution allows nations to stop cargo going to and from North Korea to check for weapons of mass destruction or related supplies. 

http://thestar.com.my/archives/2006/10/15/worldupdates/2006-10-14T233919Z_01_NOOTR_RTRJONP_1_India-272271-2-pic0.jpg" border=0>
Russia's Ambassador to the U.N. Vitaly Chirkin (R) and China's Ambassador to the U.N. Wang Guangya (L), along with other diplomats, depart a meeting about a resolution punishing North Korea for testing a nuclear bomb, as they go into further consultations at the U.N. Security Council chambers in New York October 14, 2006. (REUTERS/Chip East)
It requires all countries to prevent the sale or transfer of materials related to Pyongyang's unconventional weapons programs. And the resolution demands nations freeze funds overseas of people or businesses connected with North Korea's nuclear and ballistic missile programs. 

"Today we are sending a strong and clear message to North Korea and other would-be proliferators that there will be serious repercussions in continuing to pursue weapons of mass destruction," U.S. Ambassador John Bolton told the council. 

In a concession to China, the resolution specifically excludes the use of force, but allows economic sanctions and a restriction on naval and air transport. 

But the document still puts an international imprimatur on the U.S.-led Proliferation Security Initiative. This was launched in May 2003 and encourages countries to interdict weapons from North Korea, Iran and other states of concern. 

Wang Guangya, China's U.N. ambassador, told the council Beijing still opposed interdiction and urged nations not to take "provocative steps." 

In 2002, the United States and the Spanish navy had to release a seized vessel that was carrying 15 Scud missiles from North Korea to Yemen, because there was no provision under international law prohibiting it. 

The resolution also drops a ban on all arms going to North Korea, but it puts an embargo on all large-sized conventional arms. 

Russia has changed some of the list of banned items in an annex to the resolution, leaving chemical and biological weapons materials to a council sanctions committee, a procedure that delayed adoption by several hours, diplomats said. 

 
Quote    Reply

EW3       10/15/2006 9:09:47 AM
 
North Korea considering return to six-party talks: Russian envoy

by Nick Coleman1 hour, 19 minutes ago

North Korea still hopes six-party talks on its nuclear programme will continue and will decide on returning to the negotiating table after studying sanctions set out in a UN resolution, a Russian envoy said after visiting Pyongyang.

Speaking in Beijing, Russia's Deputy Foreign Minister Alexander Alexeyev told the RIA-Novosti news agency that the reclusive North Korean leadership was still interested in returning to negotiations.

"They said that only after analysing the UN resolution would they plan the subsequent character of their actions ... including in relation to the resumption of the six-sided process," said Alexeyev Sunday.

He was to fly on to Seoul for further consultations, after the UN Security Council unanimously voted on Saturday to impose punitive sanctions on North Korea for its declared nuclear test while avoiding the threat of military force.

Saturday's resolution called on North Korea to return immediately to the six-party talks on the denuclearisation of the Korean peninsula without precondition.

The talks, which began in 2003, but stalled in November 2005, involve Russia, North Korea, South Korea, China, Japan and the United States.

"The North Korean side several times returned to the point that the six-sided process should continue, that it is not rejecting six-sided negotiations," Alexeyev said, although he did not have high hopes that would happen.

Alexeyev met his North Korean counterpart Kim Ky-kwan and other officials earlier in Pyongyang -- a reflection of the relatively close ties between Russia and North Korea.

The North Koreans insisted on the unthreatening nature of their weapons programme, Alexeyev said.

Pyongyang "is ready to discuss in a constructive manner" steps to create a Korean peninsula free from nuclear weapons, he said.

Officials had promised North Korea would "under no circumstances pass on its nuclear capabilities to another country or use them against anyone," he said.

Communist North Korea -- one of the most impoverished and isolated nations in the world -- has repeatedly insisted that it needs nuclear weapons to deter an attack by the United States, which it says wants to topple its regime.

Russia, along with its neighbour China, had been cautious on US proposals for sanctions on North Korea, insisting that the UN resolution should carry no threat of force and should be time-limited.

Russia has an 18-kilometre (11-mile) border with North Korea in the far eastern coastal province of Primorsky, where a demonstration by students took place in the city of Vladivostok last week against the North Korean test.

On Saturday, Russia's influential Defence Minister Sergei Ivanov called the test a "disgrace" and said that while no ecological damage had been caused to Russia or China, that provided no reassurances about any future tests.

Besides Alexeyev's comments, reaction in Moscow to the sanctions was low key -- in contrast with the praise that came from other countries around the world.

The deputy head of the lower house of parliament's foreign affairs committee, Leonid Slutsky, called the resolution "objective and timely... with the accents in the right places".

"North Korea's activities in the area of nuclear weapons testing are dangerous for the whole region and for global security," he said.

The North's tests "only whip up the self-importance of the United States, which as global gendarme has placed North Korea in an axis of evil," Slutsky was quoted by RIA-Novosti as saying.

Saturday's Security Council meeting saw a resurfacing of US-Russian tensions, as Russian envoy Vitaly Churkin complained about comments by his US counterpart John Bolton.

Bolton had likened a decision by North Korea's envoy to walk out of the session to an incident in 1960 when Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev banged his shoe on a UN desk.

Churkin asked the acting Japanese president of the Security Council to use his influence to ensure that Bolton "even in an emotional state not use inappropriate analogies".

 
Quote    Reply

YelliChink       10/15/2006 4:22:36 PM
From what I've heard from Chinese new sources, "war" is a forbidden word in DPRK now. North Koreans want a war, and want it badly, so that there will be a good chance that their regime won't survive anymore. They'd accept anything, even Chinese commie rule, because anything is better than the thug regime.
 
How bad is the situation is DPRK? It is so bad that meat product in the "market" may consist of human flesh. "A giant prison "is not the precise description to the situation in DPRK today, it is even worse than a pig farm. We humans at least feed pigs and hope they grow meatier before we slaughter them. DPRK regime generates starvation to control people under its rule. Only Russians lived through Stalin and Chinese lived through Mao had experienced the same thing, but they also recognize that the difference between USSR, China and North Korea is that the misery seems never end in North Korea.
 
To allow continual existance of such a regime is nothing but appeasement and also an act of evil. Unfortunately, we sometimes have to tolerate evil and be patient enough to seek better future without too much sacrifice.
 
Quote    Reply

YelliChink       10/15/2006 4:22:39 PM
From what I've heard from Chinese new sources, "war" is a forbidden word in DPRK now. North Koreans want a war, and want it badly, so that there will be a good chance that their regime won't survive anymore. They'd accept anything, even Chinese commie rule, because anything is better than the thug regime.
 
How bad is the situation is DPRK? It is so bad that meat product in the "market" may consist of human flesh. "A giant prison "is not the precise description to the situation in DPRK today, it is even worse than a pig farm. We humans at least feed pigs and hope they grow meatier before we slaughter them. DPRK regime generates starvation to control people under its rule. Only Russians lived through Stalin and Chinese lived through Mao had experienced the same thing, but they also recognize that the difference between USSR, China and North Korea is that the misery seems never end in North Korea.
 
To allow continual existance of such a regime is nothing but appeasement and also an act of evil. Unfortunately, we sometimes have to tolerate evil and be patient enough to seek better future without too much sacrifice.
 
Quote    Reply

Nanheyangrouchuan       10/16/2006 12:45:44 AM
When NK finally does collapse, the discoveries may surpass the Nazi death camps significantly.  NK has been a prison for 40 years.
 
Quote    Reply

reefdiver       10/16/2006 11:47:10 AM

When NK finally does collapse, the discoveries may surpass the Nazi death camps significantly.  NK has been a prison for 40 years.

Problem is - no one really seems to want NK to collapse - they just don't want them to have nukes. I don't believe even the US wants NK to collapse, and South Korea, China, and Russia certainly don't.
 
Quote    Reply



 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics