NEW: Follow the Editorial Staff on
StrategyPage Twitter Link


GROUND COMBAT +

AIR COMBAT +

NAVAL OPERATIONS +

SPECIAL OPERATIONS +

HUMAN FACTORS +

SPECIAL WEAPONS +

WARFARE BY THE NUMBERS +

LOGISTICS +

TOOLS +


Visit StrategyPage's US Cavalry Store



Infantry Article Index : Current 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics

Her Majesties Red Dot Thermals

September 14, 2009: The British Army has ordered 11,000 thermal rifle sights, which include a red dot reflex aiming system. The red dot is similar to the point-and-shoot viewfinder found in cameras for many years. In the 1970s, it first became popular with hunters and paint ball gun users. The red dot sight was more accurate than iron sights, could be used with both eyes open and was generally more effective at typical combat ranges (under a hundred meters). The sight was particularly effective at night, and in the 1970s, that was its big advantage. But now, thermal imaging (seeing differences in heat) also provides the ultimate night sight capability as well.

For over a decade, thermal imaging equipment was large and bulky and only available in vehicles (M-1 tanks and M-2 Bradleys). But in the last few years, smaller and lighter thermal imagers have come on to the market. The portable thermals began reaching troops three years ago, and now every infantryman wants them.

The British thermal sights will cost about $21,000 each, and will include a laser dot system (which projects a red laser dot on nearby targets) to insure that the first shot takes the enemy down. While expensive, the new generation of sights has been found to make well trained troops even more effective. The 95 infantry companies in the British Army that are getting the new sights, are all composed of intensively trained volunteers, which means the sights will be well worth the high price.

submit to reddit
Send Link to a Friend
Next Article IRAQ: Massive And Out-Of-Control


Email Me When A New Comment Is Made
Show Only Poster Name and Title     Sort in Reverse Order Posted

flamingknives       9/14/2009 5:58:54 PM
Item 1.
Red-dot style sights are not inherently more accurate than iron sights. In fact the opposite is probably true. Red dots are, however much easier to use and hence faster to get rounds on targets. 

Item 2.
Unlikely that it will include a visible aiming laser. For one such a laser is largely redundant given a red dot sight, and mainly all British infantry weapons can mount a Rheinmetall Laser Light Module which incorporates visible and near IR lasers and torch (flashlight for those of an American persuasion). The near IR part is not visible to the naked eye but can be seen when using image intensifying.

The thermal sight in question is an uncooled thermal imager called Vipir2+, made by Qioptiq. 
 
Quote    Reply

jwilly48519       9/15/2009 1:01:48 AM
One would think that weapons designers would have some awareness of the physiological statistics of their user community. About 8% of males of primarily Northern European genetic makeup are protoanomalous trichromatic, i.e. "red green colorblind". Among other things, this characteristic typically includes a greatly diminished red sensitivity and a diminished bandwidth at the red end. Monochromatic red sources, such as from single-wavelength lasers, are especially problematic.
 
I don't know of study-based statistics, but it may be that the subgroup of males who are categorizable as high-aggressiveness have this characteristic in an even greater percentage. It *is* known that its frequency is lesser among groups of males that self-select for aesthetically demanding job categories.
 
I'd think that most Western countries wouldn't particularly benefit from addition of a further reason to make ineligible for service a significant percentage of their applicant pool.
 
Quote    Reply

flamingknives       9/15/2009 2:15:51 AM
The thing is that red is an obvious and contrasting colour for those that can see it, plus it does not interfere with low light adjustment or carry very far.

There are logical reasons and advantages for choosing red for the aiming mark. To discard these to perhaps aid 8% of the population (if it is that in the military. There are undoubtedly statistics on the subject somewhere) is not necessarily a good decision.
 
Quote    Reply

RHylton       9/15/2009 4:49:33 AM


It *is* known that its frequency is lesser among groups of males that self-select for aesthetically demanding job categories.

 



That has to be the most PC way I have ever seen to avoid saying Hairdressers and Fashion designers......
 
Quote    Reply

WarNerd       9/15/2009 4:49:48 AM
If they cannot use the sights, then they can either develop a compensating skill or, if unable to perform at an acceptable level, be switch to a specialty that does not require it's use, like logistics or EOD.
 
Quote    Reply





New Strategy - Wargames at Discount Prices
1.Modern Air Power: War Over the Middle East
2.Commander: Napoleon at War
3.Close Combat: Watch am Rhein
4.Gallic Wars
5.Fast Action Battle: The Bulge

100+ Computer and Board games all with free shipping.
 
 
 

StrategyWorld.com© 1998 - 2009StrategyWorld.com. All rights Reserved. StrategyWorld.com, StrategyPage.com, FYEO, For Your Eyes Only and Al Nofi's CIC are all trademarks of StrategyWorld.com Privacy Policy