February15, 2007:
Much is made of Chinese weapons that have been either purchased or
developed in recent years. But do these things really push China to a point
where they can serious contest control of the sea with the United States Navy?
The answer is going to make a lot of those hyping China's new systems feel
embarrassed.
China's
been making huge investments in aircraft, with the J-10, the Su-30MKK, and the
JH-7A. These are aircraft on par with Western designs like the F-15E, F-16, and
F-18. These aircraft are now beginning to enter service in large numbers.
However, the United States not only has large numbers of F-18s, F-16s, and
F-15Es, they are deploying the F-22, and within the next five years, will also
be introducing the F-35. While the F-22 is expensive, it is a quantum leap over
other fighters in terms of its performance. The F-35 offers performance
comparable to the F-18, but uses stealth technology to become harder to see. In
order to reliably hit (and kill) an aircraft, one must be able to see it
somehow.
Some
of the other systems that have been mentioned in the Chinese build-up are new
Sovremenny-class destroyers. These new ships are much more powerful than the
Sovremenny-class vessels in service with Russia and China. One of the new
features is a longer-range version of the Sunburn anti-ship missile (with 200
kilometers of range as opposed to 120 kilometers). Another change is the
addition of the CADS-N-1 system, which combined two 30mm Gatling guns with the
SA-N-11/SA-19 Grisom missile. The longer-ranged missiles are intended to give
China a better chance at hitting an American carrier.
That
said, China's modern destroyer force will be small, consisting of twelve modern
vessels by 2010. The American Pacific Fleet has nearly twice as many comparable
destroyers at present, and additional ships will be joining the fleet. The
Pacific Fleet also has eleven Ticonderoga-class cruisers, compared to no
comparable vessels for China.
Perhaps
the biggest gap is in terms of China's performance is in the ability to project
air power. The only carriers China really has have been used as floating theme
parks. The Minsk, a Kiev-class carrier, has folded as an amusement park. The
former Russian carrier Varyag, a Kuznetov-class carrier acquired in 1999, could
theoretically be made ready, but that would require significant effort, not to
mention engines, electronics, and weapons. The Varyag (now named Shilang), is
perhaps best suited as a testbed, since China has never really built a warship
that big before, never mind the fact they have never operated an aircraft
carrier.
Sounds
like a first step, but one must keep in mind that the United States has
operated carriers for roughly eight decades, and has fought several wars using
them. This is a huge experience advantage that will not be easily overcome by
China. That's before one actually bothers counting carriers. The Pacific Fleet
has six very modern carriers, each carrying four squadrons of multi-role
fighters.
China's
buildup is impressive, but it is also too little, too late. They have made
advances and have bought new vessels, but the United States has not been
sitting still. Even after a decade of relatively low defense spending (1992-2001),
and the decommissioning of ships like the Spruance-class destroyers that could
still have been valuable, the United States instead has made advances that make
it the predominant power in the world. – Harold C. Hutchison
([email protected])