Strategic Weapons: February 16, 2000

Archives

Senators of both parties have warned Russia, the Pentagon, and the State Department that there will be no START III strategic nuclear weapons treaty unless the Russians follow through on 1991-92 promises by then-President Yeltsin to cut tactical nuclear stockpiles. At the time, the START II treaty was calling for drastic cuts in strategic nuclear warheads (to 3,000 for Russia and to 3,500 for the US) and both sides agreed to corresponding cuts in tactical weapons. The US (seeking to save money) has done so, eliminating entire classes of tactical weapons and reducing the current stockpile of such munitions to only 1,600. The Russians have at least 7,000 and possibly 12,000 tactical nuclear weapons and have done nothing to reduce the stockpile. While the US ratified the START II Treaty in 1996, the Russian Duma has never brought it up for a vote. The Senators have warned that START III (expected to cut strategic stockpiles to 1,500 each) will not pass while the Russians maintain a huge advantage in tactical weapons. --Stephen V Cole

 

X

ad

Help Keep Us From Drying Up

We need your help! Our subscription base has slowly been dwindling.

Each month we count on your contributions. You can support us in the following ways:

  1. Make sure you spread the word about us. Two ways to do that are to like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.
  2. Subscribe to our daily newsletter. We’ll send the news to your email box, and you don’t have to come to the site unless you want to read columns or see photos.
  3. You can contribute to the health of StrategyPage.
Subscribe   Contribute   Close