July 2, 2007:
The battle,
between the U.S. Army and Air Force, over who controls the air space over the
battlefield, continues to heat up. What's happened, in effect, is that that,
because of UAVs and smart bombs, most of the aircraft over the battlefield
belong to the army. As a result, the army wants to have control over that air
space, even though, traditionally, the air force has been in charge. The army
is pushing the fact that most of the aerial vehicles (UAVs, helicopters,
artillery shells, rockets) at low altitudes (under 20,000 feet) are army. For
example, the army currently has over 1,300 UAVs in Iraq, over 200 helicopters,
and dozens of rocket launchers and 155mm guns. In effect, over 95 percent of
the aircraft at low altitudes belong to the army. It makes no sense to have the
air force calling the shots. To handle all this traffic, the army has developed
an air traffic control system (TAIS, or Tactical Airspace Integration System)
which uses a laptop screen to show all air traffic in a several hundred square
kilometer area. TAIS systems cost about $3 million each, and draws data from
many sources, to allow army commanders to have a 3-D view of
what's up there. The army has TAIS link to air force ATC (air traffic
control), but the air force attitude is that they have always called the shots
over who does what up there, and that's the way it should stay.
To further inflame relations,
the air force keeps pushing to take control of developing all larger UAVs (that
operate at above 10,000 feet). This would include the army's new Warrior
(literally, Predator Lite) UAV. The army has dug in its heels on this one, and
has shipped over 30 TAIS systems to Iraq and Afghanistan, to stake its claim on
air space control.
The air force has never
considered itself just a "support service" for the army (although that has
always been the army attitude). However,
smart bombs have made it appear that most of what the air force does is
just fly in circles, dropping smart bombs where and when the army guys down
below call for them. The air force pilots are eager and willing to come down
low to use their cannon, or fly around for hours using their targeting pods to
look for the enemy on the ground. But the air force brass are not too keen on
risking their expensive fighters that close to hostile heavy machine-guns. Nor
are the air force generals satisfied that all that targeting pod use is worth
the effort.
So despite the fact that the
air force and the army are working together more effectively than they have in
decades, the disputes are also more heated than they have been for a long time.