NEW: Follow the Editorial Staff on
StrategyPage Twitter Link


GROUND COMBAT +

AIR COMBAT +

NAVAL OPERATIONS +

SPECIAL OPERATIONS +

HUMAN FACTORS +

SPECIAL WEAPONS +

WARFARE BY THE NUMBERS +

LOGISTICS +

TOOLS +


Visit StrategyPage's US Cavalry Store



Infantry Article Index : Current 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics

The Future Arrived Early And Unexpectedly

October 2, 2009: The U.S. Army is trying to learn how to adapt to the future (and succeeding), rather than planning for it (and failing). For example, twenty years ago, the army began its "Land Warrior" program to identify, develop and test new technologies for the infantry. The general idea (at least for the press and politicians), was to create a high-tech ensemble of futuristic weapons and equipment for American infantry in the early 21st century (2020 was often mentioned as a target date). Things did not work out as planned, even though there was no detailed "plan." But all was not lost. A few months ago, the army sent an infantry brigade, equipped with Land Warrior gear, to Afghanistan. This, in spite of the fact that, two years ago, after ten years of effort, and about $500 million, the Land Warrior program was cancelled.

Well, sort of cancelled. A lot of this futuristic gear for infantrymen is already out there and in use. However, the Land Warrior program included a lot of technology that still isn't ready for combat. In effect, the Land Warrior program is dead, but the Land Warrior concept lives on with new stuff the combat troops are using. And the effort has been renamed "Ground Soldier Ensemble." The troops will continue to get new tech that works on the battlefield. There is still a plan for a radically new "ensemble." This time the target date is around 2030, and the army is trying to explain to the media (and the politicians who provide the cash) that this effort is mainly an ongoing exploration of new technologies. The Land Warrior experience demonstrated that new tech arrives, usually unexpectedly, too frequently for detailed, long term, plans to work.

For example, when cancelled, the Land Warrior gear included a wearable computer/GPS/radio combination, plus improvements in body armor and uniform design. The original, 1990s, Land Warrior concept was a lot more ambitious. But that version had a science fiction air about it. The brass eventually got more realistic, especially after September 11, 2001. That, plus the unexpectedly rapid appearance of new computer and communications technologies, caused them to reduce the number of items included in the initial Land Warrior release. At the same time, this made it possible for the first version of Land Warrior to undergo field testing over the last two years and, even though that resulted in the cancellation of Land Warrior, many of the individual components will continue to be developed. Eventually all the troops will have wearable computers, and wi-fi capability.

In 2006, a battalion of infantry tested the then current Land Warrior gear in the United States. Many of the troops involved were combat veterans, and their opinions indicated that some of the stuff was worth carrying around the battlefield, and some wasn't. The army has been getting new gear to Iraq and Afghanistan as quickly as it passed muster with the troops, thereby building the Land Warrior ensemble a piece at a time. The 2006 tests discovered some communications problems. This was not unexpected, but the Land Warrior system depends on continuous communications to provide accurate position information for all the networked troops, and their commanders.

What the field tests tried to prove was whether the usual imperfect communications, which have long been common in combat, before and after radio was introduced, render Land Warrior not-worth-the-effort. This is where using combat veterans was so important. Troops who have not been in combat have to guess if certain test conditions would result in a battlefield disaster, or just an annoyance, especially in light of the potential advantages from using Land Warrior.

The army fixed the reliability and GPS update times problems, and in 2008, sent an infantry battalion to Iraq equipped with the "remnants of Land Warrior" gear. The troops found it useful in combat. In particular, they liked how the digital map (they could see in their eyepiece, where it appeared as if they were looking at a laptop display) could be updated by commanders to show new objectives, and how to get there. Since each trooper had GPS and a digital radio, it was easy to send such updates to everyone. This was particularly important because so many operations were at night. Thus the decision to send a brigade (the 5/2nd) equipped with the same gear (eight pounds worth) that the 4/9th battalion found useful.

Over half a century of studies has resulted in knowledge of what an infantryman needs to be more effective. They need to know where they are, quickly. Having a poor idea of where you are proved to be one of the main shortcomings of armored vehicles. Infantrymen can just look around, armored crews tend to be cut off from this while inside their vehicle. The crews are even more easily disoriented. When the shooting starts, even the commander, instead of standing up with his head outside the turret, ducks back inside to stay alive. Infantry aren't much better off. Although they can see their surroundings, they are often crouching behind something. When getting shot at, standing up to look around is not much of an option.

Testing showed that there were several serious problems. The battlefield wi-fi system took about ten seconds to update everyone's position. Manufacturers promised to eventually get down to a third of that, but real-time updates may be a decade away. The troops managed to work around that, up to a point. Between 2006 and 2008, the system was made faster and more reliable.

The troops provided lots of useful feedback For example, the troops want a keypad, at least similar to a cell phone, so they can more easily send text messages (like many of them do now with their cell phones.) The small vidcam mounted on the end of everyone's rifle was dropped, although it may eventually return.

Son of Land Warrior is already changing the way troops fight. Everyone is now able to move around more quickly, confidently and effectively. This model has already been demonstrated with the Stryker units. Captured enemy gunmen often complained of how the Strykers came out of nowhere, and skillfully maneuvered to surround and destroy their targets. This was often done at night, with no lights (using night vision gear.) When you have infantry using Land Warrior gear to do the same thing on foot, you demoralize the enemy. Hostile Iraqis already attribute all manner of science fiction type capabilities to American troops. But with Son of Land Warrior/ Ground Soldier Ensemble, the bar will have to be raised on what's science fiction, and what is just regular issue gear. This is typical of what happens in wartime, where the demand for better weapons and equipment, and a realistic place to test it, greatly accelerates the development and deployment of the new stuff.

The most insurmountable problem was a rather mundane one, battery power. Expected advances in battery technology did not appear, so even if all the technology worked, there was no way to carry sufficient batteries, much less keep Land Warrior users supplied with them. This is proving to be a major problem for one of the more popular new ideas; an exoskeleton, or even an armored suit as in the "Ironman" comics. Stuff like can actually be built, but you can't go very far with it because batteries simply do not exist that can provide the needed power.

The army expects more success with new medicines and medical monitoring devices (which are already showing up in non-military applications). There is a constant flood of new, and often unexpected, consumer electronics. Same way with new gear for civilian hunters and outdoor activities in general. It's a chore just keeping up, but that's what a lot of the army developers spend a lot of their time doing.

But the army has found that the troops are willing to try new stuff in combat. And the infantry often do this without telling the brass, by buying new civilian technology with their own money. Sometimes this even extends to weapons, or weapons accessories. Fortunately, the army provides message boards for the troops to report their experiences, and recommendations. To the army, it's clear that Future Soldier (or whatever the name is changed to) will evolve, more than it will follow a plan.

submit to reddit
Send Link to a Friend
Next Article NAVAL AIR: MiGs Successfully Trapped


Email Me When A New Comment Is Made
Show Only Poster Name and Title     Sort in Reverse Order Posted

Mike From Brielle    It is my   10/2/2009 10:30:20 AM
belief that LW doesn't use wi-fi (IEEE 802.11; The stryker brigades do use something like a robust version of 802.11 but that I believe is not associated with LW directly).  LW uses a modified version of EPLRS which is a far far far more robust waveform.
 
Quote    Reply

gf0012-aust       10/2/2009 11:29:37 AM

belief that LW doesn't use wi-fi (IEEE 802.11; 
I think you'll find that they're looking at it though  - including 3G solutions.  A number of US allies are on similar development paths, so there is some considerable "chat" between the future development teams.
 
Quote    Reply

esmoore5       10/2/2009 12:07:02 PM
New, lighter ammo is also in the works. See: link
 
Quote    Reply

trenchsol       10/2/2009 12:42:07 PM
New generation of devices that combine cell phone and PDA is out. In couple of years everyone will be using them. Forcing troops to adapt to something very different would be a waste of time.
 
DG

 
Quote    Reply

Mike From Brielle    trenchsol and gf0012-aust    10/2/2009 1:17:05 PM
gf0012-aust:   3G and Wi-Fi work on very different principles and yes you can stuff the two of them in the same box but if neither signal is capable of communicating in the environment in which the warfighter finds himself then they are useless.
  trenchsol:  The Man Machine interface is superfluous to the link type.  If the link type is incapable of doing the job than the warfighter is out of luck unless their fighting in the middle of a StarBucks:).  If its that important then you can just create a Man Machine Interface that mimics the popular one however once your done with adding all the military requirements its open to interpretation how much it will still look like the commercial product.
 
 
In truth I'm a little prejudiced in favor of the EPLRS waveform for this purpose.  A long time ago I was a Project Leader on a somewhat related program and I believe I was the first one to suggest to the person who was at the time the Project Leader for Land Warrior (or very close to that position), who didn't know squat about comms, that they should consider the EPLRS waveform.  That was a good one:)!
 
Quote    Reply

smitty237    Just a thought   10/2/2009 9:46:44 PM
What if the entire exoskeleton was itself a battery?  Or at the very least a battery was part of the integral design of the exoskeleton rather than a separate unit?  Lithium batteries are rolled up stips of strips of Lithium.  What if you kept the stips flat and made it a part of the armor plates and somehow found a way for the plates to not only store energy for the power unit, but also be capable of being easily recharged by plugging it in to a power source at base camps?  I guess the real challenge would be creating the technology to store power in the strips for any period of time. 
 
Like I said, just a thought. 
 
Quote    Reply

gf0012-aust       10/2/2009 10:16:21 PM
gf0012-aust:   3G and Wi-Fi work on very different principles and yes you can stuff the two of them in the same box but if neither signal is capable of communicating in the environment in which the warfighter finds himself then they are useless.

that issue not only effects 3g and wi-fi.  the reality is that these systems are already in test and in hot environments being battle tested.

warfighters won't always deploy with a full suite, and depending on the env will go in with a subset suite.

these are complimentary techs, not replacement techs.
 
Quote    Reply

gf0012-aust       10/2/2009 10:22:06 PM

What if the entire exoskeleton was itself a battery?  Or at the very least a battery was part of the integral design of the exoskeleton rather than a separate unit?
already happening.  DARPA gave an annual presentation to us Oct last year and it included those concepts.  Think of an accelerometer as a form of motion generator and energy converter.

there is some tricky stuff coming out of a number of international military geek shops.  esp US and France
 
Quote    Reply

gf0012-aust       10/2/2009 10:52:46 PM

What if the entire exoskeleton was itself a battery?  Or at the very least a battery was part of the integral design of the exoskeleton rather than a separate unit?
already happening.  DARPA gave an annual presentation to us Oct last year and it included those concepts.  Think of an accelerometer as a form of motion generator and energy converter.

there is some tricky stuff coming out of a number of international military geek shops.  esp US and France
 
Quote    Reply

Thomas       10/3/2009 5:23:27 PM
I would consider the programme a success - never mind if the majority of the money is wasted.
We are talking light infantry - which from definition is NOT heavily armoured. If you at all times can tell them, Where they are, where their mates are, where the enemy is and keep in contact with the commander/officer: That would be a technical revolution.
I'm thoroughly against suting them up like science fiction clones. The protection light infantry uses does deprive them of information - which is the severest drawback of light infantry fighting. Why use a tank, when you can use a "grassy knoll".
 
What we get back to: Battery weight. When I was in the Observer Corps the most critical supply item was batteries.
Reliable equipment which use less juice and better sources of stored power - that would revolutionise light forces.
Networking is probably most usefull to point out targets for the sniper - the new heavy weapon for light forces.
 
Quote    Reply

jak267       10/5/2009 1:02:21 AM
New battery technology is coming - and is going to make a huge difference in portable electronics.
 
But it's ridiculous to cancel a program like Land Warrior - if you are using it correctly. You have to have a vision for an integrated future - but you obviously have to realize that anything you are working on in the lab is a "concept" and not a development program. So you expect some aspects to prove unworkable (at least until the technology catches up) and other aspects to be adopted singly.
 
But you can't lose sight of the fact, that the ongoing goal is integration of all the parts.

 
 
 
Quote    Reply

Mike From Brielle    jak267   10/5/2009 10:31:30 AM
I think the ultimate goal is to develope an effective weapon but most times, fortunetly or unfortunetly, the reality is to conform to the letter of the contract.  At the level when your trying to deliver working equipmernt to our forces who are engaged with the enemy  it can be very dangerous to experiment.  When we do insert equipment into the basic load it should be made with very clear expectations as to what specifically its expected to do and under what conditions to fullfill a specific need.  In the case of something like Blue Force Tracking (BFT) there was an adaptation of a system called omnitracs used for truckers that was intertgrated with FBCB2 originally in the Balkans to keep track of our troops but later extended to Afghanistan and Iraq.  However BFT has a very limited performance envelope compared to straight FBCB2.
 
Quote    Reply

Mike From Brielle    gf0012-aust   10/5/2009 1:13:27 PM
Wi-Fi (IEEE 802.11) is working in a limited capacity that has nothing to do with LW but with Stryker and in that capacity it has nothing to do with what might be called the edge of the battlefield.
 
 
Unless there is a already in place a cellular system with the base stations and all the other overhead that you are compatible with or you can bring those items with you there is no ability to use 3G.  I believe we are encouraging the placement of non 3G Cell systems in Iraq and Afghanistan but that has very little to do the use as tactical systems but it is my understanding that occasionally they are used as an convenient augmentation.
 
Quote    Reply





New Strategy - Wargames at Discount Prices
1.Modern Air Power: War Over the Middle East
2.Commander: Napoleon at War
3.Close Combat: Watch am Rhein
4.Gallic Wars
5.Fast Action Battle: The Bulge

100+ Computer and Board games all with free shipping.
 
 
 

StrategyWorld.com© 1998 - 2009StrategyWorld.com. All rights Reserved. StrategyWorld.com, StrategyPage.com, FYEO, For Your Eyes Only and Al Nofi's CIC are all trademarks of StrategyWorld.com Privacy Policy