Infantry Article Index : Current 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics
Learning To Make The Most Of Portable Artillery
   Next Article → NAVAL AIR: BAMS In Action
January 8, 2012: Now that the U.S. Army had adopted the 84mm Carl Gustav portable recoilless rifle, the U.S. Army 75th Ranger Regiment, which has been using the Carl Gustav for over two decades, is providing some valuable user experience. The Carl Gustav was adopted by SOCOM (Special Operations Command) for the Ranger Regiment in 1990. While part of the army, the Ranger Regiment is controlled by SOCOM. Regular army troops have been demanding the Carl Gustav ever since, mainly because it is a more accurate rocket launcher with a longer range than competing weapons (like the Russian RPG).

The Carl Gustav is the first multiple-shot rocket launcher army infantry have used since the smooth bore 3.5 inch (88mm) bazooka was phased out in the 1960s. The Carl Gustav is basically a lightweight 8.5 kg (19 pound) recoilless rifle. It is 1.1 meters (3.6 feet) long. The barrel is rifled and good for about a hundred rounds.

The army also got rid of its recoilless rifles in the 1970s, replacing them with anti-tank guided missiles. What made the Carl Gustav unique was that it had the long range of a recoilless rifle (which used rifled barrels) but had a short barrel and was much more portable. The most popular American recoilless rifle was the 52 kg (114.5 pound), 75mm, M20. With its long barrel (2.1 meters/6.9 feet) the M20 had a range of 6,400 meters. That was fine for use against tanks, but the army brass never appreciated the fact that the recoilless rifle was most frequently used against infantry in bunkers or buildings. The Carl Gustav took all this into account and has been very popular with the infantry because of its portability and long range.

The 84mm projectiles weigh about 2 kg (4.4 pounds) each and come in several different types (anti-armor, combined anti-armor/high explosive, illumination, and smoke). The anti-armor round is very useful in urban areas and against bunkers. Range is 500-700 meters (depending on type of round fired), but an experienced gunner can hit a large target at up to 1,000 meters.

The army had earlier adopted the single shot version of the Carl Gustav (as the AT4), but the Special Forces showed that the Carl Gustav is better because you get more shots for less weight (the AT4 weighs about 6.8 kg each). It's easier to carry one Carl Gustav, at 8.5 kg, and a bunch of rocket propelled shells at about 2.2 kg (5 pounds, with packaging) each.

What new users of the Carl Gustav have to be most careful with is the back blast, which is more intense than that of the AT4. Army rangers also found that the best way to use the Carl Gustav is with a two man team. One carries and operates the Carl Gustav (and is best armed only with a 9mm pistol as a personal weapon). The other man carried 5-6 rounds of 84mm ammo and operates as a spotter for the Carl Gustav gunner. Depending on the situation, a squad might carry a Carl Gustav instead of a M240 light machine-gun. If you expect to encounter enemy troops some distance away, like over 500 meters, the Carl Gustav is the way to go. The Carl Gustav has been very useful in Afghanistan. One thing users had to constantly keep in mind was that the 84mm shell did not arm until it was at least 100 meters out.

 

Next Article → NAVAL AIR: BAMS In Action
  

Show Only Poster Name and Title     Newest to Oldest
heraldabc    And we come full circle jerk.   1/8/2012 9:35:19 AM
The more things change; the more they stay the same. A bazooka is still a bazooka.
 
H.
 
Quote    Reply

Bill Befort       1/8/2012 2:04:49 PM
Hey, you don't mean "multiple-shot," you mean "reloadable."  And if the Carl G. is the first reloadable AT launcher we've had since the 3.5 bazooka, what was that 90mm M67 device the Army had me carrying up and down (mostly up) the hills of Korea in 1965? 
 
Back in the 66mm LAW days we could have had a genuine "multiple-shot" shoulder-fired AT weapon if we'd figured out how to shoot HEAT rounds from the M202 4-barrel incendiary launcher.  I've never understood why we didn't take that step.  If you can engineer it, a repeater always beats a single-shot weapon, as you can adjust your aim after your first round misses -- the usual result with the LAW.
 
Isn't the RPG far cheaper than the Carl G?   Like, hundreds vs. thousands?
 
Quote    Reply

Ispose    M-67's   1/8/2012 4:11:50 PM
We had the 90mm M-67 recoiless rifles in my combat engineer unit in the 80's. Was a decent weapon...good reloadable firepower and would be fine on bunkers, trucks, and APC's.
 
 
Quote    Reply

heraldabc       1/8/2012 4:22:23 PM
Heavy at 17 kilograms and with a danger zone that was huge even by bazooka standards, I can see why LAW replaced it. 
 
As for the M-202..., the rockets tended to explode INSIDE the launcher. Not a good thing.
 
Yes.
 
H.


Isn't the RPG far cheaper than the Carl G?   Like, hundreds vs. thousands?

 
Quote    Reply

WarNerd       1/9/2012 2:46:50 AM
Isn't the RPG far cheaper than the Carl G?   Like, hundreds vs. thousands?
The RPG is cheaper than the Carl Gustav, but then a Colt .45 is cheaper than a M-41 sniper rifle. The question is which would of each pair you rather have in a fight at 500m? All 4 weapons have lob a round that far, but only the Carl Gustav and the M-41 likely to hit what they are aiming at, or anywhere near it.
 
Quote    Reply

Ispose       1/12/2012 10:48:10 PM
Heavy at 17 kilograms and with a danger zone that was huge even by bazooka standards, I can see why LAW replaced it.
Stick to avionics Herald...the LAW did not replace it...the LAW was issued along with it...the LAW was considered ammunition...just like 5.556 / 7.62 rounds, grenades, etc. They were issued out as needed to everyone in the squad. The M-67's were 2 man crew served...like a M-2 .50 HMG.
I lugged the bastards around and fired a couple dozen rounds thru them...the were fine for what we needed them for...anti bunker, trucks, light armor, etc. The had far more ACCURATE range than a LAW. The Carl Gustav is a better recoiless rifle...lighter, same punch, better sights but the M-67's served their purpose.
They provided us with fairly effective immediate use heavy firepower...but they were old and eventually had to be replaced.
They still serve a purpose just like .50 HMG's and 60mm mortars...portable heavy firepower.
 
 
 
 
Quote    Reply