December 10,2008:
The capture of one of the ten Mumbai terrorists has been a disaster for
Pakistan. The captured terrorist talked, and his information checked out, and
made it clear that Pakistan was tolerating Islamic terrorist groups operating
openly inside Pakistan. This is nothing new, but such dramatic proof is. The
U.S., the UN and most other major countries put the pressure on Pakistan to do
something about this, or risk being officially branded a pro-terrorist state.
Pakistan responded to that pressure in the last week by arresting several
senior terrorist leaders known to be operating in Pakistan. But Pakistan
refused to allow India to take these terrorists. That's because if these guys
began talking, they would confirm Pakistan's long term support of Islamic
terrorist activities. These are admissions that Pakistan does not want to deal
with. Nevertheless, Pakistan has long been known as a supporter of Islamic
terrorists, even though some of these terrorist organizations are trying to
kill Pakistani leaders. That is a rather recent development, which came about
after September 11, 2001, when the Pakistani leadership were forced to decide
between backing the war on terror, or siding with the terrorists. At that
point, some Islamic terrorists began attacking Pakistani leaders. But others,
like those responsible for the Mumbai attacks (Lashkar e Toiba) did not support
the overthrow of the Pakistani government (at least not right away), and
continued to be protected by the government.
But Lashkar
e Toiba continued to plan attacks inside India, which India has warned could
lead to nuclear war. But Pakistan did not want to enrage another bunch of
Islamic terrorists. Now they have no choice, or do they? India and the United
States are watching closely exactly what Pakistan does to the "Kashmir
(dedicated to taking Kashmir from Indian control) terrorists" like Lashkar
e Toiba. Pakistan has made a few arrests, and everyone is waiting to see if, or
when, Pakistan will do some real damage to these groups. So far, Pakistan has
not. Groups like Lashkar e Toiba are very popular in Pakistan, because getting
control of Kashmir is very popular. The government fears that going after the
Kashmir terrorists would cause a civil war inside Pakistan. That has always
been a risk, which even India acknowledged. But now the Indian government has a
population enraged about the activities (like Mumbai, and similar attacks
earlier) of the Pakistani Kashmir terror groups, and wants something done. Pakistan is being forced into a corner, where
the choices come down to civil war with their Islamic conservatives and
radicals (about a third of the population), or war with India, which could
escalate into a nuclear conflict that Pakistan would lose. The civil war would be messy, but the
government would almost certainly win it. Pakistani politicians, being risk
averse, are looking for some way out of this mess. There doesn't seem to be
one.
Meanwhile,
the battle against the Taliban continues on the Afghan border. The Taliban are
now trying to threaten truck traffic into Afghanistan. As a landlocked country
with no railroads, most imports travel into Afghanistan via truck, along only a
few roads that cross the border. This trucking business is very lucrative for
Pakistani transportation companies, and vital for the economy of Afghanistan. These
attacks will force the Pakistanis to assign more troops and police to
protecting the trucking operations. Not so much to protect U.S. and NATO supply
lines, but to protect a major economic asset for political and economic big
shots on both sides of the border. You do not want to be messing with the money
in this part of the world.
December 5,
2008: Two large bombs went off in Peshawar (the largest city in the Pakistani
tribal territories along the Afghan border) killing 27 people.
December 2,
2008: Ethnic clashes in Karachi,
Pakistan continue, leaving four more dead. Pakistan is a patchwork of religious
and ethnic groups, which tend to form militias for self-defense, or for going
after real or imagined rivals. Bloodshed between these groups has been a
constant in Pakistani life for over half a century, and for centuries before
that.