November17, 2006:
Lawfare has now gone international, with a lawsuit against American
officials, filed in Germany, by the Center for Constitutional Rights. The suit,
targeting Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, Attorney General Alberto Gonzales,
and former CIA Director George Tenet, is aimed at getting the German government
to investigate alleged war crimes that have, to date, been shown to have little
basis in reality. Germany was selected as a venue for this lawsuit due to the
fact that it claims universal jurisdiction over war crimes. This means that any
war crime committed by anyone anywhere on the globe can be tried in a German
court. And anyone can bring a suit in a court in the Western world.
Torture
claims have been ongoing. In 2005, there were questions raised about the
treatment of the detainees. In July of that year, Senator Richard Durbin
compared the treatment of the detainees to Nazi concentration camps. This was
despite the fact that out of over 24,000 interrogations, incidents of abuse
were rare (32 involving interrogations - 6 of which were corrected on the spot,
with the rest dealt with through normal channels). Of the 10,000 troops at
Guantanamo Bay, only ten were disciplined for not meeting standards - and in
many of those cases, the disciplined soldiers had been provoked by the
detainees (one case of alleged abuse came after a detainee had spat in the face
of an interrogator).
One
of the other bones of contention was the release of an interrogation diary
involving a high-value detainee. The methods used during the detainee's
interrogations were portrayed as routine. They were not - the techniques had
been authorized as part of a special protocol. Naturally, human rights groups
have been complaining about this, and their concerns are amplified by
sympathetic news reports. Having lost in the legislative arena, they now have
turned to foreign courts.
The
lawsuit not only cites Guantanamo Bay, but it also cites Abu Ghraib. This
"apples and oranges" approach shows how thin the case really is. Abu
Ghraib was the actions of some rogue military policemen. At Guantanamo Bay, the
special techniques were authorized and the proper authorities were informed. In
the investigations of these matters, the results were clear: No torture
occurred.
The
other thing the German court was probably not told was just exactly what some
of these detainees did. For instance, Mohamed Qahtami is a senior al-Qaeda
operative who was slated to be the fifth hijacker on Flight 93 (this is the
flight that crashed in Pennsylvania after a revolt by the passengers), but was
denied entry in August, 2001. He was a trained terrorist sent to murder Americans
(and others). Another detainee was believed to have gone to Pakistan with an
Iraqi intelligence officer to launch a mortar attack on the American and
British embassies in that country.
In
essence, the lawfare attack in Germany really is little more than an effort to
rehash old (and unfounded) allegations in a new forum. This time, the lawfare
has gone international, and it has the potential to not only make life
miserable for American officials who go abroad, but it will also complicate
relations between the United States and Germany. - Harold C. Hutchison ([email protected])