Armor Article Index : Current 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics
Iraq Can't Get Enough M-113s
   Next Article → IRAQ: The Return Of The Leftist Menace
February 26, 2012: Iraq is receiving another 440 refurbished M-113 tracked armored vehicles this year to equip its new mechanized combat force. Iraq already has over 200 M-113s. The U.S. has built over 80,000 of these 12 ton tracked vehicles in over half a century. Carrying a crew of two and eleven passengers armament usually consists of a 12.7mm machine-gun (and often another 7.62mm machine-gun).

Developed in the 1950s, and entering service in 1960, the M-113 saw lots of action in Vietnam. The U.S. began replacing the M-113 as an infantry carrier in the 1980s, but will continue to use it as a support vehicle (weapons carrier, ambulance, command vehicle, and so on) until the end of the decade. Currently, the M-113 is still the most numerous armored vehicle found in American mechanized units.

Over a third of the M-113s produced are still in service in over fifty nations. The U.S. has retired thousands and keeps them for resale (after refurbishment). There are dozens of variants, mainly because of so many upgrades to the engine, mechanical components, and electronics. M-113s are still being built but the refurbished ones Iraq is receiving cost about $300,000 each.

 

Next Article → IRAQ: The Return Of The Leftist Menace
  

Show Only Poster Name and Title     Newest to Oldest
HeavyD    What??? No Sryker-Bashers?   4/5/2012 6:26:09 PM
Golly, I thought some of the "Gavin" homers would be jumping all over this.
 
Especially since a Stryker minus the slat armor costs $3,000,000 each, approximately if not exactly 10x the refurbishment cost of the m113.
 
And speaking of the M113, I find it interesting that the new Israeli APC, the Namer, is armed like a M113 was back in the day:  50 cal and a 7.62mm.  (So please don't call it an IFV...)  Of course it weighs 44 tons and will always have real Merkavas nearby.
 
 
Quote    Reply

LB       4/5/2012 8:01:25 PM
The Namer is 60 tons.  It should really be classed as a heavy infantry carrier.  Israel will probably field different versions with varied weapons on the RWS.  They already sell various RWS around the world including a 30mm with Spike which if mounted on the Namer would make it a superb IFV.
 
That said Israel seems to have quite a different doctrine in regards to infantry carriers and typically load them up with machine guns and even 60mm mortars (the Namer can carry one and the Merkava MBT carries a 60mm mortar internally).  Israel sees the infantry carriers as primarily engaging infantry and not other armored vehicles.
 
This doctrine makes sense on varied levels for Israel including who their potential foes are, the number of tanks deployed, other AT assets including aircraft, etc.  Namer isn't their first heavy infantry carrier as they've been using older tank chassis in this role for to carry both infantry and combat engineers.
 
It's also worth mentioning that Israel is mounting active defense systems on both it's tanks and the Namer and these systems work.
 
Quote    Reply