Military History | How To Make War | Wars Around the World Rules of Use How to Behave on an Internet Forum
United States Discussion Board
   Return to Topic Page
Subject: The President, the Polls & Bradley effect in 2012
PPR    6/18/2012 12:17:18 PM
The Bradley Effect (also called the Wilder Effect) suggests that polls become less accurate when the candidates are of different races. This was first documented when LA Mayor Tom Bradley ran for governor of California is 1982. Exit polls showed him winning by a wide margin, but actual results had him narrowly losing. People were not giving true reports to the pollster (for whatever reason). More recent studies have found this cuts both ways (for and against the candidate) depending on the race break-down of the local population. So a minority candidate running for office in an area with a large minority population can expect to do better than the polls, but in an area with a low minority population will under perform. The 2008 election was the first national election to involve this phenomenon. So what was the impact? Overall, both candidates outperformed the polls (as undecided voters decided), but McCain gained slightly more than Obama (a fraction of 1%). Clearly not enough to impact the election. However if you look at things on a state-by-state level thing become a little more dynamic. Because there are bigger differences in population on a state level there was more movement. There were only two states when the polls got it wrong: --North Carolina (which went for Obama) 15 electoral votes --Indiana which went for McCain) 11 electoral votes A gain of 4 electoral vote for Obama (who appears to have benefited from the Bradley effect on the national level). While the did not impact a lop-sided election like 2008, it might make a difference in a close election. So how will it impact 2012? It appears that some traditionally safe states are now in play. So North Carolina & Virginia (which have typically gone Republican but have large minority populations) are now competitive. For Romney Wisconsin and Oregon (which have typically gone democrat but have low minority populations) are now in play. Safe to say we can expect some surprises on election day. Clearly Romney is running a stronger campaign than McCain did, but there's five months to go. Obama should probably benefit from the Bradley effect because most states are winner-take-all. The states with low minority population tend to be the states with few votes, while the states with large minority populations to to be medium-sized states.
 
Quote    Reply

Show Only Poster Name and Title     Newest to Oldest
CJH       6/18/2012 9:15:25 PM
I have heard of this phenomenon of course and I can understand how this can be. But I have pretty much concluded in past election cycles that there is a pro liberal Democrat bias in polling results.
 
I am not saying this bias still persists but I have, in the past, been used to mentally correcting published results of most polls by shifting 4-10% from the liberal Democrat to the Republican. My guess was that polling organizations skewed their results by polling people who would more likely be open to the Democrat candidate. In addition there was the idea that people might also want to respond in a politically correct way to a pollster where race was not a factor.
 
I noticed that one or two polling organizations tended to give more accurate results than all the rest.
Apparently, it makes a difference whether the polling sample is of people who are likely voters as opposed to people who are merely registered voters.
 
In Obama's case, ideology and race could combine where people believe they are being polled by a liberal.
 
 
Actually, I would like to see someone analyze African American voter motivations with respect to elections where an African American is a liberal Democrat candidate. Was it something like 97% of African Americans who voted for Obama? My impression is that if anything, African Americans are at least slightly more conservative than Whites. All you have to do is note the solid support African Americans give to defense of marriage measures such as NC's Amendment One and that the Obama came out of the closet, so to speak, on gay marriage (surprise surprise!).
 
 
Quote    Reply

PPR    Poll bias   6/20/2012 10:32:16 AM
You are correct that polls tend to over-sample democrats, resulting in a liberal bias.
 
However, the degree of bias is hard to quantify because the only way to measure accuracy is to compare the poll against the actual election results.  If the pollster are wrong, they can simply say that opinion changed as the election got closer.  Also there is a "non-response bias."  Some people just don't want to answer pollsters, which makes them less accurate.
 
Some good rules-of-thumb:
1) Polls of likely voters tend to be more accurate than polls of registered voters or average adults.
2) The larger the sample size the more accurate the result.
3) The closer you get to the election the more accurate the results tend to be (nobody want to be wrong).
4) Polls by media organizations & political parties tend to be less accurate.
 
In the most recent election, Rasmussen & Pew gave the most accurate results.
 
Quote    Reply



 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics